FCG vs PDT
Comparison between FIRST TRUST NATURAL GAS ETF (FCG, ETF) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFCG has outperformed PDT, delivering a return of +15.4% compared to +2.6%
FCG vs PDT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FCG vs PDT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FCG vs PDT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FCG | PDT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +13.31% | +3.70% |
| 2025 | -4.15% | +7.88% |
| 2024 | +3.63% | +28.48% |
| 2023 | +8.47% | -10.25% |
| 2022 | +41.72% | -16.41% |
| 2021 | +95.33% | +27.89% |
| 2020 | -22.08% | -14.36% |
| 2019 | -18.11% | +38.87% |
| 2018 | -36.53% | -11.60% |
| 2017 | -11.75% | +20.46% |
| 2016 | +17.98% | +25.22% |
| 2015 | -60.10% | +7.79% |
| 2014 | -41.72% | +26.06% |
| 2013 | +22.74% | -6.71% |
| 2012 | -16.57% | +8.08% |
| 2011 | -8.25% | +25.48% |
| 2010 | +6.38% | +25.49% |
| 2009 | +40.30% | +47.06% |
| 2008 | -48.08% | -21.88% |
| 2007 | +12.69% | -7.93% |
| 2006 | N/A | +19.70% |
| 2005 | N/A | -7.29% |
| 2004 | N/A | +9.54% |
| 2003 | N/A | +25.14% |
| 2002 | N/A | -2.21% |
| 2001 | N/A | +12.40% |
| 2000 | N/A | +19.49% |
| 1999 | N/A | -10.19% |
FCG vs PDT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FCG was -97.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for PDT was -62.37%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 325 trading sessions.
The current FCG drawdown is -78.06%. The current PDT drawdown is -3.94%.
| Rank | FCG | PDT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -97.36% Jun 18, 2008 - Mar 23, 2020 | -62.37% Feb 20, 2020 - Jun 4, 2021 |
| #2 | -16.09% Jun 15, 2007 - Oct 12, 2007 | -52.75% May 21, 2007 - Sep 30, 2009 |
| #3 | -11.85% Jan 14, 2008 - Feb 20, 2008 | -40.45% Nov 17, 2021 - May 30, 2025 |
| #4 | -11.29% Nov 6, 2007 - Jan 14, 2008 | -21.71% Sep 7, 2016 - Apr 18, 2017 |
| #5 | -11.01% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 | -20.67% Mar 29, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004 |
| #6 | -5.88% May 20, 2008 - Jun 9, 2008 | -19.39% May 8, 2013 - Apr 30, 2014 |
| #7 | -5.70% Apr 21, 2008 - May 6, 2008 | -18.63% Jul 6, 2018 - Feb 8, 2019 |
| #8 | -4.23% Oct 18, 2007 - Oct 26, 2007 | -17.19% Nov 18, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 |
| #9 | -4.03% Jun 4, 2007 - Jun 15, 2007 | -17.12% Jun 3, 2002 - Jan 8, 2003 |
| #10 | -2.43% Jun 9, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008 | -16.62% Jul 12, 2005 - Dec 15, 2006 |
| #11 | -2.25% Feb 20, 2008 - Feb 25, 2008 | -15.58% Jun 29, 2012 - Apr 23, 2013 |
| #12 | -2.23% May 22, 2007 - May 30, 2007 | -14.14% Jul 14, 2011 - Nov 17, 2011 |
| #13 | -1.59% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2007 | -13.31% Dec 22, 2017 - Jul 5, 2018 |
| #14 | -1.38% Oct 29, 2007 - Oct 31, 2007 | -11.31% Jul 3, 2003 - Oct 31, 2003 |
| #15 | -1.37% Apr 16, 2008 - Apr 18, 2008 | -10.31% May 3, 2010 - Jul 12, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between FCG and PDT is -0.78 which considered as a strong negative correlation - the stocks tend to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FCG vs PDT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FCG | PDT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.54% | 3.89% |
| 2025 | 2.86% | 7.80% |
| 2024 | 2.76% | 7.77% |
| 2023 | 3.25% | 10.14% |
| 2022 | 3.04% | 9.04% |
| 2021 | 1.73% | 6.42% |
| 2020 | 3.82% | 8.43% |
| 2019 | 2.87% | 6.70% |
| 2018 | 1.46% | 8.69% |
| 2017 | 1.56% | 9.94% |
| 2016 | 1.36% | 9.15% |
| 2015 | 0.96% | 7.88% |
| 2014 | 0.27% | 6.66% |
| 2013 | 0.07% | 10.82% |
| 2012 | 0.08% | 6.68% |
| 2011 | 0.08% | 7.30% |
| 2010 | 0.05% | 7.58% |
| 2009 | 0.08% | 7.57% |
| 2008 | 0.25% | 9.95% |
| 2007 | 0.02% | 6.14% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 5.49% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 7.45% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 6.78% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 7.16% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 10.52% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 7.06% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.08% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks