GGT vs CIK

Comparison between Gabelli Multimedia Trust Inc (GGT, ETF) and Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund Inc (CIK, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCIK has outperformed GGT, delivering a return of +2.6% compared to -2.5%

GGT vs CIK - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GGT(ETF)	CIK(ETF)
Net Assets	$150M	$150M
Max Drawdown	87.13%	74.29%
Sharpe Ratio	1.51	-0.75
5Y Beta	0.38	0.39
5Y Dividends CAGR	3.30%	1.09%

Net Assets

Winner

GGT

$150M

CIK

$150M

Max Drawdown

GGT

87.13%

Winner

CIK

74.29%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

GGT

1.51

CIK

-0.75

5Y Beta

Winner

GGT

0.38

CIK

0.39

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

GGT

3.30%

CIK

1.09%

GGT vs CIK - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GGT	CIK
1 month	+1.43%	-0.79%
3 months	+8.98%	-0.41%
6 months	+12.12%	-6.38%
1 year	+31.25%	-5.01%
5 years(CAGR)	-2.46%	+2.58%
10 years(CAGR)	+8.52%	+7.37%
Max(CAGR)	+3.97%	+5.99%

Winner

GGT

+1.43%

CIK

-0.79%

Winner

GGT

+8.98%

CIK

-0.41%

Winner

GGT

+12.12%

CIK

-6.38%

Winner

GGT

+31.25%

CIK

-5.01%

5Y(CAGR)

GGT

-2.46%

Winner

CIK

+2.58%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

GGT

+8.52%

CIK

+7.37%

Max(CAGR)

GGT

+3.97%

Winner

CIK

+5.99%

GGT vs CIK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GGT	CIK
2026	+12.12%	-8.60%
2025	+14.58%	+7.14%
2024	-2.58%	+5.40%
2023	+20.63%	+35.36%
2022	-33.05%	-20.82%
2021	+21.97%	+19.34%
2020	+13.07%	+6.85%
2019	+26.38%	+25.89%
2018	-15.26%	-8.39%
2017	+39.84%	+13.04%
2016	+8.78%	+23.48%
2015	-15.82%	-7.33%
2014	-7.27%	-0.10%
2013	+68.66%	-6.22%
2012	+36.68%	+19.19%
2011	-15.10%	+12.25%
2010	+34.27%	+15.26%
2009	+39.45%	+58.36%
2008	-61.95%	-24.93%
2007	+10.15%	-10.40%
2006	+28.06%	+27.13%
2005	+0.08%	-9.37%
2004	+17.11%	+7.88%
2003	+36.60%	+26.34%
2002	-30.06%	-14.24%
2001	-12.61%	+0.33%
2000	-37.99%	-3.89%
1999	+14.05%	-3.96%

GGT vs CIK Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GGT was -80.99%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 3374 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CIK was -54.28%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 656 trading sessions.

The current GGT drawdown is -17.58%. The current CIK drawdown is -12.40%.

Rank	GGT	CIK
#1	-80.99% Dec 10, 1999 - May 13, 2013	-54.28% May 16, 2007 - Dec 21, 2009
#2	-57.31% Feb 21, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020	-39.09% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020
#3	-49.91% Jul 2, 2021 - Nov 9, 2023	-36.18% Jan 15, 2002 - May 31, 2005
#4	-38.59% Dec 27, 2013 - May 25, 2017	-26.94% Jan 29, 2001 - Jan 15, 2002
#5	-23.78% Jun 14, 2018 - Sep 12, 2019	-26.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 26, 2023
#6	-12.73% Oct 5, 2017 - Jan 22, 2018	-24.22% May 3, 2013 - Dec 12, 2016
#7	-12.13% May 23, 2013 - Jul 5, 2013	-21.26% Jul 13, 2005 - Sep 28, 2006
#8	-7.91% Jun 14, 2021 - Jun 24, 2021	-20.19% Aug 18, 2000 - Jan 26, 2001
#9	-7.89% Jan 29, 2018 - Mar 7, 2018	-17.34% May 27, 2011 - Jan 27, 2012
#10	-7.78% Aug 1, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013	-15.65% Jul 25, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023
#11	-7.35% Mar 21, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018	-15.49% Oct 7, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026
#12	-6.81% Mar 22, 2021 - Apr 13, 2021	-15.16% Oct 3, 2018 - Mar 20, 2019
#13	-6.73% Apr 15, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021	-14.29% May 3, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010
#14	-6.69% Sep 13, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020	-12.39% Feb 2, 2000 - Jul 17, 2000
#15	-6.40% Aug 1, 2017 - Sep 21, 2017	-11.87% Nov 2, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013

Correlation

Correlation between GGT and CIK is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.93

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

GGT vs CIK dividend yield comparison.

Year	GGT	CIK
2026	8.33%	4.20%
2025	20.95%	9.54%
2024	19.58%	9.34%
2023	15.52%	8.63%
2022	16.45%	10.71%
2021	10.14%	7.87%
2020	11.05%	8.57%
2019	10.97%	8.39%
2018	12.75%	9.64%
2017	9.56%	7.98%
2016	11.46%	8.35%
2015	12.53%	9.50%
2014	10.49%	8.39%
2013	7.41%	8.34%
2012	10.19%	7.89%
2011	13.96%	7.99%
2010	7.31%	9.82%
2009	0.00%	9.40%
2008	12.81%	18.80%
2007	5.82%	9.22%
2006	5.14%	9.13%
2005	5.91%	10.76%
2004	0.00%	9.44%
2003	0.00%	10.00%
2002	0.00%	18.04%
2001	0.67%	14.46%
2000	14.55%	5.45%