FLS vs AM
Comparison between Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company) and Antero Midstream Corp (AM, Company).
FLS is from the Industrials sector, while AM is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceAM has outperformed FLS, delivering a return of +26.6% compared to +17.0%
FLS vs AM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FLS vs AM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FLS vs AM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FLS | AM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +13.69% | +22.38% |
| 2025 | +22.83% | +21.21% |
| 2024 | +44.37% | +27.60% |
| 2023 | +35.29% | +28.56% |
| 2022 | +1.67% | +19.43% |
| 2021 | -10.02% | +41.21% |
| 2020 | -25.24% | +36.44% |
| 2019 | +33.08% | -61.16% |
| 2018 | -9.01% | -22.67% |
| 2017 | -12.92% | -1.33% |
| 2016 | +16.21% | +46.37% |
| 2015 | -28.37% | -14.37% |
| 2014 | -19.84% | -1.89% |
| 2013 | +58.24% | N/A |
| 2012 | +45.71% | N/A |
| 2011 | -16.36% | N/A |
| 2010 | +24.27% | N/A |
| 2009 | +74.34% | N/A |
| 2008 | -44.96% | N/A |
| 2007 | +89.63% | N/A |
| 2006 | +23.37% | N/A |
| 2005 | +47.28% | N/A |
| 2004 | +32.28% | N/A |
| 2003 | +36.92% | N/A |
| 2002 | -44.00% | N/A |
| 2001 | +28.99% | N/A |
| 2000 | +30.05% | N/A |
| 1999 | -1.38% | N/A |
FLS vs AM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for AM was -92.96%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1594 trading sessions.
The current FLS drawdown is -12.61%. The current AM drawdown is -8.08%.
| Rank | FLS | AM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -77.36% May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005 | -92.96% Oct 10, 2018 - Feb 13, 2025 |
| #2 | -73.54% Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025 | -41.86% Jun 18, 2015 - Oct 14, 2016 |
| #3 | -73.10% Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012 | -28.89% Aug 2, 2017 - Aug 2, 2018 |
| #4 | -41.25% May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002 | -28.31% Nov 12, 2014 - Jun 2, 2015 |
| #5 | -40.31% Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000 | -16.23% Aug 2, 2018 - Oct 9, 2018 |
| #6 | -29.83% Feb 25, 2026 - May 19, 2026 | -15.30% Feb 10, 2017 - Aug 2, 2017 |
| #7 | -21.25% May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007 | -13.98% Apr 2, 2025 - May 13, 2025 |
| #8 | -20.62% Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008 | -12.67% Mar 25, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026 |
| #9 | -17.19% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 | -11.32% Sep 26, 2025 - Feb 6, 2026 |
| #10 | -17.08% Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008 | -10.21% Oct 27, 2016 - Dec 22, 2016 |
| #11 | -16.74% Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001 | -9.98% Jun 2, 2025 - Sep 22, 2025 |
| #12 | -15.47% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 | -6.05% Oct 21, 2016 - Oct 27, 2016 |
| #13 | -15.35% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 | -5.53% Feb 13, 2025 - Feb 28, 2025 |
| #14 | -13.80% Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000 | -4.06% Mar 5, 2025 - Mar 14, 2025 |
| #15 | -11.57% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 | -3.39% Jun 3, 2015 - Jun 12, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between FLS and AM is 0.77 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FLS vs AM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FLS | AM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.55% | 3.18% |
| 2025 | 1.21% | 5.06% |
| 2024 | 1.46% | 5.96% |
| 2023 | 1.94% | 7.18% |
| 2022 | 2.61% | 8.34% |
| 2021 | 2.61% | 10.15% |
| 2020 | 2.17% | 15.95% |
| 2019 | 1.91% | 18.28% |
| 2018 | 2.00% | 7.53% |
| 2017 | 1.35% | 4.27% |
| 2016 | 1.58% | 3.14% |
| 2015 | 1.71% | 2.93% |
| 2014 | 4.41% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.98% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.29% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.97% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.94% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.62% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.82% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks