FTMN vs DHF
Comparison between Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN, ETF) and BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF, ETF).
FTMN vs DHF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
FTMN
$198M
DHF
$198M
Expense Ratio
FTMN
0.35%
DHF
N/A
Max Drawdown
Winner
FTMN
3.34%
DHF
84.99%
Sharpe Ratio
FTMN
-0.07
Winner
DHF
0.14
5Y Beta
Winner
FTMN
0.10
DHF
0.40
5Y Dividends CAGR
FTMN
N/A
DHF
-2.48%
FTMN vs DHF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
FTMN
+1.64%
DHF
+1.15%
3M
FTMN
+1.03%
Winner
DHF
+3.93%
6M
Winner
FTMN
+2.14%
DHF
+1.05%
1Y
FTMN
N/A
DHF
+3.99%
5Y(CAGR)
FTMN
N/A
DHF
+2.73%
10Y(CAGR)
FTMN
N/A
DHF
+5.85%
Max(CAGR)
FTMN
+3.81%
Winner
DHF
+4.38%
FTMN vs DHF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FTMN | DHF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.69% | +0.34% |
| 2025 | +0.61% | +4.42% |
| 2024 | N/A | +20.54% |
| 2023 | N/A | +12.87% |
| 2022 | N/A | -24.19% |
| 2021 | N/A | +11.81% |
| 2020 | N/A | +6.03% |
| 2019 | N/A | +23.77% |
| 2018 | N/A | -10.01% |
| 2017 | N/A | +8.75% |
| 2016 | N/A | +20.76% |
| 2015 | N/A | -5.85% |
| 2014 | N/A | -3.44% |
| 2013 | N/A | +6.16% |
| 2012 | N/A | +2.76% |
| 2011 | N/A | +10.98% |
| 2010 | N/A | +32.33% |
| 2009 | N/A | +77.84% |
| 2008 | N/A | -32.39% |
| 2007 | N/A | -4.39% |
| 2006 | N/A | +17.49% |
| 2005 | N/A | -9.02% |
| 2004 | N/A | -2.32% |
| 2003 | N/A | +56.23% |
| 2002 | N/A | -17.18% |
| 2001 | N/A | -10.03% |
| 2000 | N/A | -30.51% |
| 1999 | N/A | -9.65% |
FTMN vs DHF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FTMN was -3.10%, occurring on Mar 26, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for DHF was -60.22%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 2542 trading sessions.
The current FTMN drawdown is -0.30%. The current DHF drawdown is -3.46%.
| Rank | FTMN | DHF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -3.10% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 26, 2026 | -60.22% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 11, 2009 |
| #2 | -0.56% Nov 11, 2025 - Nov 21, 2025 | -42.95% Feb 20, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020 |
| #3 | -0.51% Nov 28, 2025 - Dec 29, 2025 | -37.83% Jun 30, 2021 - Jul 17, 2025 |
| #4 | -0.34% Jan 14, 2026 - Feb 2, 2026 | -26.16% Jun 23, 2014 - Aug 23, 2016 |
| #5 | -0.33% Feb 12, 2026 - Feb 25, 2026 | -19.30% Oct 2, 2018 - Apr 1, 2019 |
| #6 | -0.28% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 12, 2026 | -17.75% Jun 2, 2011 - Apr 2, 2012 |
| #7 | -0.17% Dec 30, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026 | -14.63% May 8, 2013 - Apr 3, 2014 |
| #8 | -0.13% Jan 7, 2026 - Jan 14, 2026 | -14.00% May 2, 2012 - Jan 29, 2013 |
| #9 | -0.11% Nov 21, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 | -11.38% Nov 10, 2010 - Feb 14, 2011 |
| #10 | -0.06% Feb 5, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 | -11.34% Sep 2, 2016 - Jan 27, 2017 |
| #11 | N/A | -11.34% Apr 5, 2010 - Jul 7, 2010 |
| #12 | N/A | -8.67% Feb 10, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026 |
| #13 | N/A | -7.54% Oct 10, 2017 - Oct 2, 2018 |
| #14 | N/A | -6.34% Jan 12, 2010 - Feb 23, 2010 |
| #15 | N/A | -5.19% Mar 2, 2017 - Apr 10, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between FTMN and DHF is 0.41 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
0.41
-101
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FTMN vs DHF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FTMN | DHF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.34% | 3.63% |
| 2025 | 0.50% | 8.47% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 8.14% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 7.86% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 10.12% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 8.24% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 8.60% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 8.52% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 10.41% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 8.98% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 9.76% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 11.30% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 10.14% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 9.88% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 10.92% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 11.51% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 11.29% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 9.97% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 15.74% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 9.14% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 9.15% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 10.66% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 10.62% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 11.56% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 20.33% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 16.29% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 7.76% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: FTMN vs SPYDHF vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks