GLO vs NHS

Comparison between Clough Global Opportunities Fund. (GLO, ETF) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceNHS has outperformed GLO, delivering a return of -1.8% compared to -2.6%

GLO vs NHS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GLO(ETF)	NHS(ETF)
Net Assets	$285M	$285M
Max Drawdown	79.67%	73.16%
Sharpe Ratio	1.38	-0.45
5Y Beta	0.75	0.37
5Y Dividends CAGR	-10.30%	1.63%

Net Assets

Winner

GLO

$285M

NHS

$285M

Max Drawdown

GLO

79.67%

Winner

NHS

73.16%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

GLO

1.38

NHS

-0.45

5Y Beta

GLO

0.75

Winner

NHS

0.37

5Y Dividends CAGR

GLO

-10.30%

Winner

NHS

1.63%

GLO vs NHS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GLO	NHS
1 month	+1.60%	-1.37%
3 months	+5.84%	-13.07%
6 months	+9.02%	-5.62%
1 year	+24.36%	-2.54%
5 years(CAGR)	-2.58%	-1.79%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.13%	+5.27%
Max(CAGR)	+4.41%	+6.80%

Winner

GLO

+1.60%

NHS

-1.37%

Winner

GLO

+5.84%

NHS

-13.07%

Winner

GLO

+9.02%

NHS

-5.62%

Winner

GLO

+24.36%

NHS

-2.54%

5Y(CAGR)

GLO

-2.58%

Winner

NHS

-1.79%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

GLO

+7.13%

NHS

+5.27%

Max(CAGR)

GLO

+4.41%

Winner

NHS

+6.80%

GLO vs NHS - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GLO	NHS
2026	+8.51%	-8.80%
2025	+24.49%	+13.55%
2024	+23.14%	+10.34%
2023	+3.30%	+3.61%
2022	-45.57%	-23.51%
2021	+6.66%	+16.38%
2020	+31.79%	+5.34%
2019	+25.33%	+38.45%
2018	-16.44%	-11.00%
2017	+35.75%	+8.92%
2016	-1.84%	+26.03%
2015	-9.49%	-10.40%
2014	+11.62%	+0.67%
2013	+18.10%	+1.87%
2012	+19.84%	+9.26%
2011	-15.22%	+9.17%
2010	+10.71%	+24.93%
2009	+48.07%	+103.49%
2008	-46.95%	-37.64%
2007	+11.99%	-13.02%
2006	-6.80%	+6.05%
2005	N/A	+6.36%
2004	N/A	+15.56%
2003	N/A	+10.45%

GLO vs NHS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GLO was -60.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1160 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NHS was -64.75%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 577 trading sessions.

The current GLO drawdown is -20.41%. The current NHS drawdown is -14.65%.

Rank	GLO	NHS
#1	-60.53% Jun 5, 2008 - Jan 14, 2013	-64.75% Jun 4, 2007 - Sep 16, 2009
#2	-58.44% Nov 8, 2021 - Oct 27, 2023	-43.00% Feb 21, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020
#3	-44.43% Feb 21, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020	-37.40% Nov 12, 2021 - Feb 4, 2026
#4	-30.06% Sep 4, 2018 - Jan 14, 2020	-24.62% Jun 30, 2014 - Aug 10, 2016
#5	-25.75% Apr 15, 2015 - Apr 10, 2017	-21.48% May 26, 2011 - Feb 13, 2012
#6	-14.96% May 12, 2006 - Dec 24, 2007	-18.05% Oct 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019
#7	-14.13% Jan 3, 2008 - May 8, 2008	-17.01% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026
#8	-11.76% Jul 1, 2014 - Dec 31, 2014	-15.06% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 24, 2010
#9	-10.61% Oct 13, 2020 - Nov 16, 2020	-14.76% Mar 19, 2004 - Aug 30, 2004
#10	-9.64% May 3, 2021 - Jun 29, 2021	-13.33% Sep 28, 2012 - Feb 26, 2014
#11	-8.07% Nov 10, 2017 - Jan 23, 2018	-12.17% Jan 10, 2006 - Sep 20, 2006
#12	-8.00% May 20, 2013 - Dec 23, 2013	-11.90% Dec 31, 2004 - Jul 8, 2005
#13	-7.53% Aug 16, 2021 - Oct 28, 2021	-10.06% Oct 13, 2010 - Jan 31, 2011
#14	-7.10% Jan 29, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018	-9.11% Oct 25, 2016 - Jan 4, 2017
#15	-6.94% Jun 29, 2021 - Aug 5, 2021	-6.95% Sep 23, 2009 - Dec 14, 2009

Correlation

Correlation between GLO and NHS is 0.90 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.90

-101

Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)

GLO vs NHS dividend yield comparison.

Year	GLO	NHS
2026	4.54%	7.16%
2025	10.62%	14.59%
2024	11.25%	14.49%
2023	12.33%	14.06%
2022	22.32%	12.74%
2021	12.26%	8.73%
2020	9.69%	9.28%
2019	11.12%	7.99%
2018	14.48%	8.37%
2017	10.11%	7.59%
2016	12.63%	8.23%
2015	11.49%	9.81%
2014	11.00%	8.79%
2013	8.26%	8.15%
2012	9.20%	7.92%
2011	10.22%	9.23%
2010	8.03%	9.60%
2009	7.69%	10.56%
2008	16.35%	20.70%
2007	8.12%	14.30%
2006	3.30%	8.91%
2005	0.00%	10.23%
2004	0.00%	10.01%
2003	0.00%	3.88%