StockComparison Logo
vs

GOOD vs PAR

Comparison between Gladstone Commercial Corp (GOOD, Company) and Par Technology Corp (PAR, Company).

GOOD is from the Real Estate sector, while PAR is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceGOOD has outperformed PAR, delivering a return of -3.2% compared to -24.7%

GOOD vs PAR - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
GOOD
$629M
Winner
PAR
$633M
Max Drawdown
Winner
GOOD
73.73%
PAR
88.42%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
GOOD
0.12
PAR
-1.89
5Y Beta
Winner
GOOD
0.45
PAR
1.37
Industry
GOOD
Reit - Diversified
PAR
Software - Application
P/E Ratio
GOOD
29.53
Winner
PAR
-8.19
Forward P/E
GOOD
52.36
Winner
PAR
9.27
PEG Ratio
GOOD
N/A
PAR
-0.00
Dividend Yield
GOOD
9.21%
PAR
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
GOOD
-4.40%
PAR
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
GOOD
3.84%
PAR
2.39%
Debt to Equity
GOOD
511.62%
Winner
PAR
51.37%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
GOOD
14.04%
PAR
-4.72%

GOOD vs PAR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
GOOD
+5.53%
PAR
+1.04%
3M
GOOD
+4.47%
Winner
PAR
+15.80%
6M
Winner
GOOD
+16.72%
PAR
-50.82%
1Y
Winner
GOOD
+1.72%
PAR
-78.18%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
GOOD
-3.25%
PAR
-24.72%
10Y(CAGR)
GOOD
+4.87%
Winner
PAR
+11.61%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
GOOD
+7.69%
PAR
+6.40%

GOOD vs PAR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearGOODPAR
2026+24.51%-56.51%
2025-27.71%-49.27%
2024+33.12%+70.23%
2023-22.93%+64.05%
2022-21.83%-50.95%
2021+56.45%-12.39%
2020-7.47%+98.83%
2019+30.45%+39.85%
2018-6.71%+136.41%
2017+11.63%+70.00%
2016+53.74%-13.35%
2015-7.62%+12.73%
2014+4.17%+14.95%
2013+7.43%+9.44%
2012+10.39%+23.12%
2011+0.80%-34.11%
2010+53.14%-5.46%
2009+68.57%+0.70%
2008-46.07%-26.97%
2007-6.25%-13.37%
2006+31.90%-51.23%
2005+1.83%+146.76%
2004+6.14%+44.39%
2003+13.16%+16.30%
2002N/A+165.39%
2001N/A+38.66%
2000N/A-62.94%
1999N/A+5.56%

GOOD vs PAR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GOOD was -67.15%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 869 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for PAR was -88.42%, occurring on Nov 25, 2008. Recovery took 3301 trading sessions.

The current GOOD drawdown is -26.63%. The current PAR drawdown is -82.48%.

RankGOODPAR
#1-67.15%
Oct 27, 2006 - Apr 14, 2010
-88.42%
Jul 22, 2005 - Aug 31, 2018
#2-66.25%
Nov 1, 2019 - Apr 29, 2021
-86.68%
Feb 22, 2021 - Apr 10, 2026
#3-53.23%
Dec 31, 2021 - May 16, 2023
-72.99%
Feb 8, 2000 - Oct 18, 2002
#4-26.07%
Mar 20, 2015 - Apr 25, 2016
-69.20%
Jan 29, 2020 - Aug 6, 2020
#5-25.84%
Nov 29, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019
-44.14%
Dec 3, 2002 - Dec 2, 2003
#6-22.75%
May 31, 2011 - Jan 30, 2012
-37.19%
Aug 31, 2018 - Feb 13, 2019
#7-15.90%
May 17, 2013 - Feb 27, 2015
-32.11%
Apr 5, 2004 - Jan 25, 2005
#8-14.43%
Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 25, 2010
-25.21%
Jun 10, 2019 - Nov 8, 2019
#9-13.35%
Feb 3, 2012 - Aug 29, 2012
-22.66%
Feb 25, 2019 - May 28, 2019
#10-13.21%
Sep 23, 2016 - Nov 16, 2016
-19.81%
Sep 28, 2020 - Nov 11, 2020
#11-12.59%
Apr 18, 2017 - Sep 26, 2017
-16.28%
Nov 19, 1999 - Jan 19, 2000
#12-11.64%
Apr 4, 2006 - Aug 23, 2006
-15.49%
Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 2, 2021
#13-10.68%
Jun 25, 2010 - Oct 5, 2010
-13.90%
Mar 5, 2004 - Apr 1, 2004
#14-10.44%
Dec 23, 2004 - Aug 31, 2005
-12.12%
Dec 17, 2020 - Jan 14, 2021
#15-10.20%
Sep 24, 2012 - Jan 10, 2013
-11.69%
Jun 17, 2005 - Jul 12, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between GOOD and PAR is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.75
-101

Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)

GOOD vs PAR dividend yield comparison.

YearGOODPAR
20264.69%0.00%
202511.25%0.00%
20247.39%0.00%
20239.06%0.00%
20228.13%0.00%
20215.83%0.00%
20208.35%0.00%
20196.86%1.01%
20188.37%0.00%
20177.12%0.00%
20167.46%0.00%
201510.28%0.00%
20148.74%0.00%
20138.35%0.00%
20128.36%0.00%
20118.55%0.00%
20107.97%0.00%
200911.19%0.00%
200817.65%0.00%
20078.21%0.00%
20067.15%0.00%
20055.82%0.00%
20042.81%0.00%
20030.06%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare