GGB vs EMN
Comparison between Gerdau S.A. (GGB, Company) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company).
Both GGB and EMN are from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceGGB has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +6.1% compared to -5.2%
GGB vs EMN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GGB vs EMN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GGB vs EMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GGB | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.82% | +15.31% |
| 2025 | +32.73% | -24.53% |
| 2024 | -25.00% | +5.62% |
| 2023 | +0.11% | +13.61% |
| 2022 | +30.84% | -29.62% |
| 2021 | +11.60% | +25.71% |
| 2020 | -6.93% | +32.48% |
| 2019 | +25.39% | +12.06% |
| 2018 | -3.15% | -20.50% |
| 2017 | +10.80% | +25.08% |
| 2016 | +174.03% | +15.91% |
| 2015 | -64.12% | -9.67% |
| 2014 | -52.40% | -3.84% |
| 2013 | -15.68% | +17.63% |
| 2012 | +10.33% | +72.68% |
| 2011 | -43.82% | -6.26% |
| 2010 | -18.86% | +39.87% |
| 2009 | +144.27% | +90.79% |
| 2008 | -51.44% | -45.80% |
| 2007 | +84.62% | +4.61% |
| 2006 | +42.74% | +17.28% |
| 2005 | +54.17% | -6.99% |
| 2004 | +77.91% | +51.49% |
| 2003 | +195.29% | +10.46% |
| 2002 | -1.21% | -1.78% |
| 2001 | +21.40% | -14.35% |
| 2000 | -32.67% | +9.36% |
| 1999 | +50.87% | +27.57% |
GGB vs EMN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GGB was -96.38%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.
The current GGB drawdown is -62.44%. The current EMN drawdown is -32.48%.
| Rank | GGB | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -96.38% Jun 19, 2008 - Jan 21, 2016 | -76.10% May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010 |
| #2 | -67.27% Jan 19, 2000 - Apr 17, 2002 | -62.79% Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #3 | -49.73% Apr 17, 2002 - May 2, 2003 | -49.36% Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #4 | -35.02% Apr 6, 2004 - Jul 2, 2004 | -44.78% May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004 |
| #5 | -33.36% Mar 7, 2005 - Sep 6, 2005 | -37.68% May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 |
| #6 | -31.97% May 2, 2006 - Feb 6, 2007 | -32.81% Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017 |
| #7 | -30.92% Jul 23, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 | -32.78% May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001 |
| #8 | -21.90% Nov 6, 2007 - Feb 25, 2008 | -32.38% Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000 |
| #9 | -20.12% Jan 5, 2004 - Apr 1, 2004 | -25.48% Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -19.03% Oct 4, 2004 - Nov 29, 2004 | -22.79% Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022 |
| #11 | -17.10% Feb 22, 2007 - Apr 4, 2007 | -20.90% Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 |
| #12 | -16.48% Nov 30, 2004 - Feb 18, 2005 | -17.42% Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 |
| #13 | -16.33% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 1, 2005 | -13.98% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013 |
| #14 | -14.38% Sep 12, 2003 - Oct 14, 2003 | -11.60% Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 |
| #15 | -12.32% Feb 27, 2008 - Apr 3, 2008 | -11.57% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between GGB and EMN is 0.09 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
GGB vs EMN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GGB | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.33% | 2.32% |
| 2025 | 3.05% | 5.22% |
| 2024 | 5.06% | 3.57% |
| 2023 | 6.63% | 3.54% |
| 2022 | 12.79% | 3.77% |
| 2021 | 11.48% | 2.34% |
| 2020 | 1.34% | 2.66% |
| 2019 | 1.48% | 3.18% |
| 2018 | 1.60% | 3.15% |
| 2017 | 0.34% | 2.26% |
| 2016 | 0.38% | 2.51% |
| 2015 | 4.16% | 2.46% |
| 2014 | 2.56% | 1.91% |
| 2013 | 1.03% | 1.55% |
| 2012 | 1.54% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 2.38% | 2.53% |
| 2010 | 2.00% | 2.13% |
| 2009 | 0.57% | 2.92% |
| 2008 | 12.10% | 5.55% |
| 2007 | 3.18% | 2.88% |
| 2006 | 3.35% | 2.98% |
| 2005 | 4.94% | 3.41% |
| 2004 | 3.41% | 3.05% |
| 2003 | 3.35% | 4.45% |
| 2002 | 6.38% | 4.79% |
| 2001 | 5.30% | 4.51% |
| 2000 | 6.43% | 3.61% |
| 1999 | 1.52% | 0.92% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks