GCC vs MNA
Comparison between WISDOMTREE ENHANCED COMMODITY STRATEGY FUND (GCC, ETF) and NYLI MERGER ARBITRAGE ETF (MNA, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceGCC has outperformed MNA, delivering a return of +11.5% compared to +2.1%
GCC vs MNA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GCC vs MNA - Holdings Comparison
GCC and MNA have 0 common holdings. Overlap is 0.00%
GCC's top 25 holdings weight is 16.60%. MNA's top 25 holdings weight is 75.33%.
| Rank | GCC | MNA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | WISDOMTREE FLOATING RATE TREASURY ETF (USFR) - 16.60% | TECK RESOURCES LTD CLASS B (SUB VOTING) (n/a) - 4.78% |
| #2 | N/A | NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP (NSC) - 4.14% |
| #3 | N/A | ELECTRONIC ARTS INC (EA) - 3.88% |
| #4 | N/A | REC BKH US SMS (n/a) - 3.72% |
| #5 | N/A | PAY NEE US SMS (n/a) - 3.67% |
| #6 | N/A | DOMINION ENERGY INC (D) - 3.59% |
| #7 | N/A | NORTHWESTERN ENERGY GROUP INC (NWE) - 3.59% |
| #8 | N/A | CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) - 3.53% |
| #9 | N/A | REC UNP US SMS (n/a) - 3.52% |
| #10 | N/A | CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT INC (CZR) - 3.13% |
| #11 | N/A | n/a (WBD) - 3.12% |
| #12 | N/A | KENVUE INC (KVUE) - 3.06% |
| #13 | N/A | THE AES CORP (AES) - 3.04% |
| #14 | N/A | ARC RESOURCES LTD (n/a) - 2.86% |
| #15 | N/A | TAYLOR MORRISON HOME CORP (TMHC) - 2.71% |
| #16 | N/A | ORGANON & CO ORDINARY SHARES (OGN) - 2.69% |
| #17 | N/A | EQUITABLE HOLDINGS INC (EQH) - 2.66% |
| #18 | N/A | PAY KMB US SMS (n/a) - 2.54% |
| #19 | N/A | GLOBALSTAR INC (GSAT) - 2.45% |
| #20 | N/A | QORVO INC (QRVO) - 2.30% |
| #21 | N/A | SCHRODERS PLC (n/a) - 2.17% |
| #22 | N/A | WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORP (WBS) - 2.17% |
| #23 | N/A | PENUMBRA INC (PEN) - 2.09% |
| #24 | N/A | FIRST CAPITAL REIT (n/a) - 1.98% |
| #25 | N/A | INPOST SA ORDINARY SHARES (n/a) - 1.94% |
| Total Holdings | 1 | 110 |
GCC vs MNA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GCC vs MNA - Annual Returns (2008 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GCC | MNA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +14.92% | +1.96% |
| 2025 | +19.01% | +8.19% |
| 2024 | +15.79% | +4.83% |
| 2023 | -2.34% | +0.21% |
| 2022 | +7.41% | -1.49% |
| 2021 | +19.32% | -3.36% |
| 2020 | +1.44% | +2.65% |
| 2019 | +7.31% | +5.10% |
| 2018 | -9.54% | +1.70% |
| 2017 | -0.52% | +5.72% |
| 2016 | +5.23% | +4.30% |
| 2015 | -18.49% | +1.45% |
| 2014 | -10.91% | +5.68% |
| 2013 | -11.32% | +7.13% |
| 2012 | -5.88% | +1.16% |
| 2011 | -9.53% | -0.69% |
| 2010 | +22.72% | -2.62% |
| 2009 | +18.85% | +0.96% |
| 2008 | -28.60% | N/A |
GCC vs MNA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GCC was -63.19%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. Recovery took 4450 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MNA was -16.68%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 172 trading sessions.
The current GCC drawdown is -7.74%. The current MNA drawdown is -0.21%.
| Rank | GCC | MNA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -63.19% Jul 2, 2008 - Mar 12, 2026 | -16.68% Jan 24, 2020 - Sep 29, 2020 |
| #2 | -15.86% May 12, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 | -11.94% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 18, 2013 |
| #3 | -12.77% Mar 5, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008 | -10.74% Apr 26, 2021 - Jan 15, 2025 |
| #4 | -5.47% Mar 12, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026 | -5.78% May 28, 2015 - Mar 3, 2016 |
| #5 | -4.97% Feb 8, 2008 - Feb 21, 2008 | -4.83% Jan 24, 2018 - Oct 16, 2018 |
| #6 | -2.07% Jun 18, 2008 - Jun 26, 2008 | -3.98% Jan 8, 2021 - Apr 21, 2021 |
| #7 | -1.41% Apr 16, 2026 - Apr 22, 2026 | -3.90% Jul 23, 2014 - Nov 26, 2014 |
| #8 | -1.34% Mar 3, 2008 - Mar 5, 2008 | -3.04% Aug 8, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #9 | -0.86% May 5, 2026 - May 11, 2026 | -3.00% Jan 31, 2019 - Oct 22, 2019 |
| #10 | -0.62% Feb 26, 2008 - Feb 28, 2008 | -2.85% May 25, 2016 - Sep 2, 2016 |
| #11 | -0.53% Feb 4, 2008 - Feb 6, 2008 | -2.50% Nov 7, 2018 - Jan 15, 2019 |
| #12 | -0.48% Feb 28, 2008 - Mar 3, 2008 | -2.44% Mar 20, 2014 - Jun 17, 2014 |
| #13 | -0.30% Jun 26, 2008 - Jul 1, 2008 | -2.33% Nov 6, 2020 - Jan 8, 2021 |
| #14 | -0.28% Apr 27, 2026 - Apr 29, 2026 | -2.28% Mar 4, 2016 - May 25, 2016 |
| #15 | -0.20% Apr 30, 2026 - May 4, 2026 | -2.26% Sep 30, 2016 - Nov 23, 2016 |
Correlation
Correlation between GCC and MNA is -0.15 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2009 - 2025)
GCC vs MNA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GCC | MNA |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6.64% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 3.51% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 3.68% | 1.20% |
| 2022 | 22.49% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 9.76% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 0.21% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.33% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks