StockComparison Logo
vs

FT vs RCS

Comparison between Franklin Universal Trust (FT, ETF) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Inc (RCS, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceFT has outperformed RCS, delivering a return of +5.5% compared to +1.2%

FT vs RCS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
Winner
FT
$218M
RCS
$216M
Max Drawdown
Winner
FT
65.18%
RCS
65.91%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
FT
0.20
RCS
-0.97
5Y Beta
Winner
FT
0.29
RCS
0.32
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
FT
4.18%
RCS
-4.74%

FT vs RCS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
FT
-2.35%
Winner
RCS
+3.50%
3M
FT
-2.41%
Winner
RCS
-0.01%
6M
FT
-3.49%
Winner
RCS
-3.16%
1Y
Winner
FT
+4.68%
RCS
-20.76%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
FT
+5.55%
RCS
+1.16%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
FT
+7.89%
RCS
+2.60%
Max(CAGR)
FT
+7.15%
Winner
RCS
+7.70%

FT vs RCS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFTRCS
2026+0.81%-4.04%
2025+16.44%-20.94%
2024+17.47%+40.23%
2023+4.51%+33.89%
2022-13.44%-18.91%
2021+21.55%+6.67%
2020+1.47%-16.70%
2019+30.84%+1.41%
2018-5.40%+13.07%
2017+13.25%+13.48%
2016+24.94%+7.92%
2015-12.94%+4.36%
2014+10.27%+6.25%
2013+3.10%-5.47%
2012+12.59%+10.11%
2011+13.70%+21.54%
2010+17.58%+13.66%
2009+59.78%+27.11%
2008-40.85%-1.60%
2007+7.05%-0.27%
2006+21.52%+7.91%
2005+10.02%-6.23%
2004+10.93%+6.65%
2003+21.38%+12.71%
2002-29.73%+23.57%
2001+16.33%+17.00%
2000+12.12%+16.38%
1999-14.17%-0.34%

FT vs RCS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FT was -54.80%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 708 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for RCS was -46.65%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 1325 trading sessions.

The current FT drawdown is -4.46%. The current RCS drawdown is -28.34%.

RankFTRCS
#1-54.80%
May 16, 2007 - Mar 9, 2010
-46.65%
Mar 29, 2019 - Jul 5, 2024
#2-40.90%
Feb 21, 2020 - May 3, 2021
-35.00%
May 5, 2008 - Sep 9, 2009
#3-40.83%
Apr 15, 2002 - May 16, 2006
-32.92%
Oct 2, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026
#4-23.17%
Dec 28, 2021 - Jul 31, 2024
-32.45%
Dec 5, 2024 - Sep 23, 2025
#5-22.90%
Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 3, 2001
-24.63%
Mar 31, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004
#6-22.53%
Mar 24, 2015 - May 26, 2016
-24.31%
Nov 8, 2005 - Mar 26, 2008
#7-18.10%
Mar 9, 2001 - Nov 28, 2001
-20.44%
Sep 8, 2016 - Apr 25, 2017
#8-13.30%
May 20, 2013 - Apr 16, 2014
-18.69%
Dec 9, 2014 - Dec 2, 2015
#9-12.55%
Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011
-17.57%
Sep 20, 2012 - Feb 11, 2013
#10-12.20%
Sep 26, 2012 - Jan 29, 2013
-16.05%
Jul 14, 2017 - Jul 3, 2018
#11-10.78%
Dec 6, 2017 - Feb 25, 2019
-15.13%
Feb 20, 2013 - May 20, 2014
#12-9.94%
Apr 29, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010
-14.85%
Feb 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2005
#13-9.44%
Jul 22, 2016 - Jan 17, 2017
-14.63%
Mar 9, 2010 - Jul 23, 2010
#14-8.76%
Mar 3, 2025 - Jun 12, 2025
-14.11%
Aug 11, 2010 - Feb 28, 2011
#15-7.68%
Nov 3, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015
-13.44%
May 20, 2011 - Nov 4, 2011

Correlation

Correlation between FT and RCS is 0.94 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.94
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

FT vs RCS dividend yield comparison.

YearFTRCS
20264.39%6.06%
20256.37%8.62%
20246.98%8.03%
20237.67%10.07%
20228.49%12.39%
20216.00%9.01%
20205.13%9.57%
20194.95%8.44%
20186.05%8.93%
20175.36%9.50%
20166.53%10.92%
20158.28%11.17%
20147.24%10.79%
20136.64%11.35%
20125.92%10.97%
20116.82%12.42%
20107.20%13.84%
20097.86%13.00%
200812.16%14.29%
20076.60%8.43%
20066.58%8.07%
20056.82%8.40%
20045.96%8.19%
20036.79%7.31%
200214.57%8.48%
20019.85%8.72%
20004.50%4.41%

Select Stocks to Compare