FAD vs GXC
Comparison between FIRST TRUST MULTI CAP GROWTH ALPHADEX FUND (FAD, ETF) and STATE STREET(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) CHINA ETF (GXC, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceFAD has outperformed GXC, delivering a return of +10.5% compared to -5.0%
FAD vs GXC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FAD vs GXC - Holdings Comparison
FAD and GXC have 1 common holdings. Overlap is 0.00%
FAD's top 25 holdings weight is 15.11%. GXC's top 25 holdings weight is 45.26%.
| Rank | FAD | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC (MU) - 1.00% | TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD (n/a) - 10.60% |
| #2 | SANDISK CORP ORDINARY SHARES (SNDK) - 0.94% | n/a (n/a) - 8.18% |
| #3 | SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC (STX) - 0.81% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP CLASS H (n/a) - 3.03% |
| #4 | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC (AMD) - 0.75% | PDD HOLDINGS INC ADR (PDD) - 2.25% |
| #5 | WESTERN DIGITAL CORP (WDC) - 0.73% | n/a (n/a) - 2.21% |
| #6 | n/a (DELL) - 0.70% | XIAOMI CORP CLASS B (n/a) - 1.98% |
| #7 | MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC (MTSI) - 0.69% | MEITUAN CLASS B (n/a) - 1.68% |
| #8 | ROCKET LAB CORP (RKLB) - 0.67% | n/a (n/a) - 1.57% |
| #9 | BLOOM ENERGY CORP CLASS A (BE) - 0.67% | BANK OF CHINA LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 1.46% |
| #10 | MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC (MRVL) - 0.63% | BYD CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 1.41% |
| #11 | CIENA CORP (CIEN) - 0.58% | JD.COM INC ORDINARY SHARES CLASS A (n/a) - 1.21% |
| #12 | MKS INC (MKSI) - 0.55% | NETEASE INC ORDINARY SHARES (n/a) - 1.08% |
| #13 | CORNING INC (GLW) - 0.54% | BAIDU INC (n/a) - 0.87% |
| #14 | n/a (ASTS) - 0.54% | TRIP.COM GROUP LTD (n/a) - 0.81% |
| #15 | COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC (FIX) - 0.51% | ZIJIN MINING GROUP CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.79% |
| #16 | QUANTA SERVICES INC (PWR) - 0.51% | PETROCHINA CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.77% |
| #17 | LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC (LITE) - 0.49% | CHINA LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.68% |
| #18 | TERADYNE INC (TER) - 0.49% | n/a (n/a) - 0.66% |
| #19 | VERTIV HOLDINGS CO CLASS A (VRT) - 0.49% | AGRICULTURAL BANK OF CHINA LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.61% |
| #20 | COHERENT CORP (COHR) - 0.48% | CHINA MERCHANTS BANK CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.59% |
| #21 | CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) - 0.48% | BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.58% |
| #22 | MAXLINEAR INC (MXL) - 0.47% | KWEICHOW MOUTAI CO LTD CLASS A (n/a) - 0.57% |
| #23 | KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INC (KEYS) - 0.47% | CHINA SHENHUA ENERGY CO LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.56% |
| #24 | MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC (MPWR) - 0.46% | BEONE MEDICINES LTD ORDINARY SHARES (n/a) - 0.56% |
| #25 | GE VERNOVA INC (GEV) - 0.46% | YUM CHINA HOLDINGS INC (YUMC) - 0.55% |
| Total Holdings | 677 | 1250 |
FAD vs GXC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FAD vs GXC - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FAD | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.64% | -9.50% |
| 2025 | +16.74% | +33.32% |
| 2024 | +25.55% | +17.35% |
| 2023 | +20.72% | -12.72% |
| 2022 | -23.32% | -22.44% |
| 2021 | +22.92% | -20.17% |
| 2020 | +34.73% | +24.40% |
| 2019 | +27.81% | +23.80% |
| 2018 | -6.71% | -22.33% |
| 2017 | +24.65% | +50.45% |
| 2016 | +8.80% | +3.99% |
| 2015 | +2.91% | -5.28% |
| 2014 | +9.46% | +6.92% |
| 2013 | +35.86% | +4.82% |
| 2012 | +9.99% | +18.04% |
| 2011 | -1.93% | -18.05% |
| 2010 | +24.37% | +4.63% |
| 2009 | +30.88% | +50.80% |
| 2008 | -38.05% | -48.22% |
| 2007 | +1.78% | +70.08% |
FAD vs GXC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FAD was -54.33%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 841 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GXC was -71.97%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 1880 trading sessions.
The current FAD drawdown is -3.96%. The current GXC drawdown is -33.85%.
| Rank | FAD | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.33% Oct 10, 2007 - Feb 10, 2011 | -71.97% Oct 31, 2007 - Apr 22, 2015 |
| #2 | -37.25% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 30, 2020 | -60.23% Feb 17, 2021 - Oct 31, 2022 |
| #3 | -31.99% Nov 16, 2021 - Jul 16, 2024 | -39.71% Apr 27, 2015 - Jul 19, 2017 |
| #4 | -27.00% Sep 14, 2018 - Dec 20, 2019 | -32.96% Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 8, 2020 |
| #5 | -24.87% Jul 7, 2011 - Jan 4, 2013 | -16.82% Jul 23, 2007 - Aug 27, 2007 |
| #6 | -23.55% Dec 4, 2024 - Jul 23, 2025 | -8.76% Oct 17, 2007 - Oct 31, 2007 |
| #7 | -16.92% Jul 16, 2015 - Jul 11, 2016 | -8.06% Nov 22, 2017 - Jan 2, 2018 |
| #8 | -12.36% Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 24, 2021 | -7.84% Aug 27, 2007 - Sep 4, 2007 |
| #9 | -11.08% Jul 3, 2014 - Nov 11, 2014 | -7.45% Sep 1, 2020 - Oct 12, 2020 |
| #10 | -10.95% Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 10, 2007 | -5.86% Jul 9, 2020 - Aug 24, 2020 |
| #11 | -10.66% Jan 22, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026 | -5.75% Oct 2, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
| #12 | -9.36% Oct 27, 2025 - Dec 11, 2025 | -5.60% Jan 25, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021 |
| #13 | -9.33% Jan 26, 2018 - Mar 9, 2018 | -4.85% Apr 16, 2007 - May 7, 2007 |
| #14 | -9.04% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 7, 2011 | -4.65% May 16, 2007 - Jun 5, 2007 |
| #15 | -9.01% Jul 16, 2024 - Aug 30, 2024 | -4.58% Nov 27, 2020 - Jan 5, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between FAD and GXC is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)
FAD vs GXC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FAD | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 0.09% | 2.40% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 2.80% |
| 2023 | 0.51% | 3.70% |
| 2022 | 0.60% | 2.67% |
| 2021 | 0.09% | 1.35% |
| 2020 | 0.32% | 1.04% |
| 2019 | 0.48% | 1.60% |
| 2018 | 0.20% | 2.03% |
| 2017 | 0.22% | 1.84% |
| 2016 | 0.64% | 2.05% |
| 2015 | 0.41% | 2.85% |
| 2014 | 0.44% | 2.11% |
| 2013 | 0.31% | 2.29% |
| 2012 | 1.40% | 2.02% |
| 2011 | 0.31% | 2.09% |
| 2010 | 0.29% | 1.25% |
| 2009 | 0.15% | 0.98% |
| 2008 | 0.23% | 1.78% |
| 2007 | 0.11% | 1.39% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks