GLDD vs QDEL

Comparison between Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD, Company) and QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL, Company).

GLDD is from the Industrials sector, while QDEL is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceGLDD has outperformed QDEL, delivering a return of +3.0% compared to -35.6%

GLDD vs QDEL - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GLDD(COMPANY)	QDEL(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.14B	$1.14B
Max Drawdown	81.14%	96.70%
Sharpe Ratio	1.43	-0.12
5Y Beta	1.00	1.74
Industry	Engineering & Construction	Medical Devices
P/E Ratio	15.53	-0.93
Forward P/E	15.17	7.23
PEG Ratio	0.55	-0.00
5Y Dividends CAGR	79.07%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	1.43%	N/A
Debt to Equity	73.13%	12.33%
Free Cash Flow Yield	8.76%	-14.03%
P/S Ratio	1.28	0.43
P/B Ratio	2.19	0.60

Market Cap

GLDD

$1.14B

Winner

QDEL

$1.14B

Max Drawdown

Winner

GLDD

81.14%

QDEL

96.70%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

GLDD

1.43

QDEL

-0.12

5Y Beta

Winner

GLDD

1.00

QDEL

1.74

Industry

GLDD

Engineering & Construction

QDEL

Medical Devices

P/E Ratio

GLDD

15.53

Winner

QDEL

-0.93

Forward P/E

GLDD

15.17

Winner

QDEL

7.23

PEG Ratio

GLDD

0.55

Winner

QDEL

-0.00

5Y Dividends CAGR

GLDD

79.07%

QDEL

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

GLDD

1.43%

QDEL

N/A

Debt to Equity

GLDD

73.13%

Winner

QDEL

12.33%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

GLDD

8.76%

QDEL

-14.03%

P/S Ratio

GLDD

1.28

Winner

QDEL

0.43

P/B Ratio

GLDD

2.19

Winner

QDEL

0.60

GLDD vs QDEL - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GLDD	QDEL
1 month	+0.00%	+38.92%
3 months	+0.00%	+47.51%
6 months	+10.32%	-40.98%
1 year	+49.12%	-37.67%
5 years(CAGR)	+2.95%	-35.65%
10 years(CAGR)	+14.24%	-1.63%
Max(CAGR)	+5.60%	+5.53%

GLDD

+0.00%

Winner

QDEL

+38.92%

GLDD

+0.00%

Winner

QDEL

+47.51%

Winner

GLDD

+10.32%

QDEL

-40.98%

Winner

GLDD

+49.12%

QDEL

-37.67%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

GLDD

+2.95%

QDEL

-35.65%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

GLDD

+14.24%

QDEL

-1.63%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

GLDD

+5.60%

QDEL

+5.53%

GLDD vs QDEL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GLDD	QDEL
2026	+28.21%	-42.39%
2025	+12.52%	-36.59%
2024	+48.16%	-40.39%
2023	+33.33%	-13.29%
2022	-62.97%	-36.21%
2021	+21.30%	-29.06%
2020	+12.95%	+140.17%
2019	+67.60%	+54.41%
2018	+26.10%	+9.88%
2017	+20.00%	+107.61%
2016	+8.81%	+6.83%
2015	-52.74%	-24.29%
2014	-4.36%	-1.97%
2013	-3.36%	+55.46%
2012	+57.85%	+19.60%
2011	-24.64%	+2.65%
2010	+13.42%	+6.48%
2009	+63.45%	+3.45%
2008	-50.26%	-31.21%
2007	+34.42%	+44.01%
2006	+0.00%	+30.96%
2005	N/A	+116.06%
2004	N/A	-58.02%
2003	N/A	+191.87%
2002	N/A	-56.25%
2001	N/A	+43.90%
2000	N/A	-27.49%
1999	N/A	+74.58%

GLDD vs QDEL Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GLDD was -80.77%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1394 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for QDEL was -96.70%, occurring on May 11, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current QDEL drawdown is -94.51%.

Rank	GLDD	QDEL
#1	-80.77% Jun 20, 2007 - Jan 2, 2013	-96.70% Aug 5, 2020 - May 11, 2026
#2	-70.32% May 3, 2021 - Feb 11, 2026	-81.06% Mar 9, 2000 - Dec 26, 2003
#3	-69.69% Feb 19, 2013 - Apr 30, 2019	-77.42% Jan 26, 2004 - Nov 7, 2005
#4	-43.07% Jan 6, 2020 - Dec 18, 2020	-62.00% Oct 30, 2007 - Jan 4, 2013
#5	-20.22% Jul 12, 2019 - Dec 11, 2019	-56.26% Jan 15, 2014 - Jul 17, 2017
#6	-13.20% Mar 12, 2021 - Apr 23, 2021	-47.52% Nov 25, 2005 - Oct 26, 2006
#7	-10.71% Jan 9, 2007 - Feb 20, 2007	-42.05% Aug 31, 2018 - Jan 8, 2020
#8	-10.20% Feb 23, 2007 - Apr 16, 2007	-35.48% Oct 30, 2006 - Jun 25, 2007
#9	-8.81% May 3, 2019 - Jul 1, 2019	-26.85% Jan 6, 2000 - Feb 18, 2000
#10	-7.23% Feb 24, 2021 - Mar 12, 2021	-26.53% Jul 9, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007
#11	-6.84% Jan 7, 2021 - Feb 8, 2021	-26.47% May 11, 2020 - Jun 19, 2020
#12	-6.46% Jun 5, 2007 - Jun 19, 2007	-18.42% Jul 19, 2013 - Dec 31, 2013
#13	-5.85% Dec 11, 2019 - Jan 6, 2020	-17.99% Oct 11, 2017 - Dec 20, 2017
#14	-5.84% Feb 16, 2021 - Feb 24, 2021	-17.26% Mar 11, 2020 - Mar 17, 2020
#15	-5.70% Jan 9, 2013 - Feb 13, 2013	-17.14% Mar 6, 2013 - Jun 4, 2013