FRAF vs CLLS

Comparison between Franklin Financial Services Corp (FRAF, Company) and Cellectis (CLLS, Company).

FRAF is from the Financial Services sector, while CLLS is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceFRAF has outperformed CLLS, delivering a return of +17.7% compared to -26.1%

FRAF vs CLLS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	FRAF(COMPANY)	CLLS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$288M	$288M
Max Drawdown	65.11%	97.96%
Sharpe Ratio	1.52	0.36
5Y Beta	0.40	0.90
Industry	Banks - Regional	Biotechnology
P/E Ratio	11.99	-4.27
Forward P/E	12.00	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.12	-0.73
Dividend Yield	2.08%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	13.02%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	8.04%	-24.18%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	181.25%
Free Cash Flow Yield	14.14%	-13.96%
P/S Ratio	3.10	3.83
P/B Ratio	1.56	4.77

Market Cap

Winner

FRAF

$288M

CLLS

$288M

Max Drawdown

Winner

FRAF

65.11%

CLLS

97.96%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

FRAF

1.52

CLLS

0.36

5Y Beta

Winner

FRAF

0.40

CLLS

0.90

Industry

FRAF

Banks - Regional

CLLS

Biotechnology

P/E Ratio

FRAF

11.99

Winner

CLLS

-4.27

Forward P/E

FRAF

12.00

CLLS

N/A

PEG Ratio

FRAF

0.12

Winner

CLLS

-0.73

Dividend Yield

FRAF

2.08%

CLLS

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

FRAF

13.02%

CLLS

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

FRAF

8.04%

CLLS

-24.18%

Debt to Equity

Winner

FRAF

0.00%

CLLS

181.25%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

FRAF

14.14%

CLLS

-13.96%

P/S Ratio

Winner

FRAF

3.10

CLLS

3.83

P/B Ratio

Winner

FRAF

1.56

CLLS

4.77

FRAF vs CLLS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	FRAF	CLLS
1 month	+0.81%	-5.00%
3 months	+12.66%	-26.92%
6 months	+25.31%	-24.80%
1 year	+60.41%	+6.74%
5 years(CAGR)	+17.67%	-26.13%
10 years(CAGR)	+14.25%	-19.95%
Max(CAGR)	+9.92%	-20.64%

Winner

FRAF

+0.81%

CLLS

-5.00%

Winner

FRAF

+12.66%

CLLS

-26.92%

Winner

FRAF

+25.31%

CLLS

-24.80%

Winner

FRAF

+60.41%

CLLS

+6.74%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

FRAF

+17.67%

CLLS

-26.13%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

FRAF

+14.25%

CLLS

-19.95%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

FRAF

+9.92%

CLLS

-20.64%

FRAF vs CLLS - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	FRAF	CLLS
2026	+30.64%	-40.62%
2025	+77.35%	+167.40%
2024	+0.02%	-41.37%
2023	-7.68%	+35.68%
2022	+13.44%	-76.05%
2021	+27.59%	-70.58%
2020	-27.07%	+51.94%
2019	+28.84%	-0.29%
2018	-14.55%	-44.67%
2017	+33.45%	+60.87%
2016	+26.83%	-43.80%
2015	+10.47%	-21.04%
2014	+34.09%	N/A
2013	+27.44%	N/A
2012	+19.77%	N/A
2011	-30.75%	N/A
2010	+14.35%	N/A
2009	-8.41%	N/A
2008	-23.49%	N/A
2007	-5.13%	N/A
2006	+14.36%	N/A
2005	-3.86%	N/A
2004	-19.00%	N/A
2003	+32.26%	N/A
2002	+14.28%	N/A
2001	+64.00%	N/A

FRAF vs CLLS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FRAF was -51.26%, occurring on Mar 4, 2009. Recovery took 2633 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLLS was -97.96%, occurring on Oct 31, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current FRAF drawdown is -1.51%. The current CLLS drawdown is -94.02%.

Rank	FRAF	CLLS
#1	-51.26% May 19, 2004 - Nov 12, 2014	-97.96% May 28, 2015 - Oct 31, 2023
#2	-44.30% Dec 20, 2019 - Dec 29, 2022	-22.01% Mar 25, 2015 - May 27, 2015
#3	-30.98% Dec 30, 2022 - Nov 8, 2023	N/A
#4	-25.51% Nov 8, 2023 - Nov 6, 2024	N/A
#5	-20.56% Nov 15, 2017 - Feb 4, 2019	N/A
#6	-19.70% Jul 8, 2019 - Dec 20, 2019	N/A
#7	-18.53% Apr 30, 2015 - Sep 2, 2016	N/A
#8	-17.17% Dec 10, 2024 - Jan 30, 2025	N/A
#9	-16.28% Dec 18, 2025 - Apr 9, 2026	N/A
#10	-13.51% Apr 23, 2025 - Jul 18, 2025	N/A
#11	-12.17% Feb 19, 2025 - Apr 21, 2025	N/A
#12	-10.63% Sep 19, 2025 - Nov 11, 2025	N/A
#13	-9.87% Nov 24, 2014 - Mar 10, 2015	N/A
#14	-8.57% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 12, 2025	N/A
#15	-8.53% May 31, 2002 - Mar 20, 2003	N/A

Correlation

Correlation between FRAF and CLLS is -0.58 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.58

-101