EWL vs TAGG

Comparison between ISHARES MSCI SWITZERLAND ETF (EWL, ETF) and T. ROWE PRICE QM U.S. BOND ETF (TAGG, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEWL has outperformed TAGG, delivering a return of +6.8% compared to +0.2%

EWL vs TAGG - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EWL(ETF)	TAGG(ETF)
Net Assets	$2.20B	$2.30B
Expense Ratio	0.50%	0.08%
Max Drawdown	53.10%	21.31%
Sharpe Ratio	0.94	-0.23
5Y Beta	0.50	0.03
5Y Dividends CAGR	6.25%	N/A

Net Assets

EWL

$2.20B

Winner

TAGG

$2.30B

Expense Ratio

EWL

0.50%

Winner

TAGG

0.08%

Max Drawdown

EWL

53.10%

Winner

TAGG

21.31%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

EWL

0.94

TAGG

-0.23

5Y Beta

EWL

0.50

Winner

TAGG

0.03

5Y Dividends CAGR

EWL

6.25%

TAGG

N/A

EWL vs TAGG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EWL	TAGG
1 month	+3.45%	+0.49%
3 months	+4.35%	+0.33%
6 months	+0.84%	-1.50%
1 year	+18.91%	+2.59%
5 years(CAGR)	+6.84%	+0.19%
10 years(CAGR)	+9.90%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+7.16%	+0.19%

Winner

EWL

+3.45%

TAGG

+0.49%

Winner

EWL

+4.35%

TAGG

+0.33%

Winner

EWL

+0.84%

TAGG

-1.50%

Winner

EWL

+18.91%

TAGG

+2.59%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

EWL

+6.84%

TAGG

+0.19%

10Y(CAGR)

EWL

+9.90%

TAGG

N/A

Max(CAGR)

Winner

EWL

+7.16%

TAGG

+0.19%

EWL vs TAGG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EWL	TAGG
2026	+8.33%	+0.01%
2025	+33.26%	+7.35%
2024	-2.14%	+2.10%
2023	+15.91%	+5.30%
2022	-19.12%	-12.04%
2021	+18.89%	+0.01%
2020	+10.91%	N/A
2019	+32.59%	N/A
2018	-9.55%	N/A
2017	+22.90%	N/A
2016	-1.39%	N/A
2015	+0.80%	N/A
2014	+0.65%	N/A
2013	+23.71%	N/A
2012	+19.11%	N/A
2011	-8.12%	N/A
2010	+12.08%	N/A
2009	+22.40%	N/A
2008	-27.27%	N/A
2007	+5.13%	N/A
2006	+25.35%	N/A
2005	+13.03%	N/A
2004	+16.89%	N/A
2003	+31.86%	N/A
2002	-12.22%	N/A
2001	-25.68%	N/A
2000	+3.23%	N/A
1999	+1.59%	N/A

EWL vs TAGG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EWL was -51.63%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 844 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for TAGG was -17.27%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. Recovery took 987 trading sessions.

The current EWL drawdown is -0.42%. The current TAGG drawdown is -2.17%.

Rank	EWL	TAGG
#1	-51.63% Dec 10, 2007 - Apr 15, 2011	-17.27% Nov 9, 2021 - Oct 16, 2025
#2	-46.82% Jan 3, 2001 - Feb 24, 2005	-3.19% Feb 27, 2026 - May 19, 2026
#3	-28.96% Dec 29, 2021 - Jul 17, 2024	-1.08% Oct 27, 2025 - Nov 26, 2025
#4	-27.80% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 22, 2020	-1.01% Oct 1, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021
#5	-25.45% May 31, 2011 - Jan 2, 2013	-0.88% Nov 26, 2025 - Jan 14, 2026
#6	-21.39% May 14, 2015 - May 5, 2017	-0.62% Jan 14, 2026 - Feb 5, 2026
#7	-17.35% Jan 26, 2018 - Jun 6, 2019	-0.21% Nov 5, 2021 - Nov 9, 2021
#8	-15.45% Jan 7, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000	-0.19% Oct 22, 2025 - Oct 27, 2025
#9	-14.93% May 10, 2006 - Sep 26, 2006	-0.17% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 12, 2026
#10	-13.48% Feb 27, 2026 - Jul 2, 2026	-0.15% Feb 17, 2026 - Feb 23, 2026
#11	-13.47% Aug 30, 2024 - Mar 5, 2025	-0.14% Feb 6, 2026 - Feb 10, 2026
#12	-13.17% Jun 10, 2014 - Apr 15, 2015	-0.07% Feb 23, 2026 - Feb 26, 2026
#13	-12.12% Mar 7, 2025 - Apr 28, 2025	-0.07% Oct 16, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025
#14	-11.10% Apr 25, 2007 - Oct 31, 2007	N/A
#15	-9.31% May 8, 2013 - Aug 6, 2013	N/A

Correlation

Correlation between EWL and TAGG is 0.83 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.83

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

EWL vs TAGG dividend yield comparison.

Year	EWL	TAGG
2026	1.70%	2.59%
2025	1.71%	4.36%
2024	2.21%	4.36%
2023	2.12%	3.48%
2022	2.04%	3.67%
2021	1.74%	0.33%
2020	1.45%	0.00%
2019	1.85%	0.00%
2018	2.56%	0.00%
2017	2.05%	0.00%
2016	2.75%	0.00%
2015	2.58%	0.00%
2014	2.49%	0.00%
2013	1.83%	0.00%
2012	2.36%	0.00%
2011	2.43%	0.00%
2010	1.29%	0.00%
2009	1.36%	0.00%
2008	2.48%	0.00%
2007	1.06%	0.00%
2006	0.78%	0.00%
2005	0.62%	0.00%
2004	0.50%	0.00%
2003	0.36%	0.00%
2002	0.26%	0.00%
2001	0.79%	0.00%
2000	0.94%	0.00%