FCFS vs WMS
Comparison between FirstCash Holdings Inc (FCFS, Company) and Advanced Drainage Systems Inc (WMS, Company).
FCFS is from the Financial Services sector, while WMS is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceFCFS has outperformed WMS, delivering a return of +24.5% compared to +4.8%
FCFS vs WMS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FCFS vs WMS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FCFS vs WMS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FCFS | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +42.99% | -6.30% |
| 2025 | +57.22% | +27.38% |
| 2024 | -1.89% | -15.82% |
| 2023 | +24.87% | +73.91% |
| 2022 | +18.97% | -38.78% |
| 2021 | +13.47% | +69.49% |
| 2020 | -12.96% | +114.18% |
| 2019 | +13.51% | +67.92% |
| 2018 | +7.83% | +2.36% |
| 2017 | +44.66% | +15.31% |
| 2016 | +28.45% | -8.96% |
| 2015 | -31.18% | +5.56% |
| 2014 | -10.08% | +42.54% |
| 2013 | +23.26% | N/A |
| 2012 | +41.73% | N/A |
| 2011 | +9.42% | N/A |
| 2010 | +36.58% | N/A |
| 2009 | +15.51% | N/A |
| 2008 | +34.60% | N/A |
| 2007 | -41.79% | N/A |
| 2006 | +78.23% | N/A |
| 2005 | +9.62% | N/A |
| 2004 | +53.28% | N/A |
| 2003 | +140.76% | N/A |
| 2002 | +40.82% | N/A |
| 2001 | +210.80% | N/A |
| 2000 | -71.88% | N/A |
| 1999 | -10.81% | N/A |
FCFS vs WMS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FCFS was -82.10%, occurring on Nov 15, 2000. Recovery took 613 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for WMS was -53.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 115 trading sessions.
The current FCFS drawdown is -4.01%. The current WMS drawdown is -21.10%.
| Rank | FCFS | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.10% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 | -53.57% Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 3, 2020 |
| #2 | -71.13% Dec 28, 2006 - Sep 24, 2010 | -50.13% Aug 16, 2022 - Feb 8, 2024 |
| #3 | -52.47% Nov 29, 2013 - Sep 25, 2017 | -45.75% May 21, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #4 | -50.15% Jul 24, 2019 - Apr 27, 2023 | -44.28% Jun 18, 2015 - Aug 27, 2018 |
| #5 | -38.17% Dec 23, 2004 - Nov 3, 2005 | -39.94% Dec 8, 2021 - Aug 4, 2022 |
| #6 | -34.05% Jun 3, 2002 - Dec 17, 2002 | -29.58% Aug 30, 2018 - Jun 20, 2019 |
| #7 | -34.00% Sep 19, 2011 - Jan 17, 2013 | -14.85% Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 12, 2021 |
| #8 | -31.86% Apr 8, 2004 - Nov 10, 2004 | -13.76% Jan 7, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021 |
| #9 | -27.76% Jun 6, 2018 - Apr 25, 2019 | -13.50% Aug 3, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021 |
| #10 | -24.68% Apr 18, 2006 - Oct 16, 2006 | -13.23% Oct 12, 2020 - Dec 2, 2020 |
| #11 | -23.38% Apr 23, 2024 - Apr 24, 2025 | -12.43% Apr 16, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 |
| #12 | -22.18% Dec 17, 2002 - Apr 17, 2003 | -12.26% Aug 8, 2019 - Oct 9, 2019 |
| #13 | -16.67% Sep 24, 2003 - Oct 22, 2003 | -10.72% Mar 31, 2015 - May 13, 2015 |
| #14 | -16.18% Mar 28, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013 | -10.43% Nov 12, 2014 - Jan 8, 2015 |
| #15 | -15.30% May 5, 2023 - Oct 17, 2023 | -9.96% Oct 23, 2014 - Nov 6, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between FCFS and WMS is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2014 - 2026)
FCFS vs WMS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FCFS | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.38% | 0.13% |
| 2025 | 1.00% | 0.48% |
| 2024 | 1.41% | 0.54% |
| 2023 | 1.25% | 0.38% |
| 2022 | 1.45% | 0.57% |
| 2021 | 1.56% | 0.31% |
| 2020 | 1.54% | 0.43% |
| 2019 | 1.27% | 3.48% |
| 2018 | 1.26% | 1.28% |
| 2017 | 1.14% | 1.13% |
| 2016 | 1.20% | 1.12% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 0.79% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks