EMR vs CTAS
Comparison between Emerson Electric Company (EMR, Company) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS, Company).
Both EMR and CTAS are from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCTAS has outperformed EMR, delivering a return of +16.4% compared to +9.4%
EMR vs CTAS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
EMR vs CTAS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
EMR vs CTAS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | EMR | CTAS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.32% | +8.94% |
| 2025 | +10.49% | +4.13% |
| 2024 | +31.71% | +24.46% |
| 2023 | +3.71% | +35.60% |
| 2022 | +7.14% | +7.60% |
| 2021 | +21.75% | +30.13% |
| 2020 | +6.89% | +31.88% |
| 2019 | +31.56% | +62.22% |
| 2018 | -13.21% | +8.31% |
| 2017 | +26.32% | +35.46% |
| 2016 | +22.36% | +32.58% |
| 2015 | -19.81% | +17.39% |
| 2014 | -8.48% | +36.02% |
| 2013 | +32.05% | +43.96% |
| 2012 | +14.62% | +17.86% |
| 2011 | -16.31% | +26.66% |
| 2010 | +35.49% | +9.94% |
| 2009 | +16.48% | +11.53% |
| 2008 | -31.79% | -27.16% |
| 2007 | +32.11% | -16.06% |
| 2006 | +19.98% | -3.44% |
| 2005 | +11.45% | -4.02% |
| 2004 | +10.97% | -11.61% |
| 2003 | +27.23% | +7.44% |
| 2002 | -8.07% | -5.38% |
| 2001 | -23.25% | -4.28% |
| 2000 | +40.28% | +53.86% |
| 1999 | -2.04% | -12.73% |
EMR vs CTAS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for EMR was -56.11%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 600 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CTAS was -65.30%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2829 trading sessions.
The current EMR drawdown is -13.21%. The current CTAS drawdown is -11.13%.
| Rank | EMR | CTAS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -56.11% Jun 5, 2008 - Oct 21, 2010 | -65.30% May 14, 2002 - Aug 8, 2013 |
| #2 | -50.76% Jan 16, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020 | -48.38% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020 |
| #3 | -43.61% Dec 8, 2000 - Sep 23, 2005 | -39.89% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 4, 2000 |
| #4 | -35.94% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 13, 2017 | -36.22% Dec 26, 2000 - May 7, 2002 |
| #5 | -33.44% Jan 7, 2000 - Jun 2, 2000 | -27.67% Jun 6, 2025 - May 13, 2026 |
| #6 | -33.25% Feb 14, 2011 - Feb 14, 2013 | -27.09% Sep 6, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019 |
| #7 | -29.61% Dec 4, 2024 - Jun 30, 2025 | -23.85% Dec 10, 2021 - Nov 22, 2022 |
| #8 | -29.30% Sep 2, 2021 - Feb 7, 2024 | -23.77% Jun 2, 2000 - Nov 7, 2000 |
| #9 | -28.83% Oct 3, 2018 - Dec 11, 2019 | -19.60% Nov 26, 2024 - May 27, 2025 |
| #10 | -23.46% Feb 10, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 | -16.42% Apr 4, 2000 - Apr 25, 2000 |
| #11 | -17.90% Dec 7, 2007 - May 19, 2008 | -13.75% Dec 1, 2015 - May 24, 2016 |
| #12 | -16.98% Jul 16, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024 | -13.73% Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000 |
| #13 | -16.62% Jul 25, 2025 - Jan 16, 2026 | -13.71% Nov 16, 2020 - Jun 22, 2021 |
| #14 | -16.53% Aug 14, 2000 - Oct 31, 2000 | -12.80% Sep 6, 2016 - Dec 5, 2016 |
| #15 | -12.49% May 5, 2006 - Nov 7, 2006 | -12.41% May 16, 2000 - May 30, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between EMR and CTAS is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
EMR vs CTAS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | EMR | CTAS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.80% | 0.45% |
| 2025 | 1.61% | 0.89% |
| 2024 | 1.70% | 0.80% |
| 2023 | 2.14% | 0.83% |
| 2022 | 2.15% | 0.93% |
| 2021 | 2.18% | 0.77% |
| 2020 | 2.49% | 0.99% |
| 2019 | 2.58% | 0.95% |
| 2018 | 3.26% | 1.22% |
| 2017 | 2.76% | 1.04% |
| 2016 | 3.42% | 1.15% |
| 2015 | 3.94% | 1.15% |
| 2014 | 2.85% | 2.17% |
| 2013 | 2.37% | 1.29% |
| 2012 | 3.04% | 1.56% |
| 2011 | 3.08% | 1.55% |
| 2010 | 2.36% | 3.47% |
| 2009 | 3.11% | 1.80% |
| 2008 | 3.36% | 1.98% |
| 2007 | 1.92% | 1.16% |
| 2006 | 2.11% | 0.88% |
| 2005 | 2.26% | 0.78% |
| 2004 | 2.30% | 0.66% |
| 2003 | 2.44% | 0.54% |
| 2002 | 3.06% | 0.55% |
| 2001 | 2.69% | 0.46% |
| 2000 | 1.85% | 0.35% |
| 1999 | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks