StockComparison Logo
vs

EML vs HOFT

Comparison between Eastern Company (EML, Company) and Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT, Company).

EML is from the Industrials sector, while HOFT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceEML has outperformed HOFT, delivering a return of -1.9% compared to -12.1%

EML vs HOFT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
EML
$146M
Winner
HOFT
$146M
Max Drawdown
Winner
EML
75.58%
HOFT
85.39%
Sharpe Ratio
EML
0.22
Winner
HOFT
0.65
5Y Beta
Winner
EML
0.68
HOFT
0.85
Industry
EML
Tools & Accessories
HOFT
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
P/E Ratio
EML
25.16
Winner
HOFT
-6.41
Forward P/E
Winner
EML
9.61
HOFT
17.27
PEG Ratio
EML
1.15
Winner
HOFT
-0.07
Dividend Yield
EML
1.80%
Winner
HOFT
5.18%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
EML
4.56%
HOFT
-3.86%
5Y EPS CAGR
EML
-6.41%
HOFT
N/A
Debt to Equity
EML
26.41%
Winner
HOFT
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
EML
7.00%
HOFT
-13.30%
P/S Ratio
EML
0.64
Winner
HOFT
0.52
P/B Ratio
EML
1.25
Winner
HOFT
0.86

EML vs HOFT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
EML
+2.06%
HOFT
-19.35%
3M
Winner
EML
+10.57%
HOFT
+9.23%
6M
Winner
EML
+35.72%
HOFT
+6.19%
1Y
EML
+6.69%
Winner
HOFT
+28.57%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
EML
-1.92%
HOFT
-12.08%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
EML
+5.46%
HOFT
-1.82%
Max(CAGR)
EML
+5.71%
Winner
HOFT
+7.97%

EML vs HOFT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearEMLHOFT
2026+24.80%+25.33%
2025-24.60%-9.98%
2024+23.96%-43.50%
2023+13.68%+46.46%
2022-23.08%-16.36%
2021+11.14%-23.14%
2020-17.61%+29.30%
2019+21.13%-4.07%
2018-6.94%-36.69%
2017+32.09%+16.83%
2016+12.90%+58.11%
2015+4.20%+50.76%
2014+8.47%+7.78%
2013-0.24%+14.58%
2012-16.95%+27.65%
2011+14.23%-17.18%
2010+36.69%+14.43%
2009+54.80%+67.08%
2008-50.78%-59.92%
2007-4.95%+32.53%
2006+53.51%-3.92%
2005-0.52%-22.90%
2004+32.17%+14.04%
2003+46.15%+127.72%
2002-3.38%+106.99%
2001-6.55%+17.58%
2000-13.40%N/A
1999+2.34%N/A

EML vs HOFT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EML was -74.76%, occurring on Dec 29, 2008. Recovery took 2488 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HOFT was -80.92%, occurring on Apr 16, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current EML drawdown is -27.03%. The current HOFT drawdown is -62.83%.

RankEMLHOFT
#1-74.76%
Jun 5, 2007 - Apr 21, 2017
-80.92%
Dec 6, 2017 - Apr 16, 2025
#2-51.23%
Jun 3, 2021 - Mar 25, 2024
-78.71%
Oct 6, 2004 - Apr 10, 2015
#3-48.80%
Jan 16, 2020 - May 10, 2021
-39.72%
Mar 21, 2016 - Dec 12, 2016
#4-47.01%
Oct 17, 2024 - Jan 28, 2026
-23.15%
Dec 10, 2003 - Jul 28, 2004
#5-30.64%
Mar 27, 2024 - Oct 17, 2024
-22.49%
May 17, 2002 - Dec 13, 2002
#6-30.18%
Feb 7, 2001 - Jul 16, 2003
-21.94%
Jan 4, 2017 - Apr 6, 2017
#7-29.44%
May 21, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019
-20.48%
May 14, 2003 - Sep 12, 2003
#8-28.14%
Jan 20, 2000 - Jan 22, 2001
-20.22%
Jan 19, 2001 - May 9, 2001
#9-25.58%
Aug 17, 2005 - Sep 29, 2006
-16.74%
May 9, 2017 - Sep 22, 2017
#10-21.53%
Jun 5, 2017 - May 21, 2018
-14.04%
May 18, 2015 - Nov 25, 2015
#11-17.95%
Apr 24, 2007 - May 29, 2007
-13.42%
Jul 5, 2001 - Dec 20, 2001
#12-16.20%
Feb 8, 2007 - Mar 12, 2007
-12.99%
Oct 3, 2017 - Nov 30, 2017
#13-15.03%
Mar 1, 2005 - Jul 1, 2005
-12.62%
Dec 1, 2015 - Jan 6, 2016
#14-12.82%
Oct 2, 2006 - Dec 26, 2006
-10.14%
Jan 7, 2016 - Feb 22, 2016
#15-12.13%
Mar 12, 2007 - Apr 16, 2007
-10.04%
May 9, 2001 - Jul 5, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between EML and HOFT is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.73
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

EML vs HOFT dividend yield comparison.

YearEMLHOFT
20260.91%1.67%
20252.23%7.13%
20241.66%6.57%
20232.00%3.41%
20222.28%4.39%
20211.76%3.18%
20201.83%2.05%
20191.44%2.37%
20181.82%2.16%
20171.68%1.18%
20162.11%1.11%
20152.39%1.58%
20142.81%2.33%
20132.64%2.40%
20122.53%3.44%
20111.80%3.49%
20102.91%2.83%
20092.68%3.23%
20083.84%5.22%
20071.74%1.99%
20061.62%1.98%
20052.25%1.63%
20042.20%1.06%
20032.81%1.05%
20023.99%2.04%
20013.66%2.92%
20003.35%0.00%
19990.70%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare