GEO vs BMI
Comparison between Geo Group Inc (GEO, Company) and Badger Meter Inc (BMI, Company).
GEO is from the Industrials sector, while BMI is from the Technology sector.
5-Year PerformanceGEO has outperformed BMI, delivering a return of +30.9% compared to +7.7%
GEO vs BMI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GEO vs BMI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GEO vs BMI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GEO | BMI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +78.59% | -24.88% |
| 2025 | -43.02% | -17.00% |
| 2024 | +160.04% | +36.49% |
| 2023 | +1.03% | +41.75% |
| 2022 | +39.49% | +3.34% |
| 2021 | -8.78% | +18.12% |
| 2020 | -38.82% | +48.79% |
| 2019 | -4.85% | +34.38% |
| 2018 | -11.14% | +4.76% |
| 2017 | +3.52% | +31.08% |
| 2016 | +36.77% | +31.60% |
| 2015 | -23.54% | +1.40% |
| 2014 | +34.65% | +13.47% |
| 2013 | +18.78% | +12.01% |
| 2012 | +102.43% | +62.60% |
| 2011 | -31.86% | -33.73% |
| 2010 | +9.02% | +10.25% |
| 2009 | +15.77% | +30.02% |
| 2008 | -36.15% | -34.27% |
| 2007 | +56.31% | +67.19% |
| 2006 | +152.76% | +41.45% |
| 2005 | -11.94% | +32.42% |
| 2004 | +13.98% | +62.34% |
| 2003 | +101.41% | +26.40% |
| 2002 | -20.36% | +48.91% |
| 2001 | +86.29% | +1.44% |
| 2000 | -35.24% | -20.97% |
| 1999 | -9.66% | -4.18% |
GEO vs BMI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GEO was -77.74%, occurring on May 26, 2021. Recovery took 1897 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BMI was -68.22%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 1420 trading sessions.
The current GEO drawdown is -19.52%. The current BMI drawdown is -47.64%.
| Rank | GEO | BMI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -77.74% Apr 26, 2017 - Nov 7, 2024 | -68.22% Aug 8, 2008 - Apr 1, 2014 |
| #2 | -65.29% Sep 18, 2007 - Dec 7, 2012 | -55.07% Jun 3, 2025 - Apr 20, 2026 |
| #3 | -62.49% Jan 17, 2025 - Feb 20, 2026 | -42.62% Apr 3, 2000 - Aug 29, 2002 |
| #4 | -53.63% Nov 1, 1999 - May 18, 2001 | -38.97% Feb 20, 2020 - Oct 9, 2020 |
| #5 | -51.32% Mar 6, 2002 - Jul 10, 2003 | -36.13% May 2, 2006 - Jul 19, 2007 |
| #6 | -51.28% Mar 20, 2015 - Jan 18, 2017 | -35.11% Aug 5, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 |
| #7 | -35.65% Feb 8, 2005 - Mar 31, 2006 | -33.19% Dec 8, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022 |
| #8 | -29.61% Apr 6, 2004 - Dec 21, 2004 | -28.05% Dec 11, 2024 - May 13, 2025 |
| #9 | -20.24% Nov 2, 2001 - Jan 31, 2002 | -22.37% Feb 20, 2003 - Aug 25, 2003 |
| #10 | -19.53% May 10, 2013 - Aug 6, 2014 | -21.13% Dec 26, 2007 - Mar 27, 2008 |
| #11 | -18.66% Jul 23, 2001 - Oct 31, 2001 | -20.36% Aug 14, 2023 - Apr 18, 2024 |
| #12 | -18.41% May 22, 2006 - Jul 19, 2006 | -20.12% Jul 19, 2007 - Aug 16, 2007 |
| #13 | -18.28% Jan 15, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004 | -19.51% Jun 9, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 |
| #14 | -14.83% Jun 12, 2001 - Jul 23, 2001 | -19.13% Oct 12, 2017 - Jul 20, 2018 |
| #15 | -14.42% Nov 10, 2006 - Jan 16, 2007 | -18.52% Aug 29, 2002 - Feb 20, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between GEO and BMI is 0.62 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
GEO vs BMI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GEO | BMI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.61% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 0.85% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 0.64% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 0.78% |
| 2021 | 3.23% | 0.71% |
| 2020 | 20.09% | 0.74% |
| 2019 | 11.56% | 0.99% |
| 2018 | 9.54% | 1.14% |
| 2017 | 7.95% | 1.03% |
| 2016 | 7.24% | 1.16% |
| 2015 | 8.68% | 1.33% |
| 2014 | 5.77% | 1.25% |
| 2013 | 6.36% | 1.28% |
| 2012 | 21.56% | 1.39% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 2.04% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.18% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.16% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| 2007 | 7.14% | 0.76% |
| 2006 | 4.00% | 1.12% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.48% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.60% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.78% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 3.18% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 4.47% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.74% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.60% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks