FDMT vs SCVL

Comparison between 4D Molecular Therapeutics Inc (FDMT, Company) and Shoe Carnival Inc (SCVL, Company).

FDMT is from the Healthcare sector, while SCVL is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceSCVL has outperformed FDMT, delivering a return of -10.9% compared to -20.8%

FDMT vs SCVL - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	FDMT(COMPANY)	SCVL(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$456M	$456M
Max Drawdown	95.23%	82.02%
Sharpe Ratio	1.17	-0.04
5Y Beta	1.35	1.28
Industry	Biotechnology	Apparel Retail
P/E Ratio	-2.59	12.10
Forward P/E	N/A	11.26
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.95
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.71%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	30.30%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	-3.74%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-28.45%	13.64%
P/S Ratio	5.17	0.41
P/B Ratio	1.01	0.68

Market Cap

FDMT

$456M

Winner

SCVL

$456M

Max Drawdown

FDMT

95.23%

Winner

SCVL

82.02%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

FDMT

1.17

SCVL

-0.04

5Y Beta

FDMT

1.35

Winner

SCVL

1.28

Industry

FDMT

Biotechnology

SCVL

Apparel Retail

P/E Ratio

Winner

FDMT

-2.59

SCVL

12.10

Forward P/E

FDMT

N/A

SCVL

11.26

PEG Ratio

FDMT

N/A

SCVL

0.95

Dividend Yield

FDMT

N/A

SCVL

3.71%

5Y Dividends CAGR

FDMT

N/A

SCVL

30.30%

5Y EPS CAGR

FDMT

N/A

SCVL

-3.74%

Debt to Equity

FDMT

0.00%

SCVL

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

FDMT

-28.45%

Winner

SCVL

13.64%

P/S Ratio

FDMT

5.17

Winner

SCVL

0.41

P/B Ratio

FDMT

1.01

Winner

SCVL

0.68

FDMT vs SCVL - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	FDMT	SCVL
1 month	-14.60%	+6.56%
3 months	+4.50%	-3.33%
6 months	-18.54%	-5.57%
1 year	+96.22%	-9.17%
5 years(CAGR)	-20.77%	-10.88%
10 years(CAGR)	N/A	+5.15%
Max(CAGR)	-24.19%	+7.38%

FDMT

-14.60%

Winner

SCVL

+6.56%

Winner

FDMT

+4.50%

SCVL

-3.33%

FDMT

-18.54%

Winner

SCVL

-5.57%

Winner

FDMT

+96.22%

SCVL

-9.17%

5Y(CAGR)

FDMT

-20.77%

Winner

SCVL

-10.88%

10Y(CAGR)

FDMT

N/A

SCVL

+5.15%

Max(CAGR)

FDMT

-24.19%

Winner

SCVL

+7.38%

FDMT vs SCVL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	FDMT	SCVL
2026	+20.63%	+1.12%
2025	+28.64%	-46.37%
2024	-73.79%	+14.28%
2023	-1.84%	+34.72%
2022	-1.90%	-40.17%
2021	-41.79%	+112.96%
2020	+2.35%	+6.43%
2019	N/A	+7.02%
2018	N/A	+25.30%
2017	N/A	-0.56%
2016	N/A	+17.64%
2015	N/A	-6.88%
2014	N/A	-10.73%
2013	N/A	+43.10%
2012	N/A	+27.31%
2011	N/A	-5.93%
2010	N/A	+31.90%
2009	N/A	+111.46%
2008	N/A	-32.75%
2007	N/A	-55.09%
2006	N/A	+43.96%
2005	N/A	+70.59%
2004	N/A	-25.93%
2003	N/A	+20.41%
2002	N/A	+3.39%
2001	N/A	+111.33%
2000	N/A	-31.01%
1999	N/A	+0.60%

FDMT vs SCVL Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FDMT was -95.23%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for SCVL was -82.02%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1367 trading sessions.

The current FDMT drawdown is -83.24%. The current SCVL drawdown is -60.22%.

Rank	FDMT	SCVL
#1	-95.23% Feb 11, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025	-82.02% Mar 22, 2007 - Aug 22, 2012
#2	-23.56% Dec 18, 2020 - Jan 19, 2021	-69.54% Apr 7, 2000 - Aug 29, 2001
#3	-14.25% Jan 19, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021	-68.53% Aug 31, 2018 - Jan 14, 2021
#4	-5.58% Feb 5, 2021 - Feb 11, 2021	-65.15% Sep 19, 2024 - Mar 30, 2026
#5	-5.11% Dec 11, 2020 - Dec 18, 2020	-55.00% Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2024
#6	N/A	-53.92% Jul 1, 2002 - Jul 5, 2005
#7	N/A	-50.60% Nov 23, 2016 - May 25, 2018
#8	N/A	-43.68% Jul 28, 2005 - Mar 22, 2006
#9	N/A	-41.35% Jan 3, 2014 - Mar 30, 2015
#10	N/A	-38.39% Jun 26, 2015 - Aug 23, 2016
#11	N/A	-34.46% Aug 29, 2001 - Dec 6, 2001
#12	N/A	-31.23% May 9, 2006 - Oct 26, 2006
#13	N/A	-29.71% Nov 19, 1999 - Apr 6, 2000
#14	N/A	-21.21% Aug 24, 2021 - Nov 15, 2021
#15	N/A	-18.20% Jun 24, 2021 - Aug 24, 2021