FPA vs NIM
Comparison between FIRST TRUST ASIA PACIFIC EX-JAPAN ALPHADEX FUND (FPA, ETF) and Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFPA has outperformed NIM, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to +0.5%
FPA vs NIM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FPA vs NIM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FPA vs NIM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FPA | NIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +26.21% | +3.27% |
| 2025 | +41.95% | +10.61% |
| 2024 | +5.55% | +2.15% |
| 2023 | +13.27% | +0.18% |
| 2022 | -14.58% | -12.38% |
| 2021 | +1.29% | +3.96% |
| 2020 | +13.32% | +4.94% |
| 2019 | +8.59% | +12.36% |
| 2018 | -22.54% | -0.58% |
| 2017 | +33.88% | +4.57% |
| 2016 | +2.79% | -1.60% |
| 2015 | +0.37% | -0.11% |
| 2014 | +5.58% | +14.08% |
| 2013 | +3.11% | -6.81% |
| 2012 | +24.72% | +0.95% |
| 2011 | -24.40% | +12.38% |
| 2010 | N/A | -0.53% |
| 2009 | N/A | +13.76% |
| 2008 | N/A | +6.10% |
| 2007 | N/A | -1.79% |
| 2006 | N/A | +8.94% |
| 2005 | N/A | +7.36% |
| 2004 | N/A | +3.05% |
| 2003 | N/A | +2.41% |
| 2002 | N/A | -1.91% |
| 2001 | N/A | +4.88% |
| 2000 | N/A | +10.49% |
| 1999 | N/A | -8.48% |
FPA vs NIM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FPA was -52.90%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 808 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NIM was -19.96%, occurring on Oct 3, 2023. Recovery took 1054 trading sessions.
The current FPA drawdown is -18.64%. The current NIM drawdown is -3.73%.
| Rank | FPA | NIM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -52.90% Jan 26, 2018 - Apr 14, 2021 | -19.96% Nov 18, 2021 - Feb 3, 2026 |
| #2 | -37.78% Jul 26, 2011 - May 14, 2014 | -16.23% Feb 5, 2020 - Aug 13, 2020 |
| #3 | -35.36% Jun 2, 2021 - May 23, 2025 | -16.21% Dec 3, 2012 - Sep 18, 2014 |
| #4 | -24.59% Apr 28, 2015 - May 22, 2017 | -15.01% Jun 4, 2008 - Jan 9, 2009 |
| #5 | -21.26% Jun 1, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026 | -14.42% Nov 3, 2010 - Nov 7, 2011 |
| #6 | -15.34% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026 | -14.17% Nov 9, 2001 - Feb 22, 2005 |
| #7 | -13.25% Aug 26, 2014 - Apr 6, 2015 | -12.13% Aug 1, 2016 - Apr 10, 2019 |
| #8 | -7.08% May 14, 2026 - May 26, 2026 | -9.68% Nov 1, 1999 - Mar 30, 2000 |
| #9 | -6.98% Apr 26, 2011 - Jul 7, 2011 | -8.81% Mar 2, 2012 - Sep 12, 2012 |
| #10 | -6.39% Nov 3, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026 | -8.60% Jan 29, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 |
| #11 | -4.74% Sep 16, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 | -7.95% Oct 3, 2005 - Jun 1, 2006 |
| #12 | -4.40% Jul 26, 2017 - Sep 12, 2017 | -7.22% Feb 28, 2007 - Jan 14, 2008 |
| #13 | -4.40% May 6, 2026 - May 14, 2026 | -6.67% Mar 16, 2026 - May 19, 2026 |
| #14 | -4.08% Sep 18, 2017 - Oct 12, 2017 | -6.42% Jun 2, 2000 - Dec 19, 2000 |
| #15 | -3.80% May 7, 2021 - Jun 2, 2021 | -6.42% Aug 13, 2001 - Oct 31, 2001 |
Correlation
Correlation between FPA and NIM is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FPA vs NIM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FPA | NIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.20% | 2.16% |
| 2025 | 4.71% | 3.61% |
| 2024 | 3.40% | 4.10% |
| 2023 | 3.02% | 3.49% |
| 2022 | 4.22% | 2.88% |
| 2021 | 5.12% | 2.69% |
| 2020 | 1.59% | 3.42% |
| 2019 | 3.90% | 3.03% |
| 2018 | 2.81% | 3.27% |
| 2017 | 3.15% | 3.15% |
| 2016 | 2.42% | 3.23% |
| 2015 | 1.74% | 3.27% |
| 2014 | 4.11% | 3.21% |
| 2013 | 2.35% | 3.60% |
| 2012 | 1.59% | 3.67% |
| 2011 | 2.17% | 3.86% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 4.21% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 4.08% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 4.65% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 4.76% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 4.78% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 4.95% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 5.10% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 5.39% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 5.57% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 6.25% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.50% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks