StockComparison Logo
vs

FITB vs CAH

Comparison between Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB, Company) and Cardinal Health Inc (CAH, Company).

FITB is from the Financial Services sector, while CAH is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceCAH has outperformed FITB, delivering a return of +33.6% compared to +14.0%

FITB vs CAH - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
FITB
$52B
CAH
$52B
Max Drawdown
FITB
98.52%
Winner
CAH
67.57%
Sharpe Ratio
FITB
1.23
Winner
CAH
1.26
5Y Beta
FITB
0.96
Winner
CAH
0.27
Industry
FITB
Banks - Regional
CAH
Medical Distribution
P/E Ratio
Winner
FITB
26.22
CAH
28.97
Forward P/E
Winner
FITB
14.03
CAH
19.12
PEG Ratio
FITB
2.09
Winner
CAH
0.36
Dividend Yield
Winner
FITB
2.77%
CAH
0.90%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
FITB
12.77%
CAH
5.60%
5Y EPS CAGR
FITB
2.52%
Winner
CAH
10.18%
Debt to Equity
FITB
58.76%
Winner
CAH
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
FITB
2.99%
Winner
CAH
10.58%
P/S Ratio
FITB
5.14
Winner
CAH
0.21
P/B Ratio
Winner
FITB
1.62
CAH
16.07

FITB vs CAH - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
FITB
+5.31%
CAH
-1.05%
3M
Winner
FITB
+13.14%
CAH
+10.64%
6M
Winner
FITB
+14.45%
CAH
+8.98%
1Y
FITB
+38.26%
Winner
CAH
+44.74%
5Y(CAGR)
FITB
+13.99%
Winner
CAH
+33.62%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
FITB
+15.96%
CAH
+13.66%
Max(CAGR)
FITB
+3.50%
Winner
CAH
+11.20%

FITB vs CAH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFITBCAH
2026+21.72%+10.37%
2025+15.05%+75.87%
2024+26.06%+16.90%
2023+10.96%+34.37%
2022-23.88%+52.59%
2021+64.46%+0.83%
2020-6.21%+11.13%
2019+31.40%+16.76%
2018-20.55%-26.84%
2017+14.66%-15.59%
2016+41.72%-16.31%
2015+2.10%+12.86%
2014+0.01%+24.29%
2013+36.82%+64.01%
2012+19.14%+1.64%
2011-11.91%+6.56%
2010+45.50%+20.32%
2009+14.38%+29.89%
2008-64.59%-38.35%
2007-35.49%-9.16%
2006+12.55%-7.40%
2005-17.70%+20.64%
2004-17.02%-2.36%
2003-0.27%-0.67%
2002-3.02%-7.46%
2001+8.69%-0.13%
2000+30.13%+102.37%
1999+0.08%+8.11%

FITB vs CAH Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FITB was -98.13%, occurring on Feb 20, 2009. Recovery took 4795 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CAH was -61.92%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 3015 trading sessions.

The current FITB drawdown is -3.71%. The current CAH drawdown is -5.72%.

RankFITBCAH
#1-98.13%
Apr 12, 2002 - Apr 29, 2021
-61.92%
Jun 20, 2001 - Jun 18, 2013
#2-51.66%
Jan 14, 2022 - Oct 17, 2024
-48.94%
Dec 30, 2015 - Oct 21, 2022
#3-39.75%
Nov 16, 1999 - Sep 11, 2000
-37.37%
Jan 14, 2000 - May 15, 2000
#4-29.96%
Nov 25, 2024 - Dec 10, 2025
-20.42%
Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026
#5-22.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Jun 4, 2001
-18.14%
Mar 12, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024
#6-21.21%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
-17.80%
Nov 29, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000
#7-19.17%
Oct 5, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000
-15.34%
Apr 22, 2015 - Dec 29, 2015
#8-18.71%
May 17, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021
-15.30%
Dec 28, 2000 - May 11, 2001
#9-16.96%
Aug 22, 2001 - Mar 1, 2002
-14.23%
Nov 7, 2022 - Apr 11, 2023
#10-9.67%
Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
-12.88%
Jul 7, 2025 - Oct 30, 2025
#11-6.19%
Sep 11, 2000 - Sep 26, 2000
-12.87%
Mar 4, 2014 - Aug 21, 2014
#12-6.00%
Jan 21, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026
-9.86%
Apr 2, 2025 - Apr 29, 2025
#13-5.60%
Oct 17, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
-9.79%
Jul 5, 2023 - Nov 3, 2023
#14-5.26%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 15, 1999
-9.74%
Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000
#15-5.25%
Jun 21, 2001 - Jul 13, 2001
-8.26%
Dec 13, 2023 - Jan 31, 2024

Correlation

Correlation between FITB and CAH is 0.66 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.66
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

FITB vs CAH dividend yield comparison.

YearFITBCAH
20261.40%0.68%
20253.29%0.99%
20243.41%1.28%
20233.94%1.98%
20223.84%2.57%
20212.62%3.80%
20203.92%3.62%
20193.06%3.80%
20183.14%4.24%
20171.98%3.00%
20161.97%2.41%
20152.59%1.68%
20142.50%1.65%
20132.23%1.77%
20122.37%2.34%
20112.20%2.07%
20100.27%1.98%
20090.41%32.30%
20089.08%1.57%
20076.76%0.78%
20063.86%0.51%
20053.87%0.31%
20042.77%0.21%
20031.91%0.43%
20021.67%0.17%
20011.35%0.15%
20001.17%0.12%
19990.33%0.05%

Select Stocks to Compare