FE vs NMR
Comparison between Firstenergy Corp (FE, Company) and Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company).
FE is from the Utilities sector, while NMR is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed FE, delivering a return of +18.3% compared to +9.5%
FE vs NMR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FE vs NMR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FE vs NMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FE | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.51% | +17.82% |
| 2025 | +16.83% | +53.57% |
| 2024 | +10.99% | +35.63% |
| 2023 | -9.06% | +21.20% |
| 2022 | +5.72% | -12.30% |
| 2021 | +47.07% | -17.05% |
| 2020 | -32.72% | +3.34% |
| 2019 | +37.14% | +35.43% |
| 2018 | +27.00% | -36.95% |
| 2017 | +3.63% | -0.51% |
| 2016 | +2.63% | +10.26% |
| 2015 | -15.64% | +0.64% |
| 2014 | +25.76% | -23.82% |
| 2013 | -16.96% | +29.46% |
| 2012 | +2.36% | +92.81% |
| 2011 | +27.44% | -52.04% |
| 2010 | -16.15% | -14.33% |
| 2009 | -1.67% | -11.17% |
| 2008 | -30.14% | -49.10% |
| 2007 | +23.39% | -11.80% |
| 2006 | +24.67% | -1.99% |
| 2005 | +29.25% | +34.20% |
| 2004 | +16.16% | -14.69% |
| 2003 | +11.71% | +52.55% |
| 2002 | -1.86% | -13.30% |
| 2001 | +19.96% | -29.05% |
| 2000 | +51.92% | +2.57% |
| 1999 | -12.31% | +11.76% |
FE vs NMR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FE was -55.72%, occurring on Mar 13, 2009. Recovery took 2815 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current FE drawdown is -3.69%. The current NMR drawdown is -51.19%.
| Rank | FE | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -55.72% Jul 11, 2008 - Sep 17, 2019 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 |
| #2 | -47.67% Feb 18, 2020 - Apr 6, 2022 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 |
| #3 | -34.46% Mar 11, 2002 - May 27, 2003 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 |
| #4 | -28.73% Nov 3, 1999 - Apr 24, 2000 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 |
| #5 | -28.58% Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 28, 2024 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 |
| #6 | -27.06% Jul 2, 2003 - Feb 3, 2004 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 |
| #7 | -19.04% Dec 26, 2000 - Jun 18, 2001 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 |
| #8 | -16.82% May 21, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 |
| #9 | -14.88% Aug 3, 2000 - Sep 13, 2000 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 |
| #10 | -14.72% Apr 9, 2026 - May 15, 2026 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 |
| #11 | -13.01% Sep 4, 2024 - Aug 1, 2025 | N/A |
| #12 | -12.77% Jan 10, 2008 - Apr 23, 2008 | N/A |
| #13 | -12.42% Sep 9, 2005 - May 5, 2006 | N/A |
| #14 | -11.43% Oct 2, 2000 - Nov 16, 2000 | N/A |
| #15 | -11.33% Nov 12, 2004 - Apr 12, 2005 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between FE and NMR is -0.37 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FE vs NMR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FE | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.84% | 1.54% |
| 2025 | 3.93% | 4.91% |
| 2024 | 4.24% | 4.29% |
| 2023 | 4.31% | 1.20% |
| 2022 | 3.72% | 3.86% |
| 2021 | 3.75% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 5.10% | 0.86% |
| 2019 | 3.13% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 3.83% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 4.70% | 1.70% |
| 2016 | 4.65% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 4.54% | 3.34% |
| 2014 | 3.69% | 2.44% |
| 2013 | 6.67% | 1.77% |
| 2012 | 5.27% | 1.28% |
| 2011 | 7.45% | 5.11% |
| 2010 | 5.94% | 1.37% |
| 2009 | 4.74% | 0.57% |
| 2008 | 4.53% | 2.85% |
| 2007 | 2.76% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.99% | 2.36% |
| 2005 | 3.40% | 1.07% |
| 2004 | 3.80% | 1.08% |
| 2003 | 4.26% | 1.03% |
| 2002 | 4.55% | 1.05% |
| 2001 | 4.29% | 5.57% |
| 2000 | 4.75% | 6.49% |
| 1999 | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks