EPAM vs TPC

Comparison between EPAM Systems Inc (EPAM, Company) and Tutor Perini Corp (TPC, Company).

EPAM is from the Technology sector, while TPC is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceTPC has outperformed EPAM, delivering a return of +45.5% compared to -31.2%

EPAM vs TPC - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EPAM(COMPANY)	TPC(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$4.57B	$4.58B
Max Drawdown	89.40%	96.06%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.25	1.40
5Y Beta	1.02	1.78
Industry	Information Technology Services	Engineering & Construction
P/E Ratio	12.21	58.70
Forward P/E	6.80	14.01
PEG Ratio	0.46	0.62
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.14%
5Y EPS CAGR	2.57%	-6.78%
Debt to Equity	4.81%	32.86%
Free Cash Flow Yield	11.89%	15.36%
P/S Ratio	0.81	0.82
P/B Ratio	1.36	3.76

Market Cap

EPAM

$4.57B

Winner

TPC

$4.58B

Max Drawdown

Winner

EPAM

89.40%

TPC

96.06%

Sharpe Ratio

EPAM

-1.25

Winner

TPC

1.40

5Y Beta

Winner

EPAM

1.02

TPC

1.78

Industry

EPAM

Information Technology Services

TPC

Engineering & Construction

P/E Ratio

Winner

EPAM

12.21

TPC

58.70

Forward P/E

Winner

EPAM

6.80

TPC

14.01

PEG Ratio

Winner

EPAM

0.46

TPC

0.62

Dividend Yield

EPAM

N/A

TPC

0.14%

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

EPAM

2.57%

TPC

-6.78%

Debt to Equity

Winner

EPAM

4.81%

TPC

32.86%

Free Cash Flow Yield

EPAM

11.89%

Winner

TPC

15.36%

P/S Ratio

Winner

EPAM

0.81

TPC

0.82

P/B Ratio

Winner

EPAM

1.36

TPC

3.76

EPAM vs TPC - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EPAM	TPC
1 month	+12.03%	+8.22%
3 months	-28.67%	+1.45%
6 months	-60.52%	+15.52%
1 year	-49.64%	+78.73%
5 years(CAGR)	-31.17%	+45.54%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.05%	+13.59%
Max(CAGR)	+13.40%	+12.57%

Winner

EPAM

+12.03%

TPC

+8.22%

EPAM

-28.67%

Winner

TPC

+1.45%

EPAM

-60.52%

Winner

TPC

+15.52%

EPAM

-49.64%

Winner

TPC

+78.73%

5Y(CAGR)

EPAM

-31.17%

Winner

TPC

+45.54%

10Y(CAGR)

EPAM

+2.05%

Winner

TPC

+13.59%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

EPAM

+13.40%

TPC

+12.57%

EPAM vs TPC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EPAM	TPC
2026	-57.03%	+26.61%
2025	-10.60%	+177.64%
2024	-19.71%	+167.70%
2023	-10.28%	+20.53%
2022	-48.97%	-39.65%
2021	+92.05%	-3.21%
2020	+65.67%	+5.54%
2019	+85.58%	-20.02%
2018	+7.02%	-37.13%
2017	+68.76%	-10.74%
2016	-14.40%	+70.94%
2015	+69.18%	-29.99%
2014	+37.29%	-4.64%
2013	+84.09%	+86.13%
2012	+29.29%	+7.37%
2011	N/A	-43.34%
2010	N/A	+20.01%
2009	N/A	-24.79%
2008	N/A	-43.39%
2007	N/A	+35.67%
2006	N/A	+22.09%
2005	N/A	+44.52%
2004	N/A	+75.68%
2003	N/A	+105.62%
2002	N/A	-36.12%
2001	N/A	+133.33%
2000	N/A	-22.58%
1999	N/A	+0.00%

EPAM vs TPC Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EPAM was -89.40%, occurring on Jun 22, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for TPC was -95.89%, occurring on Mar 17, 2020. Recovery took 4643 trading sessions.

The current EPAM drawdown is -87.99%. The current TPC drawdown is -9.84%.

Rank	EPAM	TPC
#1	-89.40% Nov 8, 2021 - Jun 22, 2026	-95.89% Jul 23, 2007 - Jan 5, 2026
#2	-39.27% Apr 12, 2012 - Mar 6, 2013	-68.50% Jun 29, 2001 - Jan 13, 2004
#3	-33.28% Feb 19, 2020 - Jun 17, 2020	-53.46% Mar 18, 2004 - Oct 31, 2005
#4	-32.29% Feb 18, 2014 - Jun 6, 2014	-52.69% Jan 6, 2000 - Mar 9, 2001
#5	-30.91% Dec 8, 2015 - May 22, 2017	-36.45% Apr 5, 2006 - Nov 10, 2006
#6	-26.19% Aug 30, 2018 - Feb 1, 2019	-29.32% May 5, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#7	-18.35% Jun 9, 2014 - Oct 27, 2014	-24.13% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
#8	-16.54% Oct 14, 2013 - Jan 21, 2014	-15.62% May 22, 2001 - Jun 29, 2001
#9	-15.35% Jul 26, 2019 - Nov 13, 2019	-14.05% Nov 2, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000
#10	-15.28% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 5, 2021	-13.79% Mar 30, 2001 - May 1, 2001
#11	-12.59% Dec 9, 2014 - Feb 12, 2015	-13.60% Mar 9, 2001 - Mar 29, 2001
#12	-12.33% Sep 3, 2021 - Oct 22, 2021	-13.58% Dec 7, 2006 - Feb 16, 2007
#13	-11.89% Jan 26, 2018 - Mar 9, 2018	-12.83% Nov 22, 2005 - Jan 24, 2006
#14	-11.87% Oct 16, 2020 - Dec 22, 2020	-12.67% Feb 11, 2004 - Mar 15, 2004
#15	-11.84% Oct 9, 2015 - Dec 7, 2015	-11.31% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 5, 2007