EOD vs ACLC

Comparison between Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD, ETF) and AMERICAN CENTURY LARGE CAP EQUITY ETF (ACLC, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEOD has outperformed ACLC, delivering a return of +12.6% compared to +10.5%

EOD vs ACLC - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EOD(ETF)	ACLC(ETF)
Net Assets	$307M	$308M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.39%
Max Drawdown	85.56%	27.06%
Sharpe Ratio	1.72	1.11
5Y Beta	0.79	0.97
P/E Ratio	N/A	27.78
Forward P/E	N/A	22.16
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.65
5Y Dividends CAGR	-0.07%	15.27%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	26.13%
P/S Ratio	N/A	3.46
P/B Ratio	N/A	6.45

Net Assets

EOD

$307M

Winner

ACLC

$308M

Expense Ratio

EOD

N/A

ACLC

0.39%

Max Drawdown

EOD

85.56%

Winner

ACLC

27.06%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

EOD

1.72

ACLC

1.11

5Y Beta

Winner

EOD

0.79

ACLC

0.97

P/E Ratio

EOD

N/A

ACLC

27.78

Forward P/E

EOD

N/A

ACLC

22.16

PEG Ratio

EOD

N/A

ACLC

0.65

5Y Dividends CAGR

EOD

-0.07%

Winner

ACLC

15.27%

5Y EPS CAGR

EOD

N/A

ACLC

26.13%

P/S Ratio

EOD

N/A

ACLC

3.46

P/B Ratio

EOD

N/A

ACLC

6.45

EOD vs ACLC - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EOD	ACLC
1 month	+3.66%	+0.73%
3 months	+10.61%	+9.40%
6 months	+17.06%	+7.98%
1 year	+35.25%	+19.95%
5 years(CAGR)	+12.61%	+10.50%
10 years(CAGR)	+11.78%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+5.48%	+13.99%

Winner

EOD

+3.66%

ACLC

+0.73%

Winner

EOD

+10.61%

ACLC

+9.40%

Winner

EOD

+17.06%

ACLC

+7.98%

Winner

EOD

+35.25%

ACLC

+19.95%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

EOD

+12.61%

ACLC

+10.50%

10Y(CAGR)

EOD

+11.78%

ACLC

N/A

Max(CAGR)

EOD

+5.48%

Winner

ACLC

+13.99%

EOD vs ACLC - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EOD	ACLC
2026	+15.26%	+6.18%
2025	+33.04%	+12.01%
2024	+26.10%	+20.66%
2023	+6.80%	+25.20%
2022	-17.97%	-19.61%
2021	+33.42%	+30.85%
2020	-2.48%	+17.32%
2019	+31.67%	N/A
2018	-12.65%	N/A
2017	+17.49%	N/A
2016	+2.32%	N/A
2015	-11.39%	N/A
2014	+14.11%	N/A
2013	+4.68%	N/A
2012	+10.68%	N/A
2011	-10.54%	N/A
2010	+2.93%	N/A
2009	+19.07%	N/A
2008	-35.66%	N/A
2007	-5.38%	N/A

EOD vs ACLC Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EOD was -56.78%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1759 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ACLC was -26.44%, occurring on Sep 30, 2022. Recovery took 500 trading sessions.

The current EOD drawdown is -1.74%. The current ACLC drawdown is -2.79%.

Rank	EOD	ACLC
#1	-56.78% Jun 4, 2007 - May 29, 2014	-26.44% Dec 29, 2021 - Dec 26, 2023
#2	-46.80% Feb 20, 2020 - Feb 9, 2021	-20.49% Jan 23, 2025 - Jul 3, 2025
#3	-29.81% Jul 24, 2014 - Aug 7, 2017	-10.28% Jan 9, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#4	-25.53% Dec 29, 2021 - Mar 28, 2024	-9.67% Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 16, 2020
#5	-17.31% Sep 12, 2017 - May 15, 2019	-9.17% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024
#6	-13.46% Feb 18, 2025 - May 12, 2025	-5.84% Mar 28, 2024 - May 15, 2024
#7	-10.12% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024	-5.35% Oct 28, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025
#8	-9.61% Feb 27, 2026 - Apr 8, 2026	-5.35% Sep 3, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021
#9	-7.92% Mar 28, 2024 - May 15, 2024	-5.02% Feb 12, 2021 - Mar 15, 2021
#10	-7.04% Sep 3, 2021 - Nov 8, 2021	-4.71% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#11	-5.65% May 21, 2019 - Jul 3, 2019	-4.55% Dec 4, 2024 - Jan 23, 2025
#12	-5.00% May 7, 2021 - May 25, 2021	-4.46% Nov 16, 2021 - Dec 27, 2021
#13	-4.56% Oct 11, 2024 - Dec 4, 2024	-4.39% May 7, 2021 - Jun 10, 2021
#14	-4.20% Dec 9, 2024 - Dec 26, 2024	-3.70% Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021
#15	-4.12% Nov 11, 2025 - Nov 26, 2025	-3.61% Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024

Correlation

Correlation between EOD and ACLC is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.95

-101

Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)

EOD vs ACLC dividend yield comparison.

Year	EOD	ACLC
2026	4.31%	0.29%
2025	8.73%	0.64%
2024	9.16%	0.89%
2023	9.98%	1.09%
2022	11.80%	1.10%
2021	8.76%	0.72%
2020	11.41%	0.43%
2019	10.36%	0.00%
2018	13.84%	0.00%
2017	10.56%	0.00%
2016	9.91%	0.00%
2015	12.16%	0.00%
2014	9.61%	0.00%
2013	11.17%	0.00%
2012	13.87%	0.00%
2011	14.76%	0.00%
2010	11.73%	0.00%
2009	15.23%	0.00%
2008	20.96%	0.00%
2007	8.59%	0.00%