EMN vs ZG
Comparison between Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company) and Zillow Group Inc - Class A (ZG, Company).
EMN is from the Basic Materials sector, while ZG is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceEMN has outperformed ZG, delivering a return of -6.6% compared to -22.3%
EMN vs ZG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
EMN vs ZG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
EMN vs ZG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | EMN | ZG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +9.60% | -49.06% |
| 2025 | -24.53% | -2.64% |
| 2024 | +5.62% | +26.02% |
| 2023 | +13.61% | +72.82% |
| 2022 | -29.62% | -49.60% |
| 2021 | +25.71% | -54.42% |
| 2020 | +32.48% | +202.09% |
| 2019 | +12.06% | +50.71% |
| 2018 | -20.50% | -25.70% |
| 2017 | +25.08% | +8.99% |
| 2016 | +15.91% | +48.71% |
| 2015 | -9.67% | -17.58% |
| 2014 | -3.84% | +29.06% |
| 2013 | +17.63% | +188.80% |
| 2012 | +72.68% | +20.29% |
| 2011 | -6.26% | -37.15% |
| 2010 | +39.87% | N/A |
| 2009 | +90.79% | N/A |
| 2008 | -45.80% | N/A |
| 2007 | +4.61% | N/A |
| 2006 | +17.28% | N/A |
| 2005 | -6.99% | N/A |
| 2004 | +51.49% | N/A |
| 2003 | +10.46% | N/A |
| 2002 | -1.78% | N/A |
| 2001 | -14.35% | N/A |
| 2000 | +9.36% | N/A |
| 1999 | +27.57% | N/A |
EMN vs ZG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ZG was -86.74%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current EMN drawdown is -35.83%. The current ZG drawdown is -83.60%.
| Rank | EMN | ZG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.10% May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010 | -86.74% Feb 16, 2021 - Oct 14, 2022 |
| #2 | -62.79% Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 | -65.08% Jul 28, 2014 - Jun 22, 2017 |
| #3 | -49.36% Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025 | -64.16% Feb 21, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020 |
| #4 | -44.78% May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004 | -58.60% Jun 15, 2018 - Feb 21, 2020 |
| #5 | -37.68% May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 | -49.40% Sep 20, 2012 - Mar 4, 2013 |
| #6 | -32.81% Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017 | -42.29% Sep 13, 2011 - Apr 3, 2012 |
| #7 | -32.78% May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001 | -34.23% Jul 26, 2011 - Aug 31, 2011 |
| #8 | -32.38% Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000 | -29.08% Sep 4, 2013 - Apr 21, 2014 |
| #9 | -25.48% Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006 | -28.58% May 9, 2012 - Sep 6, 2012 |
| #10 | -22.79% Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022 | -24.76% Jun 23, 2017 - Mar 5, 2018 |
| #11 | -20.90% Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 | -20.67% May 7, 2013 - Jul 12, 2013 |
| #12 | -17.42% Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 | -20.53% Mar 14, 2018 - Jun 1, 2018 |
| #13 | -13.98% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013 | -18.98% Oct 5, 2020 - Nov 6, 2020 |
| #14 | -11.60% Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 | -15.38% Nov 6, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020 |
| #15 | -11.57% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 | -15.07% Apr 9, 2012 - May 3, 2012 |
Correlation
Correlation between EMN and ZG is 0.68 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
EMN vs ZG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | EMN | ZG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.44% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 5.22% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 3.57% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 3.54% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 3.77% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 2.34% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 2.66% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 3.18% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 3.15% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 2.26% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 2.51% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.46% | 223.86% |
| 2014 | 1.91% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.55% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.59% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 2.53% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 2.13% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 2.92% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 5.55% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 2.88% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.98% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.41% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 3.05% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 4.45% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 4.79% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 4.51% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 3.61% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.92% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks