StockComparison Logo
vs

FITB vs FANG

Comparison between Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB, Company) and Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG, Company).

FITB is from the Financial Services sector, while FANG is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceFANG has outperformed FITB, delivering a return of +24.0% compared to +12.7%

FITB vs FANG - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
FITB
$52B
Winner
FANG
$52B
Max Drawdown
FITB
98.52%
Winner
FANG
88.88%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
FITB
1.34
FANG
0.95
5Y Beta
FITB
0.96
Winner
FANG
0.69
Industry
FITB
Banks - Regional
FANG
Oil & Gas E&p
P/E Ratio
Winner
FITB
23.45
FANG
35.65
Forward P/E
FITB
14.06
Winner
FANG
9.41
PEG Ratio
Winner
FITB
4.10
FANG
56.78
Dividend Yield
Winner
FITB
2.77%
FANG
2.22%
5Y Dividends CAGR
FITB
12.77%
Winner
FANG
27.14%
5Y EPS CAGR
FITB
0.20%
FANG
N/A
Debt to Equity
FITB
64.58%
Winner
FANG
33.28%
Free Cash Flow Yield
FITB
5.79%
Winner
FANG
19.42%
P/S Ratio
FITB
5.18
Winner
FANG
3.18
P/B Ratio
FITB
1.62
Winner
FANG
1.56

FITB vs FANG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
FITB
-1.61%
Winner
FANG
+9.15%
3M
Winner
FITB
+12.83%
FANG
-2.26%
6M
FITB
+5.04%
Winner
FANG
+14.89%
1Y
Winner
FITB
+42.73%
FANG
+34.73%
5Y(CAGR)
FITB
+12.71%
Winner
FANG
+24.00%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
FITB
+15.22%
FANG
+10.32%
Max(CAGR)
FITB
+3.48%
Winner
FANG
+21.16%

FITB vs FANG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFITBFANG
2026+21.27%+25.90%
2025+15.05%-7.29%
2024+26.06%+9.01%
2023+10.96%+24.53%
2022-23.88%+30.67%
2021+64.46%+124.93%
2020-6.21%-45.88%
2019+31.40%-1.76%
2018-20.55%-27.29%
2017+14.66%+22.28%
2016+41.72%+52.87%
2015+2.10%+11.63%
2014+0.01%+16.85%
2013+36.82%+174.85%
2012+19.14%+9.26%
2011-11.91%N/A
2010+45.50%N/A
2009+14.38%N/A
2008-64.59%N/A
2007-35.49%N/A
2006+12.55%N/A
2005-17.70%N/A
2004-17.02%N/A
2003-0.27%N/A
2002-3.02%N/A
2001+8.69%N/A
2000+30.13%N/A
1999+0.08%N/A

FITB vs FANG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FITB was -98.13%, occurring on Feb 20, 2009. Recovery took 4795 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FANG was -88.72%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 841 trading sessions.

The current FITB drawdown is -4.06%. The current FANG drawdown is -10.77%.

RankFITBFANG
#1-98.13%
Apr 12, 2002 - Apr 29, 2021
-88.72%
Oct 3, 2018 - Feb 4, 2022
#2-51.66%
Jan 14, 2022 - Oct 17, 2024
-42.60%
Jun 23, 2014 - May 26, 2016
#3-39.75%
Nov 16, 1999 - Sep 11, 2000
-42.10%
Jul 17, 2024 - Mar 26, 2026
#4-29.96%
Nov 25, 2024 - Dec 10, 2025
-33.47%
Jun 7, 2022 - Oct 31, 2022
#5-22.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Jun 4, 2001
-24.11%
Feb 15, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017
#6-21.21%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
-23.95%
Nov 15, 2022 - Oct 12, 2023
#7-19.17%
Oct 5, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000
-19.42%
Nov 5, 2013 - Feb 7, 2014
#8-18.71%
May 17, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021
-19.09%
May 4, 2026 - Jul 1, 2026
#9-16.96%
Aug 22, 2001 - Mar 1, 2002
-18.43%
May 21, 2018 - Oct 1, 2018
#10-9.67%
Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
-16.48%
Jan 23, 2018 - Mar 26, 2018
#11-6.19%
Sep 11, 2000 - Sep 26, 2000
-14.97%
Mar 26, 2018 - May 8, 2018
#12-6.00%
Jan 21, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026
-14.42%
Mar 25, 2022 - May 26, 2022
#13-5.60%
Oct 17, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
-13.50%
Feb 19, 2013 - Mar 5, 2013
#14-5.26%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 15, 1999
-13.24%
Oct 10, 2016 - Nov 30, 2016
#15-5.25%
Jun 21, 2001 - Jul 13, 2001
-11.93%
Oct 18, 2023 - Feb 14, 2024

Correlation

Correlation between FITB and FANG is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.85
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

FITB vs FANG dividend yield comparison.

YearFITBFANG
20261.40%1.13%
20253.29%2.66%
20243.41%5.06%
20233.94%5.15%
20223.84%6.55%
20212.62%1.62%
20203.92%3.10%
20193.06%0.74%
20183.14%0.40%
20171.98%0.00%
20161.97%0.00%
20152.59%0.00%
20142.50%0.00%
20132.23%0.00%
20122.37%0.00%
20112.20%0.00%
20100.27%0.00%
20090.41%0.00%
20089.08%0.00%
20076.76%0.00%
20063.86%0.00%
20053.87%0.00%
20042.77%0.00%
20031.91%0.00%
20021.67%0.00%
20011.35%0.00%
20001.17%0.00%
19990.33%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare