FANG vs MET
Comparison between Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG, Company) and Metlife Inc (MET, Company).
FANG is from the Energy sector, while MET is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceFANG has outperformed MET, delivering a return of +22.2% compared to +10.0%
FANG vs MET - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FANG vs MET - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FANG vs MET - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FANG | MET |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +27.56% | +12.28% |
| 2025 | -7.29% | -0.68% |
| 2024 | +9.01% | +25.32% |
| 2023 | +24.53% | -5.22% |
| 2022 | +30.67% | +17.84% |
| 2021 | +124.93% | +39.94% |
| 2020 | -45.88% | -4.75% |
| 2019 | -1.76% | +26.96% |
| 2018 | -27.29% | -15.17% |
| 2017 | +22.28% | +20.73% |
| 2016 | +52.87% | +18.14% |
| 2015 | +11.63% | -7.99% |
| 2014 | +16.85% | +4.36% |
| 2013 | +174.85% | +56.96% |
| 2012 | +9.26% | +5.14% |
| 2011 | N/A | -30.90% |
| 2010 | N/A | +24.58% |
| 2009 | N/A | +0.43% |
| 2008 | N/A | -39.80% |
| 2007 | N/A | +3.63% |
| 2006 | N/A | +18.01% |
| 2005 | N/A | +23.28% |
| 2004 | N/A | +22.16% |
| 2003 | N/A | +21.79% |
| 2002 | N/A | -12.17% |
| 2001 | N/A | -6.14% |
| 2000 | N/A | +127.52% |
FANG vs MET Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FANG was -88.72%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 841 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MET was -82.33%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2306 trading sessions.
The current FANG drawdown is -9.60%.
| Rank | FANG | MET |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -88.72% Oct 3, 2018 - Feb 4, 2022 | -82.33% Oct 5, 2007 - Dec 1, 2016 |
| #2 | -42.60% Jun 23, 2014 - May 26, 2016 | -55.16% Feb 12, 2020 - Jan 14, 2021 |
| #3 | -42.10% Jul 17, 2024 - Mar 26, 2026 | -42.73% Dec 8, 2000 - Mar 29, 2004 |
| #4 | -33.47% Jun 7, 2022 - Oct 31, 2022 | -35.09% Nov 25, 2022 - Mar 27, 2024 |
| #5 | -24.11% Feb 15, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 | -28.35% Nov 2, 2017 - Jan 2, 2020 |
| #6 | -23.95% Nov 15, 2022 - Oct 12, 2023 | -21.97% Nov 27, 2024 - Jun 9, 2026 |
| #7 | -19.42% Nov 5, 2013 - Feb 7, 2014 | -19.45% Apr 20, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022 |
| #8 | -18.43% May 21, 2018 - Oct 1, 2018 | -16.22% May 7, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021 |
| #9 | -16.48% Jan 23, 2018 - Mar 26, 2018 | -15.13% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 8, 2004 |
| #10 | -14.97% Mar 26, 2018 - May 8, 2018 | -13.64% May 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 |
| #11 | -14.42% Mar 25, 2022 - May 26, 2022 | -13.60% Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 6, 2022 |
| #12 | -13.50% Feb 19, 2013 - Mar 5, 2013 | -13.43% Feb 15, 2022 - Mar 30, 2022 |
| #13 | -13.24% Oct 10, 2016 - Nov 30, 2016 | -12.65% Sep 28, 2000 - Oct 31, 2000 |
| #14 | -11.93% Oct 18, 2023 - Feb 14, 2024 | -12.64% Nov 16, 2000 - Dec 4, 2000 |
| #15 | -11.69% May 4, 2026 - May 8, 2026 | -11.90% Jun 2, 2000 - Jun 29, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between FANG and MET is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FANG vs MET dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FANG | MET |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.12% | 1.31% |
| 2025 | 2.66% | 2.85% |
| 2024 | 5.06% | 2.63% |
| 2023 | 5.15% | 3.12% |
| 2022 | 6.55% | 2.74% |
| 2021 | 1.62% | 3.04% |
| 2020 | 3.10% | 3.88% |
| 2019 | 0.74% | 3.41% |
| 2018 | 0.40% | 4.04% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 14.52% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.92% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 3.06% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.45% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.87% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 2.25% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.67% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.09% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.12% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.00% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.14% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.68% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.78% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.63% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.57% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks