StockComparison Logo
vs

FLS vs ACM

Comparison between Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company) and AECOM (ACM, Company).

Both FLS and ACM are from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceFLS has outperformed ACM, delivering a return of +13.2% compared to +4.0%

FLS vs ACM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
FLS
$8.78B
Winner
ACM
$8.81B
Max Drawdown
FLS
77.36%
Winner
ACM
59.97%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
FLS
0.74
ACM
-1.37
5Y Beta
FLS
1.55
Winner
ACM
0.82
Industry
FLS
Specialty Industrial Machinery
ACM
Engineering & Construction
P/E Ratio
FLS
19.61
Winner
ACM
17.69
Forward P/E
FLS
16.84
Winner
ACM
10.21
PEG Ratio
Winner
FLS
0.23
ACM
0.69
Dividend Yield
FLS
1.23%
Winner
ACM
1.66%
5Y Dividends CAGR
FLS
5.99%
ACM
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
FLS
24.01%
ACM
N/A
Debt to Equity
FLS
77.52%
Winner
ACM
2.77%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
FLS
5.84%
ACM
4.66%
P/S Ratio
FLS
1.91
Winner
ACM
0.56
P/B Ratio
FLS
3.95
Winner
ACM
3.90

FLS vs ACM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
FLS
-13.61%
Winner
ACM
-1.13%
3M
Winner
FLS
-10.64%
ACM
-17.94%
6M
Winner
FLS
-9.60%
ACM
-28.18%
1Y
Winner
FLS
+30.58%
ACM
-37.37%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
FLS
+13.25%
ACM
+4.01%
10Y(CAGR)
FLS
+5.68%
Winner
ACM
+7.88%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
FLS
+11.18%
ACM
+6.71%

FLS vs ACM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFLSACM
2026-1.40%-26.61%
2025+22.83%-9.69%
2024+44.37%+17.75%
2023+35.29%+11.14%
2022+1.67%+10.72%
2021-10.02%+58.12%
2020-25.24%+15.82%
2019+33.08%+60.45%
2018-9.01%-29.75%
2017-12.92%+0.41%
2016+16.21%+21.77%
2015-28.37%-1.05%
2014-19.84%+3.94%
2013+58.24%+19.10%
2012+45.71%+14.42%
2011-16.36%-27.37%
2010+24.27%-0.64%
2009+74.34%-14.97%
2008-44.96%+11.79%
2007+89.63%+35.40%
2006+23.37%N/A
2005+47.28%N/A
2004+32.28%N/A
2003+36.92%N/A
2002-44.00%N/A
2001+28.99%N/A
2000+30.05%N/A
1999-1.38%N/A

FLS vs ACM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ACM was -59.97%, occurring on Jun 25, 2012. Recovery took 1732 trading sessions.

The current FLS drawdown is -24.20%. The current ACM drawdown is -47.34%.

RankFLSACM
#1-77.36%
May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005
-59.97%
Oct 2, 2007 - Aug 19, 2014
#2-73.54%
Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025
-54.12%
Feb 21, 2020 - Nov 24, 2020
#3-73.10%
Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012
-49.67%
Oct 31, 2025 - Jul 1, 2026
#4-41.25%
May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002
-39.29%
Aug 26, 2014 - Dec 6, 2016
#5-40.31%
Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000
-37.90%
Dec 8, 2016 - Oct 16, 2019
#6-29.83%
Feb 25, 2026 - May 19, 2026
-25.07%
Nov 29, 2024 - Aug 5, 2025
#7-21.25%
May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007
-22.85%
Mar 25, 2022 - Nov 15, 2022
#8-20.62%
Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008
-17.35%
Feb 14, 2023 - Dec 4, 2023
#9-17.19%
Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007
-15.88%
Mar 21, 2024 - Aug 23, 2024
#10-17.08%
Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008
-14.87%
May 7, 2021 - Oct 25, 2021
#11-16.74%
Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001
-14.29%
Jan 4, 2022 - Mar 18, 2022
#12-15.47%
Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008
-13.38%
Jul 13, 2007 - Sep 17, 2007
#13-15.35%
Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000
-10.93%
Dec 2, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021
#14-13.80%
Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000
-9.96%
Nov 24, 2021 - Dec 23, 2021
#15-11.57%
Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014
-8.88%
Jan 7, 2021 - Feb 8, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between FLS and ACM is 0.48 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.48
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

FLS vs ACM dividend yield comparison.

YearFLSACM
20260.63%1.33%
20251.21%1.09%
20241.46%0.82%
20231.94%0.78%
20222.61%0.71%
20212.61%0.00%
20202.17%0.00%
20191.91%0.00%
20182.00%0.00%
20171.35%0.00%
20161.58%0.00%
20151.71%0.00%
20144.41%0.00%
20131.24%0.00%
20120.98%0.00%
20111.29%0.00%
20100.97%0.00%
20091.14%0.00%
20081.94%0.00%
20070.62%0.00%
19990.82%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare