FMS vs ARMK
Comparison between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company) and Aramark (ARMK, Company).
FMS is from the Healthcare sector, while ARMK is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceARMK has outperformed FMS, delivering a return of +19.2% compared to -7.1%
FMS vs ARMK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FMS vs ARMK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FMS vs ARMK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FMS | ARMK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +8.23% | +56.68% |
| 2025 | +10.46% | +0.81% |
| 2024 | +9.62% | +35.04% |
| 2023 | +32.75% | -4.85% |
| 2022 | -48.69% | +12.60% |
| 2021 | -22.15% | -1.09% |
| 2020 | +14.17% | -10.29% |
| 2019 | +14.97% | +49.41% |
| 2018 | -37.35% | -32.33% |
| 2017 | +25.11% | +24.66% |
| 2016 | +3.00% | +11.66% |
| 2015 | +15.27% | +5.87% |
| 2014 | +7.92% | +24.17% |
| 2013 | +4.68% | +15.51% |
| 2012 | -1.60% | N/A |
| 2011 | +19.12% | N/A |
| 2010 | +6.92% | N/A |
| 2009 | +12.89% | N/A |
| 2008 | -9.60% | N/A |
| 2007 | +17.56% | N/A |
| 2006 | +24.19% | N/A |
| 2005 | +32.87% | N/A |
| 2004 | +13.43% | N/A |
| 2003 | +75.69% | N/A |
| 2002 | -32.86% | N/A |
| 2001 | -28.05% | N/A |
| 2000 | -1.41% | N/A |
| 1999 | +20.10% | N/A |
FMS vs ARMK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ARMK was -72.27%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 751 trading sessions.
The current FMS drawdown is -47.46%. The current ARMK drawdown is -1.96%.
| Rank | FMS | ARMK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 | -72.27% Jan 22, 2020 - Jan 13, 2023 |
| #2 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 | -39.55% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 19, 2019 |
| #3 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 | -27.63% Nov 26, 2024 - Jun 26, 2025 |
| #4 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 | -26.25% Jan 17, 2023 - Mar 12, 2024 |
| #5 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 | -18.15% Jul 23, 2025 - Apr 14, 2026 |
| #6 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 | -14.85% Mar 21, 2014 - Nov 28, 2014 |
| #7 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 | -13.97% Aug 19, 2015 - Dec 2, 2015 |
| #8 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 | -13.24% Sep 7, 2016 - Jun 1, 2017 |
| #9 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 | -12.37% Dec 4, 2015 - Apr 18, 2016 |
| #10 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 | -9.84% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 10, 2014 |
| #11 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 | -8.96% Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 10, 2018 |
| #12 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 | -7.60% May 10, 2016 - Jul 8, 2016 |
| #13 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 | -7.51% May 14, 2024 - Jun 10, 2024 |
| #14 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 | -7.37% Mar 10, 2014 - Mar 21, 2014 |
| #15 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 | -6.94% Nov 28, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between FMS and ARMK is -0.37 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FMS vs ARMK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FMS | ARMK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.56% | 0.42% |
| 2025 | 3.30% | 1.18% |
| 2024 | 2.80% | 1.05% |
| 2023 | 2.97% | 1.19% |
| 2022 | 4.34% | 1.06% |
| 2021 | 2.57% | 1.19% |
| 2020 | 1.72% | 1.14% |
| 2019 | 1.78% | 1.01% |
| 2018 | 1.95% | 1.47% |
| 2017 | 0.70% | 0.97% |
| 2016 | 0.74% | 1.09% |
| 2015 | 0.71% | 1.10% |
| 2014 | 0.99% | 1.00% |
| 2013 | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.96% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.93% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.93% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.81% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks