FT vs PLTM
Comparison between Franklin Universal Trust (FT, ETF) and GraniteShares Platinum Shares (PLTM, ETF).
5-Year PerformancePLTM has outperformed FT, delivering a return of +8.3% compared to +7.0%
FT vs PLTM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
FT
$226M
Winner
PLTM
$227M
Expense Ratio
FT
N/A
PLTM
0.50%
Max Drawdown
FT
65.18%
Winner
PLTM
42.32%
Sharpe Ratio
FT
0.91
Winner
PLTM
1.13
5Y Beta
Winner
FT
0.30
PLTM
0.53
5Y Dividends CAGR
FT
5.84%
PLTM
N/A
FT vs PLTM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
FT
-2.90%
PLTM
-8.64%
3M
Winner
FT
-2.23%
PLTM
-15.67%
6M
FT
+2.31%
Winner
PLTM
+8.15%
1Y
FT
+13.48%
Winner
PLTM
+55.35%
5Y(CAGR)
FT
+7.00%
Winner
PLTM
+8.26%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
FT
+8.43%
PLTM
+6.74%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
FT
+7.25%
PLTM
+6.74%
FT vs PLTM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FT | PLTM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.51% | -16.85% |
| 2025 | +16.44% | +120.69% |
| 2024 | +17.47% | -7.88% |
| 2023 | +4.51% | -9.05% |
| 2022 | -13.44% | +11.87% |
| 2021 | +21.55% | -10.45% |
| 2020 | +1.47% | +8.99% |
| 2019 | +30.84% | +20.79% |
| 2018 | -5.40% | -20.48% |
| 2017 | +13.25% | N/A |
| 2016 | +24.94% | N/A |
| 2015 | -12.94% | N/A |
| 2014 | +10.27% | N/A |
| 2013 | +3.10% | N/A |
| 2012 | +12.59% | N/A |
| 2011 | +13.70% | N/A |
| 2010 | +17.58% | N/A |
| 2009 | +59.78% | N/A |
| 2008 | -40.85% | N/A |
| 2007 | +7.05% | N/A |
| 2006 | +21.52% | N/A |
| 2005 | +10.02% | N/A |
| 2004 | +10.93% | N/A |
| 2003 | +21.38% | N/A |
| 2002 | -29.73% | N/A |
| 2001 | +16.33% | N/A |
| 2000 | +12.12% | N/A |
| 1999 | -14.17% | N/A |
FT vs PLTM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FT was -54.80%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 708 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for PLTM was -42.32%, occurring on Mar 19, 2020. Recovery took 222 trading sessions.
The current FT drawdown is -3.80%. The current PLTM drawdown is -35.90%.
| Rank | FT | PLTM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.80% May 16, 2007 - Mar 9, 2010 | -42.32% Jan 17, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020 |
| #2 | -40.90% Feb 21, 2020 - May 3, 2021 | -35.90% Jan 23, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026 |
| #3 | -40.83% Apr 15, 2002 - May 16, 2006 | -35.82% Feb 19, 2021 - Jun 18, 2025 |
| #4 | -23.17% Dec 28, 2021 - Jul 31, 2024 | -23.80% Feb 16, 2018 - Jan 15, 2020 |
| #5 | -22.90% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 3, 2001 | -15.39% Dec 26, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026 |
| #6 | -22.53% Mar 24, 2015 - May 26, 2016 | -11.92% Oct 16, 2025 - Dec 12, 2025 |
| #7 | -18.10% Mar 9, 2001 - Nov 28, 2001 | -11.62% Jul 17, 2025 - Sep 23, 2025 |
| #8 | -13.30% May 20, 2013 - Apr 16, 2014 | -7.93% Jan 7, 2021 - Jan 21, 2021 |
| #9 | -12.55% Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011 | -7.15% Jan 6, 2026 - Jan 20, 2026 |
| #10 | -12.20% Sep 26, 2012 - Jan 29, 2013 | -5.89% Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 8, 2021 |
| #11 | -10.78% Dec 6, 2017 - Feb 25, 2019 | -5.79% Dec 4, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020 |
| #12 | -9.94% Apr 29, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 | -5.58% Jul 2, 2025 - Jul 17, 2025 |
| #13 | -9.44% Jul 22, 2016 - Jan 17, 2017 | -5.38% Jun 26, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025 |
| #14 | -8.76% Mar 3, 2025 - Jun 12, 2025 | -4.31% Jun 18, 2025 - Jun 25, 2025 |
| #15 | -7.68% Nov 3, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015 | -4.10% Oct 8, 2025 - Oct 16, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between FT and PLTM is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.74
-101
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: FT vs SPYPLTM vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks