FNDC vs CSQ

Comparison between SCHWAB FUNDAMENTAL INTERNATIONAL SMALL EQUITY ETF (FNDC, ETF) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCSQ has outperformed FNDC, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to +8.0%

FNDC vs CSQ - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	FNDC(ETF)	CSQ(ETF)
Net Assets	$3B	$3.10B
Expense Ratio	0.39%	N/A
Max Drawdown	46.18%	72.74%
Sharpe Ratio	2.05	1.81
5Y Beta	0.64	1.02
5Y Dividends CAGR	14.67%	2.82%

Net Assets

FNDC

$3B

Winner

CSQ

$3.10B

Expense Ratio

FNDC

0.39%

CSQ

N/A

Max Drawdown

Winner

FNDC

46.18%

CSQ

72.74%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

FNDC

2.05

CSQ

1.81

5Y Beta

Winner

FNDC

0.64

CSQ

1.02

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

FNDC

14.67%

CSQ

2.82%

FNDC vs CSQ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	FNDC	CSQ
1 month	+3.41%	+12.95%
3 months	+2.80%	+7.23%
6 months	+19.04%	+12.35%
1 year	+36.87%	+32.35%
5 years(CAGR)	+8.01%	+10.74%
10 years(CAGR)	+9.29%	+16.60%
Max(CAGR)	+8.21%	+10.13%

FNDC

+3.41%

Winner

CSQ

+12.95%

FNDC

+2.80%

Winner

CSQ

+7.23%

Winner

FNDC

+19.04%

CSQ

+12.35%

Winner

FNDC

+36.87%

CSQ

+32.35%

5Y(CAGR)

FNDC

+8.01%

Winner

CSQ

+10.74%

10Y(CAGR)

FNDC

+9.29%

Winner

CSQ

+16.60%

Max(CAGR)

FNDC

+8.21%

Winner

CSQ

+10.13%

FNDC vs CSQ - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	FNDC	CSQ
2026	+12.73%	+8.07%
2025	+36.15%	+17.22%
2024	+2.80%	+29.40%
2023	+15.02%	+22.44%
2022	-15.14%	-24.06%
2021	+10.17%	+34.84%
2020	+5.92%	+25.88%
2019	+20.39%	+38.06%
2018	-19.82%	-4.03%
2017	+28.25%	+25.28%
2016	+10.64%	+16.51%
2015	+5.26%	-4.73%
2014	-3.46%	+14.95%
2013	+11.10%	+18.27%
2012	N/A	+26.53%
2011	N/A	-4.16%
2010	N/A	+12.12%
2009	N/A	+48.27%
2008	N/A	-48.59%
2007	N/A	-2.22%
2006	N/A	+23.71%
2005	N/A	+3.84%
2004	N/A	-3.64%

FNDC vs CSQ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FNDC was -43.24%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 741 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CSQ was -67.02%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1214 trading sessions.

Rank	FNDC	CSQ
#1	-43.24% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021	-67.02% May 22, 2007 - Mar 15, 2012
#2	-32.13% Sep 3, 2021 - Sep 19, 2024	-48.11% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 12, 2020
#3	-18.64% May 15, 2015 - Aug 11, 2016	-33.06% Dec 30, 2021 - Mar 20, 2024
#4	-14.60% Jul 3, 2014 - May 14, 2015	-29.03% Sep 24, 2018 - Apr 29, 2019
#5	-12.00% Sep 26, 2024 - Apr 24, 2025	-24.60% May 18, 2015 - Jul 15, 2016
#6	-11.20% Feb 27, 2026 - May 6, 2026	-24.18% Jan 23, 2025 - Jun 26, 2025
#7	-6.80% Jun 7, 2021 - Sep 3, 2021	-17.11% Apr 1, 2004 - Jul 8, 2005
#8	-6.05% Jan 21, 2014 - Feb 24, 2014	-15.25% Jan 12, 2026 - Apr 20, 2026
#9	-5.00% Sep 15, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025	-14.59% Aug 27, 2014 - Nov 14, 2014
#10	-4.75% Sep 22, 2016 - Jan 4, 2017	-12.20% Oct 17, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013
#11	-3.98% Mar 6, 2014 - Apr 2, 2014	-10.85% Jan 26, 2018 - Jun 1, 2018
#12	-3.95% Jan 8, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021	-9.91% Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 10, 2020
#13	-3.85% Aug 23, 2013 - Sep 9, 2013	-9.90% May 17, 2013 - Oct 25, 2013
#14	-3.75% May 7, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021	-9.75% Jul 10, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024
#15	-3.37% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 8, 2025	-9.53% Apr 15, 2021 - Jun 29, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between FNDC and CSQ is 0.94 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.94

-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

FNDC vs CSQ dividend yield comparison.

Year	FNDC	CSQ
2026	0.00%	1.81%
2025	3.86%	6.51%
2024	3.59%	6.95%
2023	2.86%	8.27%
2022	1.98%	9.17%
2021	2.58%	6.38%
2020	1.77%	7.03%
2019	2.71%	7.14%
2018	2.68%	9.35%
2017	1.94%	8.20%
2016	1.95%	9.64%
2015	1.30%	10.00%
2014	1.61%	8.44%
2013	0.64%	7.71%
2012	0.00%	8.56%
2011	0.00%	7.54%
2010	0.00%	6.80%
2009	0.00%	8.93%
2008	0.00%	18.36%
2007	0.00%	8.71%
2006	0.00%	7.48%
2005	0.00%	7.66%
2004	0.00%	4.28%