GFS vs TRI

Comparison between GlobalFoundries Inc (GFS, Company) and Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company).

GFS is from the Technology sector, while TRI is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceGFS has outperformed TRI, delivering a return of +10.9% compared to +0.8%

GFS vs TRI - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GFS(COMPANY)	TRI(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$41B	$40B
Max Drawdown	61.53%	62.25%
Sharpe Ratio	1.70	-1.70
5Y Beta	1.72	0.47
Industry	Semiconductors	Specialty Business Services
P/E Ratio	45.62	26.80
Forward P/E	35.71	20.33
PEG Ratio	1.61	6.25
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.65%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	19.18%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	-22.75%
Debt to Equity	13.73%	20.72%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.49%	4.34%
P/S Ratio	5.80	5.32
P/B Ratio	3.12	3.39

Market Cap

Winner

GFS

$41B

TRI

$40B

Max Drawdown

Winner

GFS

61.53%

TRI

62.25%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

GFS

1.70

TRI

-1.70

5Y Beta

GFS

1.72

Winner

TRI

0.47

Industry

GFS

Semiconductors

TRI

Specialty Business Services

P/E Ratio

GFS

45.62

Winner

TRI

26.80

Forward P/E

GFS

35.71

Winner

TRI

20.33

PEG Ratio

Winner

GFS

1.61

TRI

6.25

Dividend Yield

GFS

N/A

TRI

2.65%

5Y Dividends CAGR

GFS

N/A

TRI

19.18%

5Y EPS CAGR

GFS

N/A

TRI

-22.75%

Debt to Equity

Winner

GFS

13.73%

TRI

20.72%

Free Cash Flow Yield

GFS

2.49%

Winner

TRI

4.34%

P/S Ratio

GFS

5.80

Winner

TRI

5.32

P/B Ratio

Winner

GFS

3.12

TRI

3.39

GFS vs TRI - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GFS	TRI
1 month	+55.06%	+7.86%
3 months	+70.29%	+4.81%
6 months	+117.49%	-31.66%
1 year	+106.23%	-49.40%
5 years(CAGR)	+10.90%	+0.75%
10 years(CAGR)	N/A	+11.00%
Max(CAGR)	+10.90%	+7.67%

Winner

GFS

+55.06%

TRI

+7.86%

Winner

GFS

+70.29%

TRI

+4.81%

Winner

GFS

+117.49%

TRI

-31.66%

Winner

GFS

+106.23%

TRI

-49.40%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

GFS

+10.90%

TRI

+0.75%

10Y(CAGR)

GFS

N/A

TRI

+11.00%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

GFS

+10.90%

TRI

+7.67%

GFS vs TRI - Annual Returns (2002 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GFS	TRI
2026	+101.03%	-25.92%
2025	-17.80%	-17.06%
2024	-26.02%	+12.82%
2023	+17.21%	+28.64%
2022	-19.24%	-0.97%
2021	+40.02%	+51.02%
2020	N/A	+15.80%
2019	N/A	+53.97%
2018	N/A	+14.09%
2017	N/A	+2.50%
2016	N/A	+22.07%
2015	N/A	-2.07%
2014	N/A	+13.45%
2013	N/A	+33.37%
2012	N/A	+12.37%
2011	N/A	-27.57%
2010	N/A	+17.92%
2009	N/A	+16.31%
2008	N/A	-26.04%
2007	N/A	-0.57%
2006	N/A	+22.33%
2005	N/A	+0.75%
2004	N/A	-2.37%
2003	N/A	+37.12%
2002	N/A	-12.38%

GFS vs TRI Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GFS was -61.53%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for TRI was -61.66%, occurring on Feb 23, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current GFS drawdown is -6.11%. The current TRI drawdown is -55.96%.

Rank	GFS	TRI
#1	-61.53% Mar 25, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025	-61.66% Jul 14, 2025 - Feb 23, 2026
#2	-36.62% Nov 29, 2021 - Mar 17, 2022	-56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013
#3	-12.05% Nov 5, 2021 - Nov 18, 2021	-35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020
#4	-8.71% Mar 18, 2022 - Mar 25, 2022	-26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003
#5	-3.36% Nov 18, 2021 - Nov 24, 2021	-24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023
#6	-2.44% Nov 24, 2021 - Nov 29, 2021	-20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018
#7	N/A	-18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004
#8	N/A	-17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016
#9	N/A	-14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023
#10	N/A	-13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005
#11	N/A	-11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025
#12	N/A	-11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014
#13	N/A	-11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006
#14	N/A	-11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015
#15	N/A	-10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007

Correlation

Correlation between GFS and TRI is -0.60 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.60

-101