FTMH vs DSU
Comparison between Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH, ETF) and BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund Inc (DSU, ETF).
FTMH vs DSU - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
Winner
FTMH
$599M
DSU
$598M
Expense Ratio
FTMH
0.35%
DSU
N/A
Max Drawdown
Winner
FTMH
3.46%
DSU
78.64%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
FTMH
0.29
DSU
-0.25
5Y Beta
Winner
FTMH
0.13
DSU
0.30
5Y Dividends CAGR
FTMH
N/A
DSU
10.80%
FTMH vs DSU - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
FTMH
-0.48%
DSU
-0.85%
3M
Winner
FTMH
+0.77%
DSU
-0.27%
6M
Winner
FTMH
+2.98%
DSU
-0.57%
1Y
FTMH
N/A
DSU
+1.57%
5Y(CAGR)
FTMH
N/A
DSU
+7.16%
10Y(CAGR)
FTMH
N/A
DSU
+7.73%
Max(CAGR)
FTMH
+4.87%
Winner
DSU
+6.56%
FTMH vs DSU - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FTMH | DSU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.15% | +0.10% |
| 2025 | +0.11% | +5.03% |
| 2024 | N/A | +11.83% |
| 2023 | N/A | +29.30% |
| 2022 | N/A | -15.84% |
| 2021 | N/A | +20.28% |
| 2020 | N/A | +2.25% |
| 2019 | N/A | +21.10% |
| 2018 | N/A | -10.89% |
| 2017 | N/A | +10.10% |
| 2016 | N/A | +21.39% |
| 2015 | N/A | -1.18% |
| 2014 | N/A | +0.25% |
| 2013 | N/A | -0.31% |
| 2012 | N/A | +18.15% |
| 2011 | N/A | +10.38% |
| 2010 | N/A | +15.57% |
| 2009 | N/A | +49.57% |
| 2008 | N/A | -48.60% |
| 2007 | N/A | -15.32% |
| 2006 | N/A | +28.62% |
| 2005 | N/A | -0.81% |
| 2004 | N/A | +10.41% |
| 2003 | N/A | +36.60% |
| 2002 | N/A | -2.25% |
| 2001 | N/A | +14.21% |
| 2000 | N/A | -1.28% |
| 1999 | N/A | -5.08% |
FTMH vs DSU Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FTMH was -3.11%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. Recovery took 62 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for DSU was -71.89%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1366 trading sessions.
The current FTMH drawdown is -1.27%. The current DSU drawdown is -2.16%.
| Rank | FTMH | DSU |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -3.11% Feb 27, 2026 - May 28, 2026 | -71.89% Feb 1, 2007 - Jul 3, 2012 |
| #2 | -1.27% Jul 2, 2026 - Jul 21, 2026 | -45.38% Feb 19, 2020 - Jan 15, 2021 |
| #3 | -0.89% Nov 28, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026 | -30.49% May 16, 2002 - Mar 31, 2003 |
| #4 | -0.56% Jan 9, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026 | -24.22% Dec 28, 2021 - Nov 24, 2023 |
| #5 | -0.56% Nov 11, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 | -20.52% Aug 16, 2000 - Jan 18, 2001 |
| #6 | -0.39% Oct 27, 2025 - Nov 11, 2025 | -19.43% Jan 31, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002 |
| #7 | -0.34% Jun 4, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026 | -18.01% Jan 21, 2004 - Oct 5, 2004 |
| #8 | -0.13% Jan 7, 2026 - Jan 9, 2026 | -16.34% May 8, 2013 - Jul 22, 2016 |
| #9 | -0.09% Feb 13, 2026 - Feb 19, 2026 | -14.59% Feb 14, 2025 - May 29, 2025 |
| #10 | -0.08% Jun 18, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 | -14.04% Dec 28, 2004 - Jul 14, 2005 |
| #11 | -0.05% Jun 29, 2026 - Jul 2, 2026 | -13.43% Aug 24, 2018 - Apr 12, 2019 |
| #12 | -0.00% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026 | -12.41% Jul 11, 2003 - Oct 8, 2003 |
| #13 | N/A | -10.74% Oct 4, 2012 - Jan 11, 2013 |
| #14 | N/A | -10.58% Sep 12, 2005 - Jan 12, 2006 |
| #15 | N/A | -10.00% Nov 5, 1999 - Jul 27, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between FTMH and DSU is 0.40 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
0.40
-101
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FTMH vs DSU dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FTMH | DSU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.25% | 7.26% |
| 2025 | 0.86% | 11.63% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 11.01% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 9.70% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 7.56% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 6.21% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 7.96% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 7.43% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 8.41% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 6.98% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 6.60% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 8.07% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 7.96% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 8.47% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 7.77% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 8.35% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 9.08% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 11.56% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 24.45% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 11.73% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 8.86% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 10.30% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 9.46% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 11.24% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 14.34% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 14.43% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 7.55% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: FTMH vs SPYDSU vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks