FLS vs HBM
Comparison between Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company) and Hudbay Minerals Inc (HBM, Company).
FLS is from the Industrials sector, while HBM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceHBM has outperformed FLS, delivering a return of +26.4% compared to +13.2%
FLS vs HBM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FLS vs HBM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FLS vs HBM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FLS | HBM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.40% | +3.62% |
| 2025 | +22.83% | +133.63% |
| 2024 | +44.37% | +48.66% |
| 2023 | +35.29% | +8.81% |
| 2022 | +1.67% | -28.48% |
| 2021 | -10.02% | -1.52% |
| 2020 | -25.24% | +70.87% |
| 2019 | +33.08% | -13.25% |
| 2018 | -9.01% | -48.53% |
| 2017 | -12.92% | +47.04% |
| 2016 | +16.21% | +46.50% |
| 2015 | -28.37% | -56.93% |
| 2014 | -19.84% | +6.88% |
| 2013 | +58.24% | -22.57% |
| 2012 | +45.71% | -0.96% |
| 2011 | -16.36% | -44.04% |
| 2010 | +24.27% | +37.87% |
| 2009 | +74.34% | +211.30% |
| 2008 | -44.96% | N/A |
| 2007 | +89.63% | N/A |
| 2006 | +23.37% | N/A |
| 2005 | +47.28% | N/A |
| 2004 | +32.28% | N/A |
| 2003 | +36.92% | N/A |
| 2002 | -44.00% | N/A |
| 2001 | +28.99% | N/A |
| 2000 | +30.05% | N/A |
| 1999 | -1.38% | N/A |
FLS vs HBM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for HBM was -92.21%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 3731 trading sessions.
The current FLS drawdown is -24.20%. The current HBM drawdown is -34.67%.
| Rank | FLS | HBM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -77.36% May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005 | -92.21% Dec 10, 2010 - Oct 13, 2025 |
| #2 | -73.54% Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025 | -40.97% Nov 9, 2009 - Oct 15, 2010 |
| #3 | -73.10% Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012 | -36.16% Feb 27, 2026 - May 29, 2026 |
| #4 | -41.25% May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002 | -35.38% Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 8, 2026 |
| #5 | -40.31% Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000 | -31.59% Jun 11, 2009 - Aug 5, 2009 |
| #6 | -29.83% Feb 25, 2026 - May 19, 2026 | -20.13% Oct 14, 2009 - Nov 5, 2009 |
| #7 | -21.25% May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007 | -19.50% May 4, 2009 - Jun 11, 2009 |
| #8 | -20.62% Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008 | -17.02% Oct 13, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025 |
| #9 | -17.19% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 | -13.22% Jan 28, 2026 - Feb 24, 2026 |
| #10 | -17.08% Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008 | -12.80% Feb 26, 2009 - Mar 24, 2009 |
| #11 | -16.74% Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001 | -11.92% Mar 27, 2009 - Apr 2, 2009 |
| #12 | -15.47% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 | -9.02% Apr 13, 2009 - Apr 24, 2009 |
| #13 | -15.35% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 | -7.91% Feb 18, 2009 - Feb 24, 2009 |
| #14 | -13.80% Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000 | -7.32% Aug 13, 2009 - Sep 9, 2009 |
| #15 | -11.57% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 | -6.98% Sep 30, 2009 - Oct 6, 2009 |
Correlation
Correlation between FLS and HBM is 0.46 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FLS vs HBM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FLS | HBM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.63% | 0.07% |
| 2025 | 1.21% | 0.07% |
| 2024 | 1.46% | 0.17% |
| 2023 | 1.94% | 0.31% |
| 2022 | 2.61% | 0.32% |
| 2021 | 2.61% | 0.22% |
| 2020 | 2.17% | 0.21% |
| 2019 | 1.91% | 0.36% |
| 2018 | 2.00% | 0.38% |
| 2017 | 1.35% | 0.23% |
| 2016 | 1.58% | 0.35% |
| 2015 | 1.71% | 0.52% |
| 2014 | 4.41% | 0.23% |
| 2013 | 1.24% | 1.34% |
| 2012 | 0.98% | 1.99% |
| 2011 | 1.29% | 2.01% |
| 2010 | 0.97% | 0.55% |
| 2009 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.94% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.62% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.82% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks