StockComparison Logo
vs

GIS vs CHRW

Comparison between General Mills Inc (GIS, Company) and C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc (CHRW, Company).

GIS is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while CHRW is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHRW has outperformed GIS, delivering a return of +13.9% compared to -5.3%

GIS vs CHRW - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
GIS
$20B
Winner
CHRW
$21B
Max Drawdown
GIS
64.50%
Winner
CHRW
43.44%
Sharpe Ratio
GIS
-0.91
Winner
CHRW
0.87
5Y Beta
Winner
GIS
-0.02
CHRW
0.67
Industry
GIS
Packaged Foods
CHRW
Integrated Freight & Logistics
P/E Ratio
Winner
GIS
-217.00
CHRW
34.32
Forward P/E
Winner
GIS
11.64
CHRW
25.06
PEG Ratio
GIS
11.74
Winner
CHRW
1.92
Dividend Yield
Winner
GIS
6.78%
CHRW
1.70%
5Y Dividends CAGR
GIS
8.38%
Winner
CHRW
8.94%
5Y EPS CAGR
GIS
N/A
CHRW
2.50%
Debt to Equity
GIS
182.80%
Winner
CHRW
78.79%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
GIS
7.97%
CHRW
4.18%
P/S Ratio
Winner
GIS
1.11
CHRW
1.26
P/B Ratio
Winner
GIS
2.75
CHRW
11.71

GIS vs CHRW - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
GIS
-2.05%
CHRW
-18.49%
3M
Winner
GIS
+6.88%
CHRW
-3.70%
6M
GIS
-22.82%
Winner
CHRW
-21.59%
1Y
GIS
-21.64%
Winner
CHRW
+36.68%
5Y(CAGR)
GIS
-5.27%
Winner
CHRW
+13.94%
10Y(CAGR)
GIS
-2.85%
Winner
CHRW
+11.03%
Max(CAGR)
GIS
+5.27%
Winner
CHRW
+13.62%

GIS vs CHRW - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearGISCHRW
2026-17.01%-4.82%
2025-23.47%+59.79%
2024-1.02%+21.85%
2023-19.36%-1.73%
2022+28.33%-13.31%
2021+18.08%+19.07%
2020+16.71%+23.60%
2019+45.02%-3.44%
2018-31.26%-4.31%
2017-1.15%+25.23%
2016+10.72%+21.44%
2015+11.99%-14.01%
2014+11.42%+32.54%
2013+24.51%-5.32%
2012+3.57%-7.46%
2011+17.50%-12.94%
2010+3.34%+37.38%
2009+21.00%+7.19%
2008+10.38%+7.86%
2007+1.88%+26.85%
2006+19.31%+11.07%
2005+3.57%+36.39%
2004+13.29%+48.07%
2003-2.66%+20.46%
2002-5.66%+9.33%
2001+21.28%-2.53%
2000+33.37%+61.78%
1999-16.74%+20.26%

GIS vs CHRW Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GIS was -59.65%, occurring on Jun 3, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CHRW was -42.38%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 561 trading sessions.

The current GIS drawdown is -53.84%. The current CHRW drawdown is -26.11%.

RankGISCHRW
#1-59.65%
May 12, 2023 - Jun 3, 2026
-42.38%
May 6, 2008 - Jul 28, 2010
#2-45.07%
Jul 19, 2016 - May 13, 2020
-40.56%
Aug 25, 2022 - Dec 12, 2024
#3-31.76%
Oct 1, 2008 - Nov 13, 2009
-37.68%
Sep 10, 2018 - Aug 10, 2020
#4-29.42%
Nov 1, 1999 - Oct 31, 2000
-35.12%
Jul 7, 2011 - Dec 19, 2014
#5-26.09%
Dec 27, 2001 - Dec 23, 2004
-31.29%
Mar 7, 2000 - May 5, 2000
#6-18.07%
Mar 5, 2001 - Sep 10, 2001
-29.84%
Jul 21, 2026 - Jul 30, 2026
#7-15.87%
Aug 4, 2020 - Nov 3, 2021
-27.50%
Jul 3, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007
#8-15.14%
Feb 1, 2005 - May 25, 2006
-27.33%
Dec 8, 2000 - Mar 22, 2002
#9-13.66%
Dec 8, 2022 - Apr 5, 2023
-25.14%
Apr 16, 2002 - Apr 15, 2003
#10-13.11%
Jun 17, 2010 - Apr 20, 2011
-24.72%
Jul 31, 2000 - Dec 7, 2000
#11-12.89%
Dec 6, 2007 - Apr 1, 2008
-23.29%
Dec 12, 2024 - Jul 31, 2025
#12-11.79%
May 19, 2011 - Oct 10, 2011
-20.50%
Jan 6, 2022 - Mar 29, 2022
#13-10.92%
Jan 14, 2022 - Apr 7, 2022
-20.27%
Dec 24, 2014 - Apr 19, 2016
#14-10.66%
Jun 4, 2014 - Jan 20, 2015
-20.07%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jul 14, 2026
#15-10.19%
Jun 4, 2007 - Dec 6, 2007
-19.86%
May 5, 2000 - Jul 12, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between GIS and CHRW is 0.77 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.77
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

GIS vs CHRW dividend yield comparison.

YearGISCHRW
20265.06%0.81%
20255.20%1.55%
20243.73%2.38%
20233.47%2.82%
20222.50%2.47%
20213.03%1.93%
20203.37%2.17%
20193.66%2.57%
20185.03%2.24%
20173.27%2.03%
20163.01%2.38%
20153.00%2.53%
20143.02%1.91%
20132.85%2.40%
20123.14%2.12%
20112.90%1.72%
20102.95%1.30%
20092.54%1.65%
20082.72%1.64%
20072.67%1.40%
20062.40%1.39%
20052.60%0.96%
20042.35%0.92%
20032.43%0.95%
20022.34%0.83%
20012.11%0.73%
20002.47%0.54%
19990.00%0.20%

Select Stocks to Compare