GFI vs NMR
Comparison between Gold Fields Ltd (GFI, Company) and Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company).
GFI is from the Basic Materials sector, while NMR is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceGFI has outperformed NMR, delivering a return of +35.1% compared to +17.3%
GFI vs NMR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GFI vs NMR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GFI vs NMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GFI | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -18.05% | +12.27% |
| 2025 | +219.66% | +53.57% |
| 2024 | -3.59% | +35.63% |
| 2023 | +38.57% | +21.20% |
| 2022 | +0.90% | -12.30% |
| 2021 | +8.58% | -17.05% |
| 2020 | +43.65% | +3.34% |
| 2019 | +90.08% | +35.43% |
| 2018 | -19.01% | -36.95% |
| 2017 | +35.42% | -0.51% |
| 2016 | +4.62% | +10.26% |
| 2015 | -40.18% | +0.64% |
| 2014 | +40.12% | -23.82% |
| 2013 | -74.12% | +29.46% |
| 2012 | -17.98% | +92.81% |
| 2011 | -14.75% | -52.04% |
| 2010 | +34.79% | -14.33% |
| 2009 | +37.23% | -11.17% |
| 2008 | -33.97% | -49.10% |
| 2007 | -21.28% | -11.80% |
| 2006 | -0.98% | -1.99% |
| 2005 | +47.02% | +34.20% |
| 2004 | -11.51% | -14.69% |
| 2003 | +2.30% | +52.55% |
| 2002 | +196.74% | -13.30% |
| 2001 | +52.73% | -29.05% |
| 2000 | -21.30% | +2.57% |
| 1999 | +6.59% | +11.76% |
GFI vs NMR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GFI was -90.91%, occurring on Nov 17, 2015. Recovery took 4643 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current GFI drawdown is -41.97%. The current NMR drawdown is -53.49%.
| Rank | GFI | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -90.91% May 11, 2006 - Oct 22, 2024 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 |
| #2 | -53.38% Feb 18, 2000 - Jan 10, 2002 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 |
| #3 | -46.53% Jan 28, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 |
| #4 | -44.99% May 21, 2002 - Nov 18, 2005 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 |
| #5 | -30.41% Oct 22, 2024 - Feb 10, 2025 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 |
| #6 | -23.47% Oct 16, 2025 - Dec 22, 2025 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 |
| #7 | -21.90% Feb 1, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 |
| #8 | -20.00% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 9, 2000 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 |
| #9 | -18.81% Apr 16, 2025 - Jun 2, 2025 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 |
| #10 | -17.69% Feb 14, 2002 - Mar 20, 2002 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 |
| #11 | -12.39% Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 10, 2025 | N/A |
| #12 | -12.12% Nov 10, 1999 - Nov 24, 1999 | N/A |
| #13 | -11.84% Mar 27, 2002 - Apr 17, 2002 | N/A |
| #14 | -11.05% Jun 13, 2025 - Jul 22, 2025 | N/A |
| #15 | -10.52% Apr 26, 2002 - May 7, 2002 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between GFI and NMR is 0.09 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
GFI vs NMR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GFI | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.17% | 1.61% |
| 2025 | 1.77% | 4.91% |
| 2024 | 2.94% | 4.29% |
| 2023 | 2.86% | 1.20% |
| 2022 | 3.40% | 3.86% |
| 2021 | 3.24% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.72% | 0.86% |
| 2019 | 0.81% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.61% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.41% | 1.70% |
| 2016 | 1.35% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 0.60% | 3.34% |
| 2014 | 0.72% | 2.44% |
| 2013 | 2.17% | 1.77% |
| 2012 | 3.88% | 1.28% |
| 2011 | 1.56% | 5.11% |
| 2010 | 0.88% | 1.37% |
| 2009 | 1.01% | 0.57% |
| 2008 | 2.38% | 2.85% |
| 2007 | 1.81% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.16% | 2.36% |
| 2005 | 0.64% | 1.07% |
| 2004 | 0.95% | 1.08% |
| 2003 | 2.28% | 1.03% |
| 2002 | 1.95% | 1.05% |
| 2001 | 3.44% | 5.57% |
| 2000 | 0.76% | 6.49% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks