ET vs MFC
Comparison between Energy Transfer LP (ET, Company) and Manulife Financial Corp (MFC, Company).
ET is from the Energy sector, while MFC is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceET has outperformed MFC, delivering a return of +28.4% compared to +22.7%
ET vs MFC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ET vs MFC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ET vs MFC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ET | MFC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +34.62% | +20.56% |
| 2025 | -9.92% | +23.70% |
| 2024 | +53.00% | +47.50% |
| 2023 | +30.64% | +31.27% |
| 2022 | +47.20% | -2.84% |
| 2021 | +44.83% | +13.95% |
| 2020 | -46.91% | -8.34% |
| 2019 | +5.67% | +47.86% |
| 2018 | -20.06% | -29.85% |
| 2017 | -4.07% | +21.43% |
| 2016 | +51.16% | +28.19% |
| 2015 | -51.29% | -17.05% |
| 2014 | +45.35% | +1.34% |
| 2013 | +79.14% | +46.77% |
| 2012 | +18.95% | +28.37% |
| 2011 | +10.26% | -36.60% |
| 2010 | +33.30% | -7.17% |
| 2009 | +97.73% | +13.83% |
| 2008 | -50.58% | -55.82% |
| 2007 | +17.31% | +23.72% |
| 2006 | +41.76% | +15.23% |
| 2005 | N/A | +33.02% |
| 2004 | N/A | +45.93% |
| 2003 | N/A | +47.82% |
| 2002 | N/A | -13.20% |
| 2001 | N/A | -12.30% |
| 2000 | N/A | +168.00% |
| 1999 | N/A | +5.75% |
ET vs MFC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ET was -87.82%, occurring on Feb 8, 2016. Recovery took 2309 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MFC was -83.60%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 4100 trading sessions.
The current ET drawdown is -1.07%. The current MFC drawdown is -4.26%.
| Rank | ET | MFC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -87.82% Jun 15, 2015 - Aug 16, 2024 | -83.60% Oct 31, 2007 - Feb 15, 2024 |
| #2 | -66.17% Jul 6, 2007 - Jul 12, 2010 | -42.36% Aug 7, 2001 - Aug 11, 2003 |
| #3 | -29.34% Jun 21, 2011 - Feb 24, 2012 | -24.83% Nov 15, 1999 - Mar 31, 2000 |
| #4 | -25.04% Sep 10, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014 | -22.34% Dec 28, 2000 - Aug 7, 2001 |
| #5 | -24.55% Jan 30, 2025 - Mar 26, 2026 | -16.75% Apr 2, 2025 - Jun 5, 2025 |
| #6 | -22.07% Nov 18, 2014 - Feb 25, 2015 | -12.49% Jan 29, 2026 - Apr 15, 2026 |
| #7 | -21.10% Mar 19, 2012 - Aug 17, 2012 | -12.18% Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 2, 2025 |
| #8 | -12.67% Apr 27, 2011 - Jun 16, 2011 | -11.25% Jul 11, 2024 - Aug 23, 2024 |
| #9 | -11.31% May 21, 2013 - Jul 9, 2013 | -10.59% Apr 12, 2004 - Jun 22, 2004 |
| #10 | -9.04% Jul 25, 2014 - Aug 27, 2014 | -10.54% Oct 31, 2000 - Nov 30, 2000 |
| #11 | -8.36% Nov 29, 2024 - Jan 14, 2025 | -10.52% Sep 23, 2003 - Nov 28, 2003 |
| #12 | -8.04% May 19, 2026 - Jul 23, 2026 | -9.13% Oct 9, 2000 - Oct 25, 2000 |
| #13 | -7.96% Nov 9, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 | -8.84% Mar 28, 2024 - May 9, 2024 |
| #14 | -7.09% Dec 11, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013 | -8.81% Jun 21, 2000 - Aug 14, 2000 |
| #15 | -7.09% May 10, 2006 - Sep 1, 2006 | -8.77% Aug 8, 2007 - Aug 31, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between ET and MFC is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
ET vs MFC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ET | MFC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4.78% | 2.49% |
| 2025 | 7.97% | 3.45% |
| 2024 | 6.51% | 4.16% |
| 2023 | 8.95% | 4.86% |
| 2022 | 7.33% | 5.71% |
| 2021 | 7.41% | 4.91% |
| 2020 | 17.27% | 4.70% |
| 2019 | 9.51% | 3.71% |
| 2018 | 9.24% | 4.08% |
| 2017 | 6.66% | 3.93% |
| 2016 | 5.90% | 4.15% |
| 2015 | 7.42% | 5.38% |
| 2014 | 2.61% | 2.99% |
| 2013 | 3.19% | 2.64% |
| 2012 | 5.50% | 3.83% |
| 2011 | 5.79% | 4.90% |
| 2010 | 5.53% | 3.03% |
| 2009 | 6.89% | 5.51% |
| 2008 | 12.03% | 5.87% |
| 2007 | 4.14% | 2.16% |
| 2006 | 1.94% | 2.15% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.97% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.03% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.41% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.76% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 1.84% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.08% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks