StockComparison Logo
vs

GRMN vs CCJ

Comparison between Garmin Ltd (GRMN, Company) and Cameco Corp (CCJ, Company).

GRMN is from the Technology sector, while CCJ is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceCCJ has outperformed GRMN, delivering a return of +40.3% compared to +13.9%

GRMN vs CCJ - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
GRMN
$46B
CCJ
$45B
Max Drawdown
Winner
GRMN
87.75%
CCJ
90.11%
Sharpe Ratio
GRMN
0.69
Winner
CCJ
1.47
5Y Beta
Winner
GRMN
1.10
CCJ
1.44
Industry
GRMN
Scientific & Technical Instruments
CCJ
Uranium
P/E Ratio
Winner
GRMN
26.35
CCJ
95.38
Forward P/E
Winner
GRMN
25.00
CCJ
90.91
PEG Ratio
GRMN
1.45
Winner
CCJ
0.55
Dividend Yield
Winner
GRMN
1.77%
CCJ
0.23%
5Y Dividends CAGR
GRMN
7.64%
Winner
CCJ
23.04%
5Y EPS CAGR
GRMN
11.05%
CCJ
N/A
Debt to Equity
Winner
GRMN
0.00%
CCJ
14.11%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
GRMN
3.17%
CCJ
1.45%
P/S Ratio
Winner
GRMN
6.14
CCJ
12.97
P/B Ratio
Winner
GRMN
4.76
CCJ
8.81

GRMN vs CCJ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
GRMN
-9.71%
CCJ
-17.17%
3M
Winner
GRMN
-2.21%
CCJ
-11.79%
6M
GRMN
+26.25%
Winner
CCJ
+32.12%
1Y
GRMN
+21.38%
Winner
CCJ
+98.74%
5Y(CAGR)
GRMN
+13.89%
Winner
CCJ
+40.33%
10Y(CAGR)
GRMN
+22.77%
Winner
CCJ
+25.83%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
GRMN
+16.59%
CCJ
+16.24%

GRMN vs CCJ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearGRMNCCJ
2026+19.36%+6.28%
2025+0.77%+75.75%
2024+65.84%+22.48%
2023+41.13%+88.26%
2022-28.81%+0.21%
2021+16.75%+63.29%
2020+24.79%+50.79%
2019+60.15%-21.36%
2018+9.89%+17.72%
2017+25.77%-7.65%
2016+37.97%-9.70%
2015-25.72%-22.35%
2014+21.67%-17.55%
2013+16.24%+4.77%
2012+9.09%+7.12%
2011+39.94%-54.76%
2010+0.27%+22.69%
2009+44.43%+67.88%
2008-78.27%-57.86%
2007+75.54%+1.71%
2006+66.91%+19.51%
2005+13.62%+91.08%
2004+14.29%+79.66%
2003+83.34%+139.47%
2002+37.88%-0.58%
2001+10.75%+46.91%
2000-1.25%+19.86%
1999N/A-9.23%

GRMN vs CCJ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GRMN was -87.71%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2846 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CCJ was -87.53%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 4132 trading sessions.

The current GRMN drawdown is -10.02%. The current CCJ drawdown is -21.88%.

RankGRMNCCJ
#1-87.71%
Oct 29, 2007 - Feb 20, 2019
-87.53%
Jun 15, 2007 - Nov 13, 2023
#2-54.62%
Aug 30, 2021 - May 6, 2024
-47.40%
Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 2, 2003
#3-51.02%
Jan 8, 2004 - Nov 26, 2004
-40.14%
Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 8, 2000
#4-42.70%
Feb 8, 2001 - Dec 2, 2002
-40.01%
Dec 5, 2024 - Jun 9, 2025
#5-38.17%
Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020
-33.53%
May 31, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024
#6-36.29%
Dec 28, 2004 - Sep 9, 2005
-30.79%
May 21, 2001 - Feb 8, 2002
#7-27.98%
Feb 19, 2025 - Aug 28, 2025
-28.35%
May 10, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007
#8-27.97%
Oct 8, 2025 - Apr 13, 2026
-27.84%
Jan 5, 2004 - Jul 14, 2004
#9-27.88%
Jun 6, 2003 - Oct 29, 2003
-25.69%
Oct 28, 2025 - Jan 9, 2026
#10-22.40%
Oct 3, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006
-24.56%
Mar 18, 2005 - Jul 19, 2005
#11-21.56%
Jun 29, 2006 - Oct 26, 2006
-24.27%
Jan 28, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026
#12-20.32%
Sep 27, 2007 - Oct 24, 2007
-21.74%
Feb 1, 2024 - May 6, 2024
#13-19.77%
Dec 11, 2000 - Feb 2, 2001
-15.25%
Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006
#14-18.02%
Oct 26, 2006 - Dec 15, 2006
-14.91%
Dec 12, 2000 - Jan 9, 2001
#15-15.61%
Apr 20, 2026 - May 15, 2026
-14.21%
Oct 4, 2005 - Nov 21, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between GRMN and CCJ is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.75
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

GRMN vs CCJ dividend yield comparison.

YearGRMNCCJ
20260.37%0.00%
20251.70%0.19%
20241.44%0.22%
20232.27%0.20%
20223.10%0.39%
20211.92%0.29%
20202.01%0.46%
20192.30%0.67%
20183.32%0.53%
20173.42%4.33%
20164.21%3.82%
20155.41%3.24%
20143.58%2.44%
20134.87%1.93%
20126.26%2.03%
20118.04%2.22%
20104.84%0.69%
20092.44%0.75%
20083.91%1.39%
20070.77%0.50%
20060.90%0.38%
20050.75%0.36%
20040.82%0.57%
20030.92%1.04%
20020.00%2.08%
20010.00%2.02%
20000.00%2.60%
19990.00%0.82%

Select Stocks to Compare