GFI vs MTB
Comparison between Gold Fields Ltd (GFI, Company) and M & T Bank Corp (MTB, Company).
GFI is from the Basic Materials sector, while MTB is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceGFI has outperformed MTB, delivering a return of +31.8% compared to +9.0%
GFI vs MTB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GFI vs MTB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GFI vs MTB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GFI | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -3.65% | +3.83% |
| 2025 | +219.66% | +10.48% |
| 2024 | -3.59% | +39.71% |
| 2023 | +38.57% | -1.61% |
| 2022 | +0.90% | -5.85% |
| 2021 | +8.58% | +24.76% |
| 2020 | +43.65% | -22.69% |
| 2019 | +90.08% | +20.18% |
| 2018 | -19.01% | -14.69% |
| 2017 | +35.42% | +11.15% |
| 2016 | +4.62% | +36.28% |
| 2015 | -40.18% | -1.12% |
| 2014 | +40.12% | +11.72% |
| 2013 | -74.12% | +18.22% |
| 2012 | -17.98% | +30.33% |
| 2011 | -14.75% | -10.03% |
| 2010 | +34.79% | +34.50% |
| 2009 | +37.23% | +23.24% |
| 2008 | -33.97% | -25.55% |
| 2007 | -21.28% | -31.82% |
| 2006 | -0.98% | +12.19% |
| 2005 | +47.02% | +4.73% |
| 2004 | -11.51% | +12.23% |
| 2003 | +2.30% | +22.06% |
| 2002 | +196.74% | +10.99% |
| 2001 | +52.73% | +13.92% |
| 2000 | -21.30% | +69.50% |
| 1999 | +6.59% | -16.09% |
GFI vs MTB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GFI was -90.91%, occurring on Nov 17, 2015. Recovery took 4643 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MTB was -73.52%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1428 trading sessions.
The current GFI drawdown is -31.77%. The current MTB drawdown is -10.99%.
| Rank | GFI | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -90.91% May 11, 2006 - Oct 22, 2024 | -73.52% Feb 20, 2007 - Oct 17, 2012 |
| #2 | -53.38% Feb 18, 2000 - Jan 10, 2002 | -52.97% Mar 9, 2018 - Jan 7, 2022 |
| #3 | -44.99% May 21, 2002 - Nov 18, 2005 | -40.69% Sep 12, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 |
| #4 | -34.47% Jan 28, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026 | -28.19% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 8, 2026 |
| #5 | -30.41% Oct 22, 2024 - Feb 10, 2025 | -26.75% Nov 2, 1999 - Aug 4, 2000 |
| #6 | -23.47% Oct 16, 2025 - Dec 22, 2025 | -23.95% May 17, 2002 - May 30, 2003 |
| #7 | -21.90% Feb 1, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006 | -23.47% Jul 22, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016 |
| #8 | -20.00% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 9, 2000 | -19.77% Jul 20, 2001 - Mar 14, 2002 |
| #9 | -18.81% Apr 16, 2025 - Jun 2, 2025 | -18.02% Feb 16, 2022 - Aug 10, 2022 |
| #10 | -17.69% Feb 14, 2002 - Mar 20, 2002 | -16.99% Feb 6, 2026 - Mar 19, 2026 |
| #11 | -12.39% Apr 1, 2025 - Apr 10, 2025 | -16.08% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 1, 2017 |
| #12 | -12.12% Nov 10, 1999 - Nov 24, 1999 | -15.04% Dec 30, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004 |
| #13 | -11.84% Mar 27, 2002 - Apr 17, 2002 | -13.61% Jan 14, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022 |
| #14 | -11.05% Jun 13, 2025 - Jul 22, 2025 | -12.43% Mar 7, 2001 - Mar 30, 2001 |
| #15 | -10.52% Apr 26, 2002 - May 7, 2002 | -12.30% Dec 5, 2014 - Mar 20, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between GFI and MTB is 0.46 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
GFI vs MTB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GFI | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.54% | 0.71% |
| 2025 | 1.77% | 3.24% |
| 2024 | 2.94% | 2.85% |
| 2023 | 2.86% | 3.79% |
| 2022 | 3.40% | 3.31% |
| 2021 | 3.24% | 2.93% |
| 2020 | 1.72% | 3.46% |
| 2019 | 0.81% | 2.42% |
| 2018 | 1.61% | 2.48% |
| 2017 | 1.41% | 1.75% |
| 2016 | 1.35% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 0.60% | 2.31% |
| 2014 | 0.72% | 2.23% |
| 2013 | 2.17% | 2.41% |
| 2012 | 3.88% | 2.84% |
| 2011 | 1.56% | 3.67% |
| 2010 | 0.88% | 3.22% |
| 2009 | 1.01% | 4.19% |
| 2008 | 2.38% | 4.88% |
| 2007 | 1.81% | 3.19% |
| 2006 | 1.16% | 1.84% |
| 2005 | 0.64% | 1.60% |
| 2004 | 0.95% | 1.48% |
| 2003 | 2.28% | 1.22% |
| 2002 | 1.95% | 1.32% |
| 2001 | 3.44% | 1.37% |
| 2000 | 0.76% | 0.92% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.30% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks