GRFS vs BMA
Comparison between Grifols SA (GRFS, Company) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA, Company).
GRFS is from the Healthcare sector, while BMA is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceBMA has outperformed GRFS, delivering a return of +46.9% compared to -14.4%
GRFS vs BMA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GRFS vs BMA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GRFS vs BMA - Annual Returns (2006 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GRFS | BMA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -17.32% | -1.34% |
| 2025 | +26.06% | -14.47% |
| 2024 | -32.67% | +286.66% |
| 2023 | +32.27% | +98.94% |
| 2022 | -26.98% | +24.78% |
| 2021 | -39.47% | -4.10% |
| 2020 | -21.16% | -57.18% |
| 2019 | +31.32% | -13.37% |
| 2018 | -19.94% | -61.04% |
| 2017 | +44.23% | +66.78% |
| 2016 | +2.30% | +12.32% |
| 2015 | -3.95% | +39.04% |
| 2014 | -1.76% | +104.57% |
| 2013 | +42.07% | +27.40% |
| 2012 | +158.95% | -11.21% |
| 2011 | -12.53% | -59.83% |
| 2010 | N/A | +73.15% |
| 2009 | N/A | +151.68% |
| 2008 | N/A | -52.98% |
| 2007 | N/A | -21.87% |
| 2006 | N/A | +39.32% |
GRFS vs BMA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GRFS was -78.00%, occurring on Mar 6, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for BMA was -91.65%, occurring on Jul 21, 2022. Recovery took 1798 trading sessions.
The current GRFS drawdown is -68.77%. The current BMA drawdown is -21.71%.
| Rank | GRFS | BMA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.00% Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 6, 2024 | -91.65% Oct 23, 2017 - Dec 16, 2024 |
| #2 | -38.75% Jul 21, 2011 - Feb 2, 2012 | -81.41% Feb 13, 2007 - Jul 20, 2010 |
| #3 | -37.14% Jun 9, 2014 - Jun 21, 2017 | -77.47% Dec 10, 2010 - Feb 12, 2015 |
| #4 | -28.71% Jun 12, 2018 - Jan 7, 2020 | -65.39% Jan 7, 2025 - Sep 19, 2025 |
| #5 | -19.20% Jan 16, 2018 - Jun 12, 2018 | -43.92% Mar 17, 2015 - Nov 20, 2015 |
| #6 | -16.59% Apr 30, 2013 - Jul 25, 2013 | -23.18% Nov 20, 2015 - Feb 18, 2016 |
| #7 | -16.32% May 3, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012 | -22.89% Oct 19, 2016 - Feb 9, 2017 |
| #8 | -14.48% Mar 12, 2014 - Jun 5, 2014 | -21.80% May 10, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #9 | -12.71% Aug 2, 2013 - Nov 21, 2013 | -19.36% Feb 25, 2016 - Apr 19, 2016 |
| #10 | -11.16% Jun 22, 2017 - Oct 31, 2017 | -18.55% Apr 19, 2016 - Jun 17, 2016 |
| #11 | -9.82% Nov 2, 2012 - Dec 21, 2012 | -12.09% Jun 5, 2017 - Aug 14, 2017 |
| #12 | -9.72% Jul 31, 2012 - Sep 21, 2012 | -10.90% Aug 25, 2016 - Oct 19, 2016 |
| #13 | -9.54% Jun 2, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 | -10.85% Dec 16, 2024 - Jan 2, 2025 |
| #14 | -9.35% Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 | -10.66% Jun 20, 2016 - Jul 13, 2016 |
| #15 | -8.56% Jan 10, 2020 - Feb 18, 2020 | -10.56% Aug 10, 2010 - Sep 14, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between GRFS and BMA is 0.02 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2006 - 2026)
GRFS vs BMA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GRFS | BMA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 3.11% |
| 2025 | 1.88% | 2.38% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 6.10% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 7.75% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 7.28% |
| 2021 | 3.20% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 0.83% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 1.55% | 6.20% |
| 2018 | 2.32% | 5.05% |
| 2017 | 1.24% | 0.65% |
| 2016 | 1.67% | 1.53% |
| 2015 | 2.01% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.32% | 7.15% |
| 2013 | 0.60% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 4.50% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 9.37% | 10.67% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.77% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.18% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 7.34% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.96% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.99% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks