FMS vs APA
Comparison between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company) and APA Corporation (APA, Company).
FMS is from the Healthcare sector, while APA is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceAPA has outperformed FMS, delivering a return of +15.9% compared to -9.6%
FMS vs APA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FMS vs APA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FMS vs APA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FMS | APA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -8.12% | +56.23% |
| 2025 | +10.46% | +10.03% |
| 2024 | +9.62% | -33.86% |
| 2023 | +32.75% | -15.69% |
| 2022 | -48.69% | +69.16% |
| 2021 | -22.15% | +83.27% |
| 2020 | +14.17% | -43.19% |
| 2019 | +14.97% | -2.15% |
| 2018 | -37.35% | -39.37% |
| 2017 | +25.11% | -32.46% |
| 2016 | +3.00% | +45.77% |
| 2015 | +15.27% | -29.05% |
| 2014 | +7.92% | -25.85% |
| 2013 | +4.68% | +7.46% |
| 2012 | -1.60% | -17.57% |
| 2011 | +19.12% | -24.76% |
| 2010 | +6.92% | +13.29% |
| 2009 | +12.89% | +31.19% |
| 2008 | -9.60% | -31.98% |
| 2007 | +17.56% | +67.86% |
| 2006 | +24.19% | -5.58% |
| 2005 | +32.87% | +42.74% |
| 2004 | +13.43% | +26.50% |
| 2003 | +75.69% | +44.90% |
| 2002 | -32.86% | +16.13% |
| 2001 | -28.05% | -20.99% |
| 2000 | -1.41% | +106.07% |
| 1999 | +20.10% | -7.36% |
FMS vs APA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for APA was -96.74%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current FMS drawdown is -55.40%. The current APA drawdown is -63.02%.
| Rank | FMS | APA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 | -96.74% May 20, 2008 - Apr 1, 2020 |
| #2 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 | -47.06% Dec 28, 2000 - Feb 21, 2003 |
| #3 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 | -28.54% Nov 17, 1999 - Mar 28, 2000 |
| #4 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 | -25.60% Sep 21, 2005 - Apr 25, 2007 |
| #5 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 | -21.84% May 18, 2000 - Aug 17, 2000 |
| #6 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 | -21.08% Sep 6, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000 |
| #7 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 | -19.51% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 17, 2005 |
| #8 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 | -17.29% Jan 3, 2008 - Feb 20, 2008 |
| #9 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 | -17.19% Jul 19, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007 |
| #10 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 | -14.20% Apr 16, 2004 - Jul 7, 2004 |
| #11 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 | -12.59% Jan 23, 2004 - Mar 17, 2004 |
| #12 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 | -11.71% Nov 30, 2004 - Jan 27, 2005 |
| #13 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 | -11.30% Apr 18, 2008 - May 16, 2008 |
| #14 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 | -10.51% Oct 26, 2004 - Nov 30, 2004 |
| #15 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 | -10.36% Mar 10, 2003 - May 22, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between FMS and APA is 0.15 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FMS vs APA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FMS | APA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.28% |
| 2025 | 3.30% | 4.09% |
| 2024 | 2.80% | 4.33% |
| 2023 | 2.97% | 2.79% |
| 2022 | 4.34% | 1.34% |
| 2021 | 2.57% | 0.51% |
| 2020 | 1.72% | 2.29% |
| 2019 | 1.78% | 3.91% |
| 2018 | 1.95% | 3.81% |
| 2017 | 0.70% | 2.37% |
| 2016 | 0.74% | 1.58% |
| 2015 | 0.71% | 2.25% |
| 2014 | 0.99% | 1.52% |
| 2013 | 0.94% | 0.90% |
| 2012 | 0.91% | 0.84% |
| 2011 | 0.96% | 0.66% |
| 2010 | 0.93% | 0.50% |
| 2009 | 1.06% | 0.58% |
| 2008 | 1.38% | 0.94% |
| 2007 | 0.91% | 0.56% |
| 2006 | 0.93% | 0.68% |
| 2005 | 1.06% | 0.50% |
| 2004 | 1.22% | 0.51% |
| 2003 | 1.24% | 0.51% |
| 2002 | 1.49% | 0.70% |
| 2001 | 0.81% | 0.79% |
| 2000 | 0.58% | 0.29% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks