FT vs RCS
Comparison between Franklin Universal Trust (FT, ETF) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Inc (RCS, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFT has outperformed RCS, delivering a return of +5.5% compared to +1.2%
FT vs RCS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FT vs RCS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FT vs RCS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FT | RCS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.81% | -4.04% |
| 2025 | +16.44% | -20.94% |
| 2024 | +17.47% | +40.23% |
| 2023 | +4.51% | +33.89% |
| 2022 | -13.44% | -18.91% |
| 2021 | +21.55% | +6.67% |
| 2020 | +1.47% | -16.70% |
| 2019 | +30.84% | +1.41% |
| 2018 | -5.40% | +13.07% |
| 2017 | +13.25% | +13.48% |
| 2016 | +24.94% | +7.92% |
| 2015 | -12.94% | +4.36% |
| 2014 | +10.27% | +6.25% |
| 2013 | +3.10% | -5.47% |
| 2012 | +12.59% | +10.11% |
| 2011 | +13.70% | +21.54% |
| 2010 | +17.58% | +13.66% |
| 2009 | +59.78% | +27.11% |
| 2008 | -40.85% | -1.60% |
| 2007 | +7.05% | -0.27% |
| 2006 | +21.52% | +7.91% |
| 2005 | +10.02% | -6.23% |
| 2004 | +10.93% | +6.65% |
| 2003 | +21.38% | +12.71% |
| 2002 | -29.73% | +23.57% |
| 2001 | +16.33% | +17.00% |
| 2000 | +12.12% | +16.38% |
| 1999 | -14.17% | -0.34% |
FT vs RCS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FT was -54.80%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 708 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for RCS was -46.65%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 1325 trading sessions.
The current FT drawdown is -4.46%. The current RCS drawdown is -28.34%.
| Rank | FT | RCS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.80% May 16, 2007 - Mar 9, 2010 | -46.65% Mar 29, 2019 - Jul 5, 2024 |
| #2 | -40.90% Feb 21, 2020 - May 3, 2021 | -35.00% May 5, 2008 - Sep 9, 2009 |
| #3 | -40.83% Apr 15, 2002 - May 16, 2006 | -32.92% Oct 2, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026 |
| #4 | -23.17% Dec 28, 2021 - Jul 31, 2024 | -32.45% Dec 5, 2024 - Sep 23, 2025 |
| #5 | -22.90% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 3, 2001 | -24.63% Mar 31, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004 |
| #6 | -22.53% Mar 24, 2015 - May 26, 2016 | -24.31% Nov 8, 2005 - Mar 26, 2008 |
| #7 | -18.10% Mar 9, 2001 - Nov 28, 2001 | -20.44% Sep 8, 2016 - Apr 25, 2017 |
| #8 | -13.30% May 20, 2013 - Apr 16, 2014 | -18.69% Dec 9, 2014 - Dec 2, 2015 |
| #9 | -12.55% Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011 | -17.57% Sep 20, 2012 - Feb 11, 2013 |
| #10 | -12.20% Sep 26, 2012 - Jan 29, 2013 | -16.05% Jul 14, 2017 - Jul 3, 2018 |
| #11 | -10.78% Dec 6, 2017 - Feb 25, 2019 | -15.13% Feb 20, 2013 - May 20, 2014 |
| #12 | -9.94% Apr 29, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 | -14.85% Feb 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2005 |
| #13 | -9.44% Jul 22, 2016 - Jan 17, 2017 | -14.63% Mar 9, 2010 - Jul 23, 2010 |
| #14 | -8.76% Mar 3, 2025 - Jun 12, 2025 | -14.11% Aug 11, 2010 - Feb 28, 2011 |
| #15 | -7.68% Nov 3, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015 | -13.44% May 20, 2011 - Nov 4, 2011 |
Correlation
Correlation between FT and RCS is 0.94 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FT vs RCS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FT | RCS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.39% | 6.06% |
| 2025 | 6.37% | 8.62% |
| 2024 | 6.98% | 8.03% |
| 2023 | 7.67% | 10.07% |
| 2022 | 8.49% | 12.39% |
| 2021 | 6.00% | 9.01% |
| 2020 | 5.13% | 9.57% |
| 2019 | 4.95% | 8.44% |
| 2018 | 6.05% | 8.93% |
| 2017 | 5.36% | 9.50% |
| 2016 | 6.53% | 10.92% |
| 2015 | 8.28% | 11.17% |
| 2014 | 7.24% | 10.79% |
| 2013 | 6.64% | 11.35% |
| 2012 | 5.92% | 10.97% |
| 2011 | 6.82% | 12.42% |
| 2010 | 7.20% | 13.84% |
| 2009 | 7.86% | 13.00% |
| 2008 | 12.16% | 14.29% |
| 2007 | 6.60% | 8.43% |
| 2006 | 6.58% | 8.07% |
| 2005 | 6.82% | 8.40% |
| 2004 | 5.96% | 8.19% |
| 2003 | 6.79% | 7.31% |
| 2002 | 14.57% | 8.48% |
| 2001 | 9.85% | 8.72% |
| 2000 | 4.50% | 4.41% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks