StockComparison Logo
vs

FANG vs FITB

Comparison between Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG, Company) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB, Company).

FANG is from the Energy sector, while FITB is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceFANG has outperformed FITB, delivering a return of +24.0% compared to +12.7%

FANG vs FITB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
FANG
$52B
FITB
$52B
Max Drawdown
Winner
FANG
88.88%
FITB
98.52%
Sharpe Ratio
FANG
0.95
Winner
FITB
1.34
5Y Beta
Winner
FANG
0.69
FITB
0.96
Industry
FANG
Oil & Gas E&p
FITB
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
FANG
35.65
Winner
FITB
23.45
Forward P/E
Winner
FANG
9.41
FITB
14.06
PEG Ratio
FANG
56.78
Winner
FITB
4.10
Dividend Yield
FANG
2.22%
Winner
FITB
2.77%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
FANG
27.14%
FITB
12.77%
5Y EPS CAGR
FANG
N/A
FITB
0.20%
Debt to Equity
Winner
FANG
33.28%
FITB
64.58%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
FANG
19.42%
FITB
5.79%
P/S Ratio
Winner
FANG
3.18
FITB
5.18
P/B Ratio
Winner
FANG
1.56
FITB
1.62

FANG vs FITB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
FANG
+9.15%
FITB
-1.61%
3M
FANG
-2.26%
Winner
FITB
+12.83%
6M
Winner
FANG
+14.89%
FITB
+5.04%
1Y
FANG
+34.73%
Winner
FITB
+42.73%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
FANG
+24.00%
FITB
+12.71%
10Y(CAGR)
FANG
+10.32%
Winner
FITB
+15.22%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
FANG
+21.16%
FITB
+3.48%

FANG vs FITB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFANGFITB
2026+25.90%+21.27%
2025-7.29%+15.05%
2024+9.01%+26.06%
2023+24.53%+10.96%
2022+30.67%-23.88%
2021+124.93%+64.46%
2020-45.88%-6.21%
2019-1.76%+31.40%
2018-27.29%-20.55%
2017+22.28%+14.66%
2016+52.87%+41.72%
2015+11.63%+2.10%
2014+16.85%+0.01%
2013+174.85%+36.82%
2012+9.26%+19.14%
2011N/A-11.91%
2010N/A+45.50%
2009N/A+14.38%
2008N/A-64.59%
2007N/A-35.49%
2006N/A+12.55%
2005N/A-17.70%
2004N/A-17.02%
2003N/A-0.27%
2002N/A-3.02%
2001N/A+8.69%
2000N/A+30.13%
1999N/A+0.08%

FANG vs FITB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FANG was -88.72%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 841 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FITB was -98.13%, occurring on Feb 20, 2009. Recovery took 4795 trading sessions.

The current FANG drawdown is -10.77%. The current FITB drawdown is -4.06%.

RankFANGFITB
#1-88.72%
Oct 3, 2018 - Feb 4, 2022
-98.13%
Apr 12, 2002 - Apr 29, 2021
#2-42.60%
Jun 23, 2014 - May 26, 2016
-51.66%
Jan 14, 2022 - Oct 17, 2024
#3-42.10%
Jul 17, 2024 - Mar 26, 2026
-39.75%
Nov 16, 1999 - Sep 11, 2000
#4-33.47%
Jun 7, 2022 - Oct 31, 2022
-29.96%
Nov 25, 2024 - Dec 10, 2025
#5-24.11%
Feb 15, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017
-22.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Jun 4, 2001
#6-23.95%
Nov 15, 2022 - Oct 12, 2023
-21.21%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026
#7-19.42%
Nov 5, 2013 - Feb 7, 2014
-19.17%
Oct 5, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000
#8-19.09%
May 4, 2026 - Jul 1, 2026
-18.71%
May 17, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021
#9-18.43%
May 21, 2018 - Oct 1, 2018
-16.96%
Aug 22, 2001 - Mar 1, 2002
#10-16.48%
Jan 23, 2018 - Mar 26, 2018
-9.67%
Oct 20, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
#11-14.97%
Mar 26, 2018 - May 8, 2018
-6.19%
Sep 11, 2000 - Sep 26, 2000
#12-14.42%
Mar 25, 2022 - May 26, 2022
-6.00%
Jan 21, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026
#13-13.50%
Feb 19, 2013 - Mar 5, 2013
-5.60%
Oct 17, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
#14-13.24%
Oct 10, 2016 - Nov 30, 2016
-5.26%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 15, 1999
#15-11.93%
Oct 18, 2023 - Feb 14, 2024
-5.25%
Jun 21, 2001 - Jul 13, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between FANG and FITB is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.85
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

FANG vs FITB dividend yield comparison.

YearFANGFITB
20261.13%1.40%
20252.66%3.29%
20245.06%3.41%
20235.15%3.94%
20226.55%3.84%
20211.62%2.62%
20203.10%3.92%
20190.74%3.06%
20180.40%3.14%
20170.00%1.98%
20160.00%1.97%
20150.00%2.59%
20140.00%2.50%
20130.00%2.23%
20120.00%2.37%
20110.00%2.20%
20100.00%0.27%
20090.00%0.41%
20080.00%9.08%
20070.00%6.76%
20060.00%3.86%
20050.00%3.87%
20040.00%2.77%
20030.00%1.91%
20020.00%1.67%
20010.00%1.35%
20000.00%1.17%
19990.00%0.33%

Select Stocks to Compare