GIC vs AMN

Comparison between Global Industrial Company (GIC, Company) and AMN Healthcare Services Inc (AMN, Company).

GIC is from the Industrials sector, while AMN is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceGIC has outperformed AMN, delivering a return of +1.5% compared to -19.6%

GIC vs AMN - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GIC(COMPANY)	AMN(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.33B	$1.32B
Max Drawdown	90.96%	89.99%
Sharpe Ratio	0.81	1.18
5Y Beta	0.69	0.84
Industry	Industrial Distribution	Medical Care Facilities
P/E Ratio	17.73	-39.70
Forward P/E	18.21	26.18
PEG Ratio	1.03	N/A
Dividend Yield	3.10%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	-16.11%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	-19.49%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.80%	53.41%

Market Cap

Winner

GIC

$1.33B

AMN

$1.32B

Max Drawdown

GIC

90.96%

Winner

AMN

89.99%

Sharpe Ratio

GIC

0.81

Winner

AMN

1.18

5Y Beta

Winner

GIC

0.69

AMN

0.84

Industry

GIC

Industrial Distribution

AMN

Medical Care Facilities

P/E Ratio

GIC

17.73

Winner

AMN

-39.70

Forward P/E

Winner

GIC

18.21

AMN

26.18

PEG Ratio

GIC

1.03

AMN

N/A

Dividend Yield

GIC

3.10%

AMN

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

GIC

-16.11%

AMN

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

GIC

-19.49%

AMN

N/A

Debt to Equity

GIC

0.00%

AMN

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

GIC

5.80%

Winner

AMN

53.41%

GIC vs AMN - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GIC	AMN
1 month	+3.95%	+5.89%
3 months	+3.20%	+63.04%
6 months	+14.86%	+61.44%
1 year	+28.53%	+61.21%
5 years(CAGR)	+1.54%	-19.60%
10 years(CAGR)	+22.57%	-2.78%
Max(CAGR)	+9.11%	+1.73%

GIC

+3.95%

Winner

AMN

+5.89%

GIC

+3.20%

Winner

AMN

+63.04%

GIC

+14.86%

Winner

AMN

+61.44%

GIC

+28.53%

Winner

AMN

+61.21%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

GIC

+1.54%

AMN

-19.60%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

GIC

+22.57%

AMN

-2.78%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

GIC

+9.11%

AMN

+1.73%

GIC vs AMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GIC	AMN
2026	+19.47%	+118.78%
2025	+26.68%	-35.80%
2024	-34.10%	-69.11%
2023	+68.28%	-29.36%
2022	-40.61%	-14.88%
2021	+19.16%	+77.50%
2020	+62.62%	+9.89%
2019	+4.64%	+11.97%
2018	-2.84%	+14.23%
2017	+287.09%	+25.64%
2016	+7.44%	+28.68%
2015	-37.23%	+61.47%
2014	+21.84%	+36.68%
2013	+10.08%	+21.99%
2012	-41.47%	+174.35%
2011	+13.64%	-29.68%
2010	-11.76%	-34.89%
2009	+51.70%	+5.72%
2008	-38.21%	-49.07%
2007	+18.33%	-37.56%
2006	+168.88%	+40.22%
2005	-15.45%	+25.67%
2004	+11.04%	-9.09%
2003	+386.13%	+0.65%
2002	-35.15%	-38.28%
2001	+114.29%	+26.50%
2000	-84.74%	N/A
1999	+1.43%	N/A

GIC vs AMN Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GIC was -90.96%, occurring on Dec 21, 2000. Recovery took 1650 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for AMN was -89.99%, occurring on Oct 3, 2011. Recovery took 3313 trading sessions.

The current GIC drawdown is -19.75%. The current AMN drawdown is -73.96%.

Rank	GIC	AMN
#1	-90.96% Feb 8, 2000 - Aug 31, 2006	-89.99% Jun 19, 2002 - Aug 17, 2015
#2	-72.18% Feb 20, 2007 - Aug 3, 2017	-88.11% Nov 1, 2022 - Jan 5, 2026
#3	-55.22% Aug 1, 2018 - Dec 8, 2020	-54.21% Mar 18, 2020 - May 5, 2021
#4	-53.17% Mar 21, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025	-41.17% Sep 23, 2015 - May 6, 2016
#5	-47.96% Apr 23, 2021 - Jan 29, 2024	-39.09% Jul 27, 2016 - Sep 28, 2017
#6	-47.18% Oct 10, 2006 - Jan 4, 2007	-32.09% Apr 25, 2018 - Feb 3, 2020
#7	-21.35% Feb 5, 2021 - Apr 15, 2021	-31.53% Dec 27, 2021 - Oct 28, 2022
#8	-21.20% Nov 4, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000	-23.60% Dec 28, 2001 - Feb 20, 2002
#9	-15.94% Jan 3, 2018 - May 24, 2018	-23.05% Oct 12, 2021 - Dec 27, 2021
#10	-13.59% Nov 1, 2017 - Dec 20, 2017	-16.50% Feb 14, 2020 - Mar 17, 2020
#11	-12.30% Aug 4, 2017 - Sep 18, 2017	-11.82% Oct 3, 2017 - Nov 22, 2017
#12	-11.50% Sep 21, 2006 - Sep 29, 2006	-11.36% Aug 17, 2015 - Sep 23, 2015
#13	-11.46% Jun 18, 2018 - Jul 12, 2018	-11.32% May 10, 2016 - Jun 2, 2016
#14	-9.98% Jan 16, 2007 - Jan 29, 2007	-9.46% Feb 20, 2002 - Apr 4, 2002
#15	-7.54% Feb 15, 2024 - Mar 19, 2024	-8.36% Jun 8, 2016 - Jul 7, 2016