FLG vs MAC
Comparison between New York Community Bancorp Inc (FLG, Company) and Macerich Company (MAC, Company).
FLG is from the Financial Services sector, while MAC is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceMAC has outperformed FLG, delivering a return of +13.6% compared to -14.9%
FLG vs MAC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FLG vs MAC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FLG vs MAC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FLG | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.78% | +19.56% |
| 2025 | +36.70% | -5.20% |
| 2024 | -69.65% | +33.42% |
| 2023 | +26.16% | +46.90% |
| 2022 | -25.85% | -32.38% |
| 2021 | +23.21% | +68.64% |
| 2020 | -4.60% | -55.04% |
| 2019 | +33.32% | -31.47% |
| 2018 | -23.52% | -31.52% |
| 2017 | -13.94% | -3.05% |
| 2016 | +4.65% | -7.54% |
| 2015 | +8.63% | +1.57% |
| 2014 | +2.66% | +48.48% |
| 2013 | +34.66% | +4.11% |
| 2012 | +12.20% | +18.93% |
| 2011 | -30.27% | +9.66% |
| 2010 | +38.83% | +43.61% |
| 2009 | +30.55% | +125.69% |
| 2008 | -26.64% | -72.27% |
| 2007 | +15.05% | -15.53% |
| 2006 | +2.79% | +30.43% |
| 2005 | -14.29% | +12.64% |
| 2004 | -23.55% | +51.46% |
| 2003 | +77.44% | +54.68% |
| 2002 | +28.53% | +24.65% |
| 2001 | +45.88% | +55.36% |
| 2000 | +42.77% | +4.10% |
| 1999 | -13.74% | +4.40% |
FLG vs MAC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FLG was -80.10%, occurring on Apr 30, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for MAC was -93.28%, occurring on Mar 27, 2009. Recovery took 1566 trading sessions.
The current FLG drawdown is -66.49%. The current MAC drawdown is -58.35%.
| Rank | FLG | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -80.10% Jul 31, 2023 - Apr 30, 2024 | -93.28% Feb 7, 2007 - Apr 29, 2013 |
| #2 | -69.83% Feb 27, 2004 - May 4, 2015 | -92.92% Aug 1, 2016 - Apr 2, 2020 |
| #3 | -49.93% Oct 19, 2021 - Jul 27, 2023 | -26.80% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004 |
| #4 | -45.61% Oct 28, 2015 - Oct 7, 2021 | -23.77% Aug 1, 2000 - May 4, 2001 |
| #5 | -44.68% Nov 10, 1999 - Dec 4, 2000 | -22.33% Mar 16, 2015 - Jul 13, 2016 |
| #6 | -39.04% Aug 16, 2001 - Aug 8, 2002 | -21.21% May 20, 2013 - Jul 18, 2014 |
| #7 | -21.36% Aug 19, 2002 - Apr 10, 2003 | -18.69% Jan 20, 2000 - May 1, 2000 |
| #8 | -11.33% Jul 31, 2015 - Oct 23, 2015 | -16.70% Dec 17, 2004 - May 20, 2005 |
| #9 | -11.20% Jul 14, 2003 - Sep 23, 2003 | -14.68% Aug 22, 2001 - Nov 15, 2001 |
| #10 | -10.25% Feb 13, 2001 - Mar 28, 2001 | -14.03% Jun 28, 2002 - Aug 26, 2002 |
| #11 | -10.16% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 29, 2001 | -13.59% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 5, 2006 |
| #12 | -6.06% Dec 2, 2003 - Jan 14, 2004 | -12.53% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 28, 1999 |
| #13 | -6.00% Jun 12, 2003 - Jun 27, 2003 | -11.31% Sep 26, 2002 - Dec 5, 2002 |
| #14 | -5.09% Sep 23, 2003 - Oct 16, 2003 | -10.58% Apr 12, 2002 - Jun 27, 2002 |
| #15 | -4.69% Nov 7, 2003 - Nov 25, 2003 | -8.74% Mar 29, 2006 - Aug 30, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between FLG and MAC is 0.50 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FLG vs MAC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FLG | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.08% | 0.77% |
| 2025 | 0.32% | 3.68% |
| 2024 | 2.14% | 3.41% |
| 2023 | 6.65% | 4.41% |
| 2022 | 7.91% | 5.51% |
| 2021 | 5.57% | 3.47% |
| 2020 | 6.45% | 10.78% |
| 2019 | 5.66% | 11.14% |
| 2018 | 7.23% | 6.86% |
| 2017 | 5.22% | 4.37% |
| 2016 | 4.27% | 3.88% |
| 2015 | 6.13% | 5.74% |
| 2014 | 6.25% | 3.01% |
| 2013 | 5.93% | 4.01% |
| 2012 | 7.63% | 3.83% |
| 2011 | 8.08% | 4.05% |
| 2010 | 5.31% | 4.43% |
| 2009 | 6.89% | 7.23% |
| 2008 | 8.36% | 17.62% |
| 2007 | 5.69% | 4.12% |
| 2006 | 6.21% | 3.18% |
| 2005 | 6.05% | 3.92% |
| 2004 | 4.67% | 3.95% |
| 2003 | 2.31% | 5.21% |
| 2002 | 2.63% | 7.22% |
| 2001 | 2.35% | 8.05% |
| 2000 | 2.72% | 10.73% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 2.45% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks