StockComparison Logo
vs

ETD vs CLB

Comparison between Ethan Allen Interiors Inc (ETD, Company) and Core Laboratories Inc (CLB, Company).

ETD is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CLB is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceETD has outperformed CLB, delivering a return of +2.9% compared to -22.2%

ETD vs CLB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
ETD
$539M
CLB
$538M
Max Drawdown
Winner
ETD
84.68%
CLB
96.31%
Sharpe Ratio
ETD
-0.53
Winner
CLB
0.09
5Y Beta
Winner
ETD
0.81
CLB
1.23
Industry
ETD
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
CLB
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
ETD
13.33
CLB
18.62
Forward P/E
Winner
ETD
10.50
CLB
19.76
PEG Ratio
ETD
N/A
CLB
3.70
Dividend Yield
Winner
ETD
7.40%
CLB
0.33%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
ETD
5.17%
CLB
0.00%
5Y EPS CAGR
ETD
6.08%
CLB
N/A
Debt to Equity
Winner
ETD
0.00%
CLB
42.57%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
ETD
8.30%
CLB
4.17%

ETD vs CLB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
ETD
+9.69%
CLB
-13.79%
3M
Winner
ETD
-2.69%
CLB
-27.16%
6M
Winner
ETD
-8.65%
CLB
-27.12%
1Y
ETD
-16.28%
Winner
CLB
-6.81%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
ETD
+2.91%
CLB
-22.16%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
ETD
+1.95%
CLB
-20.12%
Max(CAGR)
ETD
+1.73%
Winner
CLB
+1.76%

ETD vs CLB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearETDCLB
2026-3.90%-30.94%
2025-12.45%-11.95%
2024-5.25%-0.80%
2023+28.78%-7.33%
2022+6.82%-16.88%
2021+43.20%-19.29%
2020+14.00%-30.42%
2019+16.91%-34.57%
2018-35.99%-45.70%
2017-21.35%-8.10%
2016+39.59%+14.09%
2015-7.75%-7.01%
2014+4.79%-35.33%
2013+14.53%+71.69%
2012+8.46%-4.52%
2011+15.40%+28.72%
2010+47.76%+47.40%
2009-4.93%+85.09%
2008-46.89%-51.75%
2007-19.19%+60.64%
2006-1.36%+109.84%
2005-5.38%+63.64%
2004+6.65%+38.66%
2003+18.13%+44.75%
2002-15.03%-21.72%
2001+35.34%-45.55%
2000+11.63%+41.87%
1999-8.08%+9.59%

ETD vs CLB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for ETD was -82.92%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2675 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLB was -95.78%, occurring on Mar 17, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current ETD drawdown is -28.51%. The current CLB drawdown is -93.74%.

RankETDCLB
#1-82.92%
Apr 26, 2006 - Dec 8, 2016
-95.78%
Apr 21, 2014 - Mar 17, 2020
#2-73.68%
Dec 20, 2016 - Apr 28, 2021
-74.19%
Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 29, 2005
#3-41.16%
Nov 16, 1999 - Jan 31, 2001
-65.25%
Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 22, 2010
#4-36.92%
Mar 28, 2024 - May 13, 2026
-31.21%
May 2, 2012 - Apr 22, 2013
#5-35.40%
Jan 4, 2002 - Jan 14, 2004
-29.26%
May 5, 2006 - Jul 27, 2006
#6-31.16%
Nov 12, 2004 - Jan 26, 2006
-27.02%
Sep 5, 2006 - Nov 14, 2006
#7-31.15%
Feb 2, 2001 - Nov 14, 2001
-26.37%
Jul 15, 2011 - Dec 1, 2011
#8-30.59%
May 10, 2021 - Nov 8, 2022
-20.07%
Dec 8, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007
#9-26.54%
Aug 3, 2023 - Mar 27, 2024
-18.95%
Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000
#10-20.97%
Mar 5, 2004 - Nov 12, 2004
-15.49%
Sep 7, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005
#11-15.96%
Feb 3, 2023 - Jul 18, 2023
-15.11%
Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 18, 2010
#12-12.89%
Nov 15, 2022 - Jan 12, 2023
-14.26%
Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000
#13-10.53%
Jan 12, 2023 - Feb 2, 2023
-13.63%
Oct 18, 2010 - Dec 7, 2010
#14-8.83%
Apr 28, 2021 - May 7, 2021
-13.09%
Apr 4, 2011 - Jun 20, 2011
#15-8.19%
Jan 31, 2006 - Mar 27, 2006
-11.32%
Aug 10, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007

Correlation

Correlation between ETD and CLB is -0.20 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.20
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

ETD vs CLB dividend yield comparison.

YearETDCLB
20263.68%0.17%
20257.92%0.25%
20246.87%0.23%
20235.95%0.23%
20226.62%0.20%
202110.61%0.18%
20203.12%1.06%
20199.34%5.84%
20186.08%3.69%
20172.66%2.01%
20161.76%1.83%
20151.87%2.02%
20141.36%1.66%
20131.22%0.67%
20121.24%1.02%
20111.01%0.88%
20101.00%1.00%
20093.35%0.97%
20086.33%2.67%
20072.88%0.00%
20062.05%0.00%
20051.72%0.00%
20048.62%0.00%
20030.69%0.00%
20020.58%0.00%
20010.38%0.00%
20000.48%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare