StockComparison Logo
vs

ETN vs QCOM

Comparison between Eaton Corporation plc (ETN, Company) and Qualcomm Inc (QCOM, Company).

ETN is from the Industrials sector, while QCOM is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceETN has outperformed QCOM, delivering a return of +22.0% compared to +4.7%

ETN vs QCOM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
ETN
$179B
QCOM
$172B
Max Drawdown
Winner
ETN
70.48%
QCOM
86.75%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
ETN
0.62
QCOM
0.29
5Y Beta
Winner
ETN
1.49
QCOM
1.63
Industry
ETN
Specialty Industrial Machinery
QCOM
Semiconductors
P/E Ratio
ETN
46.65
Winner
QCOM
18.64
Forward P/E
ETN
31.55
Winner
QCOM
15.87
PEG Ratio
ETN
3.20
Winner
QCOM
0.70
Dividend Yield
ETN
1.01%
Winner
QCOM
2.22%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
ETN
12.54%
QCOM
11.24%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
ETN
15.82%
QCOM
1.46%
Debt to Equity
ETN
101.76%
Winner
QCOM
53.41%
Free Cash Flow Yield
ETN
2.20%
Winner
QCOM
7.19%
P/S Ratio
ETN
5.84
Winner
QCOM
3.95
P/B Ratio
ETN
8.53
Winner
QCOM
6.16

ETN vs QCOM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
ETN
+4.29%
QCOM
-7.35%
3M
Winner
ETN
+10.15%
QCOM
-24.39%
6M
ETN
+13.20%
Winner
QCOM
+13.67%
1Y
Winner
ETN
+22.71%
QCOM
+6.50%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
ETN
+22.01%
QCOM
+4.73%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
ETN
+22.76%
QCOM
+12.88%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
ETN
+15.25%
QCOM
+8.68%

ETN vs QCOM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearETNQCOM
2026+29.13%-6.11%
2025-2.81%+13.82%
2024+40.64%+11.73%
2023+55.40%+38.52%
2022-4.90%-39.71%
2021+48.41%+25.44%
2020+28.40%+76.09%
2019+42.90%+59.30%
2018-9.93%-9.26%
2017+19.01%+1.72%
2016+33.38%+34.75%
2015-20.71%-30.59%
2014-7.46%+3.55%
2013+38.36%+16.90%
2012+23.06%+13.71%
2011-13.62%+10.71%
2010+62.38%+7.44%
2009+27.80%+26.87%
2008-45.34%-5.33%
2007+31.45%+6.45%
2006+14.15%-13.17%
2005-3.81%+2.69%
2004+37.99%+59.11%
2003+38.00%+46.12%
2002+7.39%-30.07%
2001+13.34%-28.75%
2000+7.94%-54.16%
1999-0.58%+212.79%

ETN vs QCOM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for ETN was -68.97%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 830 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for QCOM was -86.75%, occurring on Aug 5, 2002. Recovery took 3572 trading sessions.

The current ETN drawdown is -8.86%. The current QCOM drawdown is -35.72%.

RankETNQCOM
#1-68.97%
Jul 23, 2007 - Nov 4, 2010
-86.75%
Jan 3, 2000 - Mar 18, 2014
#2-44.50%
Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 28, 2020
-45.08%
Jul 23, 2014 - Sep 5, 2018
#3-38.34%
Feb 11, 2011 - Dec 18, 2012
-44.29%
Dec 15, 2021 - May 2, 2024
#4-37.52%
Jul 16, 2014 - Mar 1, 2017
-44.23%
Jun 18, 2024 - May 8, 2026
#5-34.46%
Dec 4, 2024 - Jul 17, 2025
-40.97%
May 29, 2026 - Jul 31, 2026
#6-31.65%
Apr 16, 2002 - Jul 23, 2003
-36.01%
Jan 17, 2020 - Jul 30, 2020
#7-29.63%
Apr 26, 2000 - Feb 25, 2002
-33.50%
Sep 14, 2018 - Apr 17, 2019
#8-27.29%
Nov 9, 2021 - Feb 10, 2023
-26.79%
May 3, 2019 - Nov 7, 2019
#9-26.06%
Sep 21, 2018 - Sep 10, 2019
-24.86%
Feb 2, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021
#10-22.62%
Nov 16, 1999 - Mar 16, 2000
-17.65%
May 11, 2026 - May 22, 2026
#11-20.53%
Dec 31, 2004 - Feb 24, 2006
-14.30%
Nov 8, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020
#12-19.78%
May 24, 2024 - Oct 11, 2024
-10.89%
Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 9, 2020
#13-19.66%
May 11, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006
-9.29%
Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 26, 1999
#14-19.14%
Jul 28, 2025 - Feb 11, 2026
-9.14%
Dec 8, 2020 - Jan 14, 2021
#15-18.51%
Sep 11, 2023 - Dec 14, 2023
-6.73%
Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 2, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between ETN and QCOM is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.92
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

ETN vs QCOM dividend yield comparison.

YearETNQCOM
20260.79%1.13%
20251.31%2.06%
20241.13%2.18%
20231.43%2.18%
20222.06%2.67%
20211.76%1.47%
20201.88%1.69%
20193.00%2.81%
20183.85%4.27%
20173.04%3.50%
20163.40%3.17%
20154.23%3.72%
20142.88%2.17%
20132.21%1.75%
20122.81%1.56%
20113.12%1.53%
20102.13%1.50%
20093.14%1.45%
20084.02%1.73%
20071.77%1.37%
20061.97%1.19%
20051.85%0.79%
20041.31%0.53%
20031.70%0.45%
20022.25%0.00%
20012.37%0.00%
20002.34%0.00%
19990.61%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare