EMLC vs ILF

Comparison between VANECK J.P. MORGAN EM LOCAL CURRENCY BOND ETF (EMLC, ETF) and ISHARES LATIN AMERICA 40 ETF (ILF, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceILF has outperformed EMLC, delivering a return of +12.0% compared to +1.7%

EMLC vs ILF - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EMLC(ETF)	ILF(ETF)
Net Assets	$4.90B	$5B
Expense Ratio	0.30%	0.47%
Max Drawdown	59.84%	74.37%
Sharpe Ratio	1.05	1.79
5Y Beta	0.17	0.74
P/E Ratio	N/A	8.75
Forward P/E	N/A	8.20
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.07
5Y Dividends CAGR	1.67%	19.36%
P/S Ratio	N/A	0.42
P/B Ratio	N/A	1.91

Net Assets

EMLC

$4.90B

Winner

ILF

$5B

Expense Ratio

Winner

EMLC

0.30%

ILF

0.47%

Max Drawdown

Winner

EMLC

59.84%

ILF

74.37%

Sharpe Ratio

EMLC

1.05

Winner

ILF

1.79

5Y Beta

Winner

EMLC

0.17

ILF

0.74

P/E Ratio

EMLC

N/A

ILF

8.75

Forward P/E

EMLC

N/A

ILF

8.20

PEG Ratio

EMLC

N/A

ILF

0.07

5Y Dividends CAGR

EMLC

1.67%

Winner

ILF

19.36%

P/S Ratio

EMLC

N/A

ILF

0.42

P/B Ratio

EMLC

N/A

ILF

1.91

EMLC vs ILF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EMLC	ILF
1 month	-0.97%	-5.51%
3 months	-2.19%	-1.32%
6 months	+2.78%	+19.84%
1 year	+12.00%	+48.20%
5 years(CAGR)	+1.73%	+11.98%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.09%	+8.40%
Max(CAGR)	+1.10%	+9.66%

Winner

EMLC

-0.97%

ILF

-5.51%

EMLC

-2.19%

Winner

ILF

-1.32%

EMLC

+2.78%

Winner

ILF

+19.84%

EMLC

+12.00%

Winner

ILF

+48.20%

5Y(CAGR)

EMLC

+1.73%

Winner

ILF

+11.98%

10Y(CAGR)

EMLC

+2.09%

Winner

ILF

+8.40%

Max(CAGR)

EMLC

+1.10%

Winner

ILF

+9.66%

EMLC vs ILF - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EMLC	ILF
2026	+0.62%	+16.70%
2025	+18.60%	+51.14%
2024	-2.19%	-22.04%
2023	+11.57%	+39.42%
2022	-10.37%	+10.78%
2021	-9.72%	-13.42%
2020	+2.89%	-13.86%
2019	+9.62%	+8.55%
2018	-8.53%	-9.62%
2017	+14.68%	+22.96%
2016	+9.97%	+35.67%
2015	-14.46%	-29.60%
2014	-4.52%	-9.26%
2013	-9.87%	-14.14%
2012	+15.63%	+2.87%
2011	-2.73%	-19.20%
2010	+6.68%	+11.86%
2009	N/A	+81.68%
2008	N/A	-46.65%
2007	N/A	+48.27%
2006	N/A	+35.75%
2005	N/A	+57.21%
2004	N/A	+36.32%
2003	N/A	+59.61%
2002	N/A	-22.32%
2001	N/A	+15.28%

EMLC vs ILF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EMLC was -32.43%, occurring on Oct 24, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for ILF was -67.48%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 4399 trading sessions.

The current EMLC drawdown is -4.37%. The current ILF drawdown is -5.56%.

Rank	EMLC	ILF
#1	-32.43% May 8, 2013 - Oct 24, 2022	-67.48% May 19, 2008 - Nov 11, 2025
#2	-13.74% Aug 31, 2011 - Sep 11, 2012	-41.99% Apr 17, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003
#3	-6.74% Nov 4, 2010 - Apr 20, 2011	-29.84% May 9, 2006 - Nov 29, 2006
#4	-3.86% Aug 3, 2011 - Aug 31, 2011	-22.76% Apr 5, 2004 - Sep 16, 2004
#5	-3.06% May 2, 2011 - Jul 1, 2011	-22.25% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007
#6	-2.35% Feb 1, 2013 - Apr 11, 2013	-17.62% Oct 31, 2007 - Feb 25, 2008
#7	-2.23% Oct 14, 2010 - Nov 4, 2010	-13.37% Mar 7, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005
#8	-2.13% Jul 1, 2011 - Jul 22, 2011	-12.76% Feb 14, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007
#9	-2.03% Aug 9, 2010 - Sep 3, 2010	-12.67% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 10, 2026
#10	-1.41% Oct 17, 2012 - Nov 28, 2012	-12.59% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 17, 2005
#11	-0.98% Oct 4, 2012 - Oct 16, 2012	-12.23% Feb 27, 2008 - Apr 16, 2008
#12	-0.92% Sep 3, 2010 - Sep 10, 2010	-8.83% Mar 1, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004
#13	-0.82% Sep 14, 2012 - Oct 4, 2012	-8.33% Jan 26, 2004 - Mar 1, 2004
#14	-0.65% Apr 11, 2013 - Apr 29, 2013	-8.19% Mar 3, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006
#15	-0.65% Jan 17, 2013 - Feb 1, 2013	-7.04% Apr 21, 2008 - May 5, 2008

Correlation

Correlation between EMLC and ILF is 0.65 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.65

-101

Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)

EMLC vs ILF dividend yield comparison.

Year	EMLC	ILF
2026	2.04%	0.00%
2025	5.91%	4.39%
2024	6.55%	7.44%
2023	5.97%	4.61%
2022	5.54%	12.72%
2021	5.25%	8.47%
2020	4.90%	1.88%
2019	6.25%	3.09%
2018	6.50%	3.12%
2017	5.34%	1.80%
2016	5.32%	1.59%
2015	6.25%	3.25%
2014	5.98%	2.32%
2013	5.18%	3.32%
2012	4.07%	2.59%
2011	5.71%	3.30%
2010	1.83%	2.18%
2009	0.00%	1.57%
2008	0.00%	4.23%
2007	0.00%	1.39%
2006	0.00%	1.92%
2005	0.00%	1.38%
2004	0.00%	1.17%
2003	0.00%	1.26%
2002	0.00%	2.52%
2001	0.00%	0.56%