FTS vs CFG

Comparison between Fortis Inc (FTS, Company) and Citizens Financial Group Inc (CFG, Company).

FTS is from the Utilities sector, while CFG is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCFG has outperformed FTS, delivering a return of +13.3% compared to +8.6%

FTS vs CFG - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	FTS(COMPANY)	CFG(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$28B	$29B
Max Drawdown	34.36%	68.00%
Sharpe Ratio	1.30	2.05
5Y Beta	-0.02	1.15
Industry	Utilities - Regulated Electric	Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio	19.91	14.60
Forward P/E	21.93	13.02
PEG Ratio	1.88	0.46
Dividend Yield	4.47%	2.62%
5Y Dividends CAGR	7.87%	7.31%
5Y EPS CAGR	3.80%	3.71%
Debt to Equity	142.25%	47.05%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-4.81%	9.31%

Market Cap

FTS

$28B

Winner

CFG

$29B

Max Drawdown

Winner

FTS

34.36%

CFG

68.00%

Sharpe Ratio

FTS

1.30

Winner

CFG

2.05

5Y Beta

Winner

FTS

-0.02

CFG

1.15

Industry

FTS

Utilities - Regulated Electric

CFG

Banks - Regional

P/E Ratio

FTS

19.91

Winner

CFG

14.60

Forward P/E

FTS

21.93

Winner

CFG

13.02

PEG Ratio

FTS

1.88

Winner

CFG

0.46

Dividend Yield

Winner

FTS

4.47%

CFG

2.62%

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

FTS

7.87%

CFG

7.31%

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

FTS

3.80%

CFG

3.71%

Debt to Equity

FTS

142.25%

Winner

CFG

47.05%

Free Cash Flow Yield

FTS

-4.81%

Winner

CFG

9.31%

FTS vs CFG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	FTS	CFG
1 month	+1.82%	+9.68%
3 months	-1.69%	+19.29%
6 months	+10.83%	+16.45%
1 year	+22.63%	+67.58%
5 years(CAGR)	+8.58%	+13.30%
10 years(CAGR)	+9.92%	+16.54%
Max(CAGR)	+11.96%	+13.36%

FTS

+1.82%

Winner

CFG

+9.68%

FTS

-1.69%

Winner

CFG

+19.29%

FTS

+10.83%

Winner

CFG

+16.45%

FTS

+22.63%

Winner

CFG

+67.58%

5Y(CAGR)

FTS

+8.58%

Winner

CFG

+13.30%

10Y(CAGR)

FTS

+9.92%

Winner

CFG

+16.54%

Max(CAGR)

FTS

+11.96%

Winner

CFG

+13.36%

FTS vs CFG - Annual Returns (2014 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	FTS	CFG
2026	+9.89%	+14.53%
2025	+30.22%	+39.15%
2024	+5.99%	+36.46%
2023	+6.17%	-11.29%
2022	-12.70%	-16.71%
2021	+22.76%	+37.87%
2020	+2.27%	-7.00%
2019	+30.07%	+38.20%
2018	-5.13%	-28.63%
2017	+25.09%	+19.13%
2016	+23.55%	+40.90%
2015	N/A	+7.46%
2014	N/A	+8.17%

FTS vs CFG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FTS was -34.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 271 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CFG was -65.60%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 771 trading sessions.

The current FTS drawdown is -3.40%. The current CFG drawdown is -0.84%.

Rank	FTS	CFG
#1	-34.36% Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 16, 2021	-65.60% Jan 23, 2018 - Feb 16, 2021
#2	-29.96% Apr 6, 2022 - Mar 31, 2025	-56.14% Jan 14, 2022 - Jul 17, 2025
#3	-16.05% Nov 24, 2017 - Mar 12, 2019	-35.12% Jun 5, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016
#4	-14.04% Jul 6, 2016 - Apr 12, 2017	-18.80% May 17, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021
#5	-13.81% Feb 4, 2016 - Mar 7, 2016	-18.32% Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
#6	-7.75% Jan 13, 2016 - Jan 22, 2016	-18.25% Mar 1, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
#7	-7.63% Sep 26, 2019 - Jan 15, 2020	-12.83% Nov 24, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
#8	-6.63% May 7, 2025 - Aug 1, 2025	-10.39% Oct 6, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
#9	-6.49% Dec 31, 2021 - Mar 17, 2022	-10.00% Dec 24, 2014 - Feb 13, 2015
#10	-6.21% Mar 16, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026	-8.93% Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 28, 2021
#11	-6.13% Apr 3, 2025 - Apr 14, 2025	-7.00% Oct 1, 2014 - Oct 29, 2014
#12	-5.83% Sep 8, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017	-6.44% Oct 20, 2021 - Nov 23, 2021
#13	-5.77% Aug 16, 2021 - Dec 14, 2021	-6.42% Dec 27, 2016 - Jan 25, 2017
#14	-5.39% Jun 15, 2021 - Aug 16, 2021	-6.25% Mar 17, 2015 - Apr 23, 2015
#15	-4.76% Apr 17, 2017 - Jun 5, 2017	-5.67% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between FTS and CFG is 0.86 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.86

-101

Dividend Comparison (2014 - 2026)

FTS vs CFG dividend yield comparison.

Year	FTS	CFG
2026	1.67%	1.37%
2025	3.42%	2.94%
2024	4.62%	3.84%
2023	4.50%	5.07%
2022	4.48%	4.11%
2021	3.40%	3.30%
2020	3.54%	4.36%
2019	3.31%	3.35%
2018	3.35%	3.30%
2017	4.43%	1.52%
2016	4.94%	1.29%
2015	0.00%	1.53%
2014	0.00%	0.40%