EMN vs GGB
Comparison between Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company) and Gerdau S.A. (GGB, Company).
Both EMN and GGB are from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceGGB has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +6.1% compared to -5.2%
EMN vs GGB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
EMN vs GGB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
EMN vs GGB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | EMN | GGB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +15.31% | +11.82% |
| 2025 | -24.53% | +32.73% |
| 2024 | +5.62% | -25.00% |
| 2023 | +13.61% | +0.11% |
| 2022 | -29.62% | +30.84% |
| 2021 | +25.71% | +11.60% |
| 2020 | +32.48% | -6.93% |
| 2019 | +12.06% | +25.39% |
| 2018 | -20.50% | -3.15% |
| 2017 | +25.08% | +10.80% |
| 2016 | +15.91% | +174.03% |
| 2015 | -9.67% | -64.12% |
| 2014 | -3.84% | -52.40% |
| 2013 | +17.63% | -15.68% |
| 2012 | +72.68% | +10.33% |
| 2011 | -6.26% | -43.82% |
| 2010 | +39.87% | -18.86% |
| 2009 | +90.79% | +144.27% |
| 2008 | -45.80% | -51.44% |
| 2007 | +4.61% | +84.62% |
| 2006 | +17.28% | +42.74% |
| 2005 | -6.99% | +54.17% |
| 2004 | +51.49% | +77.91% |
| 2003 | +10.46% | +195.29% |
| 2002 | -1.78% | -1.21% |
| 2001 | -14.35% | +21.40% |
| 2000 | +9.36% | -32.67% |
| 1999 | +27.57% | +50.87% |
EMN vs GGB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GGB was -96.38%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current EMN drawdown is -32.48%. The current GGB drawdown is -62.44%.
| Rank | EMN | GGB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.10% May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010 | -96.38% Jun 19, 2008 - Jan 21, 2016 |
| #2 | -62.79% Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 | -67.27% Jan 19, 2000 - Apr 17, 2002 |
| #3 | -49.36% Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025 | -49.73% Apr 17, 2002 - May 2, 2003 |
| #4 | -44.78% May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004 | -35.02% Apr 6, 2004 - Jul 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -37.68% May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 | -33.36% Mar 7, 2005 - Sep 6, 2005 |
| #6 | -32.81% Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017 | -31.97% May 2, 2006 - Feb 6, 2007 |
| #7 | -32.78% May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001 | -30.92% Jul 23, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
| #8 | -32.38% Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000 | -21.90% Nov 6, 2007 - Feb 25, 2008 |
| #9 | -25.48% Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006 | -20.12% Jan 5, 2004 - Apr 1, 2004 |
| #10 | -22.79% Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022 | -19.03% Oct 4, 2004 - Nov 29, 2004 |
| #11 | -20.90% Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 | -17.10% Feb 22, 2007 - Apr 4, 2007 |
| #12 | -17.42% Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 | -16.48% Nov 30, 2004 - Feb 18, 2005 |
| #13 | -13.98% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013 | -16.33% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 1, 2005 |
| #14 | -11.60% Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 | -14.38% Sep 12, 2003 - Oct 14, 2003 |
| #15 | -11.57% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 | -12.32% Feb 27, 2008 - Apr 3, 2008 |
Correlation
Correlation between EMN and GGB is 0.09 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
EMN vs GGB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | EMN | GGB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.32% | 1.33% |
| 2025 | 5.22% | 3.05% |
| 2024 | 3.57% | 5.06% |
| 2023 | 3.54% | 6.63% |
| 2022 | 3.77% | 12.79% |
| 2021 | 2.34% | 11.48% |
| 2020 | 2.66% | 1.34% |
| 2019 | 3.18% | 1.48% |
| 2018 | 3.15% | 1.60% |
| 2017 | 2.26% | 0.34% |
| 2016 | 2.51% | 0.38% |
| 2015 | 2.46% | 4.16% |
| 2014 | 1.91% | 2.56% |
| 2013 | 1.55% | 1.03% |
| 2012 | 1.59% | 1.54% |
| 2011 | 2.53% | 2.38% |
| 2010 | 2.13% | 2.00% |
| 2009 | 2.92% | 0.57% |
| 2008 | 5.55% | 12.10% |
| 2007 | 2.88% | 3.18% |
| 2006 | 2.98% | 3.35% |
| 2005 | 3.41% | 4.94% |
| 2004 | 3.05% | 3.41% |
| 2003 | 4.45% | 3.35% |
| 2002 | 4.79% | 6.38% |
| 2001 | 4.51% | 5.30% |
| 2000 | 3.61% | 6.43% |
| 1999 | 0.92% | 1.52% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks