ETO vs FTMH
Comparison between Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETO, ETF) and Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH, ETF).
ETO vs FTMH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
ETO
$564M
Winner
FTMH
$566M
Expense Ratio
ETO
N/A
FTMH
0.35%
Max Drawdown
ETO
75.20%
Winner
FTMH
3.46%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
ETO
1.23
FTMH
-0.17
5Y Beta
ETO
0.84
Winner
FTMH
0.13
5Y Dividends CAGR
ETO
5.67%
FTMH
N/A
ETO vs FTMH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
ETO
+6.20%
FTMH
-0.03%
3M
Winner
ETO
+6.12%
FTMH
+0.06%
6M
Winner
ETO
+7.62%
FTMH
-0.14%
1Y
Winner
ETO
+24.29%
FTMH
+2.53%
5Y(CAGR)
ETO
+7.68%
FTMH
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
ETO
+12.32%
FTMH
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
ETO
+10.69%
FTMH
+3.07%
ETO vs FTMH - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ETO | FTMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +12.44% | +2.15% |
| 2025 | +30.49% | +0.11% |
| 2024 | +16.89% | N/A |
| 2023 | +21.38% | N/A |
| 2022 | -30.30% | N/A |
| 2021 | +38.76% | N/A |
| 2020 | +5.60% | N/A |
| 2019 | +48.13% | N/A |
| 2018 | -18.67% | N/A |
| 2017 | +33.20% | N/A |
| 2016 | +9.91% | N/A |
| 2015 | -3.13% | N/A |
| 2014 | +13.76% | N/A |
| 2013 | +30.52% | N/A |
| 2012 | +24.01% | N/A |
| 2011 | -12.34% | N/A |
| 2010 | +11.90% | N/A |
| 2009 | +40.57% | N/A |
| 2008 | -52.19% | N/A |
| 2007 | +19.59% | N/A |
| 2006 | +33.45% | N/A |
| 2005 | +31.87% | N/A |
| 2004 | +6.89% | N/A |
ETO vs FTMH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ETO was -71.95%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1384 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FTMH was -3.11%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. Recovery took 62 trading sessions.
The current ETO drawdown is -1.18%. The current FTMH drawdown is -2.23%.
| Rank | ETO | FTMH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -71.95% Oct 31, 2007 - May 2, 2013 | -3.11% Feb 27, 2026 - May 28, 2026 |
| #2 | -51.93% Feb 20, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 | -2.51% Jul 2, 2026 - Aug 24, 2026 |
| #3 | -35.40% Nov 11, 2021 - Dec 4, 2024 | -0.89% Nov 28, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026 |
| #4 | -29.75% Aug 28, 2018 - Mar 21, 2019 | -0.56% Jan 9, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026 |
| #5 | -24.20% Apr 22, 2015 - Aug 23, 2016 | -0.56% Nov 11, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 |
| #6 | -23.75% Jul 12, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 | -0.39% Oct 27, 2025 - Nov 11, 2025 |
| #7 | -18.24% Feb 20, 2025 - May 13, 2025 | -0.34% Jun 4, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026 |
| #8 | -16.44% May 21, 2013 - Nov 15, 2013 | -0.13% Jan 7, 2026 - Jan 9, 2026 |
| #9 | -15.27% Feb 25, 2026 - May 6, 2026 | -0.09% Feb 13, 2026 - Feb 19, 2026 |
| #10 | -14.73% Jun 1, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 | -0.08% Jun 18, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 |
| #11 | -13.96% Jul 23, 2014 - Nov 6, 2014 | -0.05% Jun 29, 2026 - Jul 2, 2026 |
| #12 | -13.70% May 10, 2006 - Aug 9, 2006 | -0.00% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026 |
| #13 | -11.74% Dec 29, 2006 - Apr 3, 2007 | N/A |
| #14 | -11.38% Jan 24, 2018 - Aug 7, 2018 | N/A |
| #15 | -11.20% Sep 13, 2021 - Nov 11, 2021 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between ETO and FTMH is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.73
-101
Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)
ETO vs FTMH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ETO | FTMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.37% | 2.72% |
| 2025 | 6.85% | 0.86% |
| 2024 | 7.81% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 6.97% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 9.87% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 5.82% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 7.36% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 8.32% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 11.51% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 8.50% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 9.51% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 9.29% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 12.51% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 8.49% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 6.48% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 7.55% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 6.26% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 6.62% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 14.74% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 5.66% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.82% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.16% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 4.31% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: ETO vs SPYFTMH vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks