ETG vs CGNG
Comparison between Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund (ETG, ETF) and CAPITAL GROUP NEW GEOGRAPHY EQUITY ETF SHARE CLASS (CGNG, ETF).
ETG vs CGNG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
ETG
$1.70B
Winner
CGNG
$1.80B
Expense Ratio
ETG
N/A
CGNG
0.64%
Max Drawdown
ETG
78.34%
Winner
CGNG
16.13%
Sharpe Ratio
ETG
1.50
Winner
CGNG
1.85
5Y Beta
ETG
0.92
Winner
CGNG
0.86
5Y Dividends CAGR
ETG
6.45%
CGNG
N/A
ETG vs CGNG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
ETG
+9.70%
CGNG
+8.64%
3M
ETG
+0.56%
Winner
CGNG
+5.77%
6M
ETG
+9.55%
Winner
CGNG
+16.72%
1Y
ETG
+28.41%
Winner
CGNG
+40.27%
5Y(CAGR)
ETG
+10.53%
CGNG
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
ETG
+13.28%
CGNG
N/A
Max(CAGR)
ETG
+8.77%
Winner
CGNG
+22.86%
ETG vs CGNG - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ETG | CGNG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.09% | +11.88% |
| 2025 | +36.72% | +29.31% |
| 2024 | +17.24% | -0.97% |
| 2023 | +21.74% | N/A |
| 2022 | -27.67% | N/A |
| 2021 | +35.89% | N/A |
| 2020 | +9.86% | N/A |
| 2019 | +40.82% | N/A |
| 2018 | -15.13% | N/A |
| 2017 | +30.28% | N/A |
| 2016 | +0.10% | N/A |
| 2015 | +3.39% | N/A |
| 2014 | +3.25% | N/A |
| 2013 | +30.36% | N/A |
| 2012 | +18.06% | N/A |
| 2011 | -7.33% | N/A |
| 2010 | +10.83% | N/A |
| 2009 | +36.82% | N/A |
| 2008 | -54.78% | N/A |
| 2007 | +10.23% | N/A |
| 2006 | +33.94% | N/A |
| 2005 | +11.43% | N/A |
| 2004 | +5.75% | N/A |
ETG vs CGNG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ETG was -74.70%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1624 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CGNG was -15.90%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 148 trading sessions.
The current ETG drawdown is -0.76%.
| Rank | ETG | CGNG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -74.70% Jul 13, 2007 - Dec 23, 2013 | -15.90% Oct 7, 2024 - May 12, 2025 |
| #2 | -51.49% Feb 20, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 | -13.75% Feb 25, 2026 - May 5, 2026 |
| #3 | -31.58% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 27, 2024 | -8.64% Jul 12, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024 |
| #4 | -29.50% Sep 21, 2018 - Oct 24, 2019 | -5.06% Oct 29, 2025 - Dec 24, 2025 |
| #5 | -24.65% Jun 2, 2015 - Mar 1, 2017 | -3.69% Oct 8, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 |
| #6 | -20.78% Feb 6, 2004 - Nov 23, 2004 | -3.32% Jan 28, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 |
| #7 | -16.96% Feb 19, 2025 - May 2, 2025 | -3.01% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 12, 2025 |
| #8 | -16.65% Feb 2, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 | -2.41% Jun 11, 2025 - Jun 24, 2025 |
| #9 | -13.58% Jul 7, 2014 - Mar 24, 2015 | -2.06% Jan 12, 2026 - Jan 23, 2026 |
| #10 | -10.28% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024 | -1.53% Feb 11, 2026 - Feb 20, 2026 |
| #11 | -10.10% Jan 23, 2018 - Jul 24, 2018 | -1.52% Aug 28, 2025 - Sep 5, 2025 |
| #12 | -9.98% Dec 20, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007 | -1.39% Aug 13, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025 |
| #13 | -6.88% Sep 12, 2005 - Nov 3, 2005 | -1.30% Oct 20, 2025 - Oct 27, 2025 |
| #14 | -6.87% Jun 4, 2007 - Jul 13, 2007 | -1.29% May 6, 2026 - May 7, 2026 |
| #15 | -6.71% Jan 22, 2014 - Feb 21, 2014 | -1.21% Sep 23, 2025 - Oct 1, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between ETG and CGNG is 0.97 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
0.97
-101
Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)
ETG vs CGNG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ETG | CGNG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.25% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 6.72% | 0.68% |
| 2024 | 8.03% | 0.27% |
| 2023 | 7.02% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 9.94% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 6.02% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 6.74% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 6.83% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 9.08% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 7.69% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 8.74% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 7.93% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 7.61% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 6.66% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 8.30% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 9.23% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 7.99% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 8.21% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 15.86% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 5.72% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.22% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.36% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.23% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: ETG vs SPYCGNG vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks